Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We read with interest the article “Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the bortezomib and lenalidomide era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis” (Ann Hematol 100, 725–734 [2021]). Such an article is important for decision-making to inform clinicians of the most effective and safe treatments in a complex setting such as relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, all such studies should be conducted in line with recognized guidance [1, 2], and caution is warranted in the interpretation of this study as there are a number of serious methodological and data concerns that limit the validity of the conclusions.
The systematic literature review that was conducted to identify phase III studies was originally restricted to include only lenalidomide or bortezomib in the control arm. Fifteen such studies were identified. However, this protocol was violated when “two studies with pomalidomide and one with carfilzomib in the control arm were also included.”
Furthermore, the principles which underpin the network meta-analysis (NMA) methodology are violated on multiple levels:
-
Trials evaluating different populations without any adjustment for treatment effect modifiers are compared.
-
Studies were conducted over at least a 15-year period, during which drug availability and standard of care treatment regimens varied considerably.
-
Different backbone therapies are “considered equivalent therapies” and combined as a single “control” group.
-
Severe adverse events (SAE) are assumed to be comparable with grade III/IV events.
It is well documented that patient characteristics (i.e., age, performance status, cytogenetic risk), number of prior treatment lines, type of therapies received, and refractoriness to treatment options may act as prognostic factors and treatment effect modifiers. However, study inclusion criteria vary from no refractory patients (DOXIL-MMY-3001) to all patients were refractory (ICARIA), and the median number of prior lines of therapy ranged from 1 to 3 (see Table 1).
Lenalidomide and bortezomib are routinely used in clinical practice for MM treatment, including in combination. Assuming all control backbone therapies are “equivalent” when the efficacy differs substantially between studies invalidates this approach, as shown for example by the PFS of CASTOR (Vd) vs POLLUX (Rd). It fails to accurately capture their respective benefit and the role they may play in the efficacy of the regimen. This is also relevant for ICARIA, CANDOR, and KEYNOTE-183, which included neither lenalidomide nor bortezomib in the treatment regimens, but still had their backbone therapies combined for inclusion in the NMA.
This equivalency assumption is likely to also skew the interventional treatment’s adverse event (AE) profile, which may be over- or underestimated based on the backbone regimen. Further, results of the toxicity comparison are rendered misleading by using grade III/IV events interchangeably with SAEs. These two terminologies have distinct definitions and capture different aspects of treatment toxicity. AEs are graded I–V, and seriousness of the event is determined independently of the grade. Generally, the occurrence of grade III/IV AEs is higher than SAEs.
In conclusion, we commend the authors in attempting to address an important open question in the treatment of relapsed myeloma patients; however, we recommend an updated analysis be conducted taking into account the points mentioned above, and validated with clinical experts and experts in evidence synthesis.
References
Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ, Jansen JP, Sutton AJ (2018) Network meta-analysis for decision-making. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC et al (2011) Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health 14(4):429–437
Dimopoulos M, Siegel DS, Lonial S, Qi J, Hajek R, Facon T et al (2013) Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol 14(11):1129–1140
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, San-Miguel J, Bahlis NJ, Usmani SZ et al (2016) Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 375(14):1319–1331
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Joshua D, Pour L, Hájek R et al (2016) Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 17(1):27–38
Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, Bahlis NJ, Hansson M, Pour L et al (2016) Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 374(17):1621–1634
Hou J, Jin J, Xu Y, Wu D, Ke X, Zhou D et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China continuation study. J Hematol Oncol 10(1):137
Kropff M, Vogel M, Bisping G, Schlag R, Weide R, Knauf W et al (2017) Bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone with or without continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for primary refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase III study. Ann Hematol 96(11):1857–1866
Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, White D, Grosicki S, Spicka I et al (2015) Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 373(7):621–631
Mateos MV, Blacklock H, Schjesvold F, Oriol A, Simpson D, George A et al (2019) Pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-183): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Haematology 6(9):e459–e469
Orlowski RZ, Nagler A, Sonneveld P, Bladé J, Hajek R, Spencer A et al (2016) Final overall survival results of a randomized trial comparing bortezomib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with bortezomib alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cancer 122(13):2050–2056
Palumbo A, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, Nooka AK, Masszi T, Beksac M et al (2016) Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 375(8):754–766
Richardson PG, Oriol A, Beksac M, Liberati AM, Galli M, Schjesvold F et al (2019) Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(6):781–794
San-Miguel JF, Hungria VT, Yoon S-S, Beksac M, Dimopoulos MA, Elghandour A et al (2014) Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(11):1195–1206
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Masszi T, Špička I, Oriol A et al (2014) Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 372(2):142–152
Kumar SK, Harrison SJ, Cavo M, de la Rubia J, Popat R, Gasparetto C et al (2020) Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 21(12):1630–1642
Goldschmidt H, Mai EK, Dürig J, Scheid C, Weisel KC, Kunz C et al (2020) Response-adapted lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed myeloma: results from the phase III GMMG-MM5 trial. Leukemia 34(7):1853–1865
Grosicki S, Simonova M, Spicka I, Pour L, Kriachok I, Gavriatopoulou M et al (2020) Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England) 396(10262):1563–1573
Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Siegel D et al (2020) Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London, England) 396(10245):186–197
Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, San-Miguel J, Beksac M, Spicka I et al (2019) Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London, England) 394(10214):2096–2107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
Faith E. Davies reports consultancy/advisory boards for and honoraria from Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda. Patricia Guyot, François Bourhis, and Eleanor Saunders are employees and stockholders of Sanofi.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, F.E., Saunders, E., Bourhis, F. et al. Re: Arcuri and Americo “Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the bortezomib and lenalidomide era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis”. Ann Hematol 101, 1599–1601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04792-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04792-0