Abstract
Purpose
The sphenoid bone (SB) extracranial ligaments (ECRLs) are the pterygoalar and pterygospinous ligaments (PTAL and PTSL) that are located at the SB lateral pterygoid plate, and inferior to the foramen ovale (FO). Their ossification may affect the mandibular nerve’s distribution. The intracranial ligaments’ (ICRLs) ossification (the caroticoclinoid ligament—CCLL, the anterior and posterior interclinoid ligaments—AICLL and PICLL) may impede the approaches to the sella.
This study highlights the incidence of the ossified ECRLs and ICRLs location, their type (partial, or complete), considering laterality, gender, age, and ligaments’ simultaneous presence.
Methods
The sample consisted of 156 Greek adult dried skulls of both genders and variable age.
Results
Ossified ligaments were identified in 57.05%, predominantly extracranially (42.31%, P = 0.003). ECRLs were predominantly identified unilaterally (30.13%, P < 0.001). The majority of the ossified ICRLs were predominantly identified in male skulls (31.1%, P = 0.048) and the majority of the ECRLs (52.8%, P = 0.028) were predominantly identified at the age of 60 years and above. The PTAL was the most ossified (32.69%), followed by the CCLL (24.36%), the PTSL (16.03%), the PICLL (6.41%), and the AICLL (4.49%).
Conclusions
Detailed knowledge of the SB morphology and ligaments’ ossification extent is essential to improve the technique of the FO percutaneous approach, and sellar approaches, to minimize complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ligaments are dense, fibrous connective structures, and their ossification is frequently identified in various parts of the human body, as an age-dependent process [35]. In the sphenoid bone (SB) of the skull, both extracranial and intracranial ligaments (ECRLs and ICRLs) may be partially or completely ossified, unilaterally or bilaterally resulting in extracranial and intracranial bars (ECRBs and ICRBs). In the infratemporal fossa, two ECRLs (the pterygoalar and pterygospinous ligament, PTAL and PTSL) are identified around the SB lateral pterygoid plate (LPP), and inferior to the foramen ovale (FO). The PTAL, a thin and dense-fibrous bundle, extends from the root of the LPP to the inferior surface of the greater sphenoidal wing [10]. It lies laterally or beneath the FO, dividing it into two parts, in a horizontal axis [8, 9]. The PTSL extends from the pterygospinous process of the LPP to the SB angular spine and lies either below or medial to the FO in a vertical axis [8, 9]. PTSL ossification in a pterygospinous bar (PTSB) affects the mandibular nerve’s distribution pattern, passing through the FO (Fig. 1). In the middle cranial fossa, three ICRLs are identified around the sella, area of the clinoid processes (CPs): 1) the caroticoclinoid ligament (CCLL) located between the anterior and middle clinoid process (ACP and MCP), 2) the anterior interclinoid ligament (AICLL) located between the ACP and posterior clinoid process (PCP), and 3) the posterior interclinoid ligament (PICLL) located between the MCP and PCP (Fig. 2). The CCLL complete ossification results in the caroticoclinoid bar (CCLB) and the homonymous foramen that is penetrated by the internal carotid artery (ICA). The PICLL complete ossification results in the posterior interclinoid bar (PICLB) and foramen that gives passage to the lateral part of the circular sinus [27]. Skull base imaging by three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) [30, 61] is essential to identify the SB extracranial and intracranial ossification pattern and their extent. Focusing on the SB clinical importance, and the lack of evidence concerning the simultaneous investigation of the ECRLs and ICRLs anatomy, this study highlights the incidence of the exact location (extracranial and intracranial) of the SB ligaments’ ossification (PTALB, PTSB, CCLB, AICLB, and PICLB), their type (partial, or complete) in dried skulls, taking into consideration laterality (unilateral or bilateral side of occurrence), the gender, and the age. The simultaneous presence of the ECRBs and ICRBs was also calculated.
Materials and methods
One hundred and fifty-six (156) Greek adult dried skulls were obtained from the Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy Department of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the Anatomy Department of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. All skulls were bilaterally observed (312 sides) for the presence of the two ECRBs (PTSB and PTAB) and three ICRBs (CCLB, AICLB, and PICLB). The ossification type (partial or complete) was recorded according to the side of appearance (unilateral—right or left side or bilateral side). Partial ossification was considered the ossification extended at least 25% of the ligament’s length. Concerning the ICRLs, complete ossification was considered the ossification of the entire ligament from the tip of the one CP to the other CP tip, i.e., from the ACP to the MCP (CCLB), from the ACP to the PCP (AICLB), and from the MCP to the PCP (PICLB). As demographics were not available for all samples, among the 156 skulls, data regarding gender were known for 129 (78 male and 51 female) skulls, and age was available for 110 skulls. The sample of 110 skulls was further subclassified into three age groups: 1st group—20–39 years (33 skulls), 2nd group—40–59 years (24 skulls), and 3rd group—60 years and above (53 skulls). No skulls showed evidence of obvious trauma or pathological condition. Skulls with broken parts in the investigated area were excluded.
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0. Gender dimorphism and age distribution were investigated using the chi-square test, while side asymmetry and differences between ligaments were further examined with the McNemar test. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Ossified ligaments were identified in 57.05% of the skulls (89/156), isolated ECRBs or ICRBs in 46.15% (72 skulls), and combined ECRBs and ICRBs in 10.89% (17 skulls) (Tables 1, 2). The ossified ligaments’ distribution by (extracranial or intracranial) location and ossification pattern (isolated or mixed) is summarized in Tables 1, 2. ECRBs were predominantly identified in 42.31% (66 skulls, P = 0.003, in 47 skulls unilaterally and in 19 skulls bilaterally) (Fig. 3) compared to the ICRBs in 25.64% (40 skulls, in 25 skulls bilaterally and in 15 skulls unilaterally) (Fig. 4). The ossified ligaments’ distribution by unilateral or bilateral occurrence and by side (right or left) is summarized in Tables 3, 4. Although side symmetry was identified separately in every bar’s presence, a right-side predominance was identified in interclinoid bars’ (ICLBs) existence (11.85%, 37 sides, P = 0.035), compared to the left-side (8.97%, 28 sides) (Tables 3, 4). The most ossified ligament was the extracranial PTAL (in 32.69%, 51 skulls), followed by the intracranial CCLL (in 24.36%, 38 skulls), the extracranial PTSL (in 16.03%, 25 skulls), and the intracranial PICLL (in 6.41%, 10 skulls) and AICLL (in 4.49%, 7 skulls). The distribution of ligaments’ ossification by extracranial or intracranial location and partial or complete ossification type is summarized in Tables 3, 4. A significant PTAB predominance (P < 0.001) was identified between the PTAB and PTSB existence, as well as a CCLB predominance between the CCLB and AICLB and between the CCLB and PICLB existence. The gender and age impact on the ECRLs and ICRLs ossification is summarized in Tables 5 and 6. ECRBs were observed in 42.3% of the male and in 41.1% of the female skulls with no gender impact (P = 0.899). The higher number of the ICRBs was predominantly identified in 31.1% of the male skulls (P = 0.048), compared to the female skulls (15.7%). Most of the ECRBs (52.8%) were identified at the age of 60 years and above, with a significant difference (P = 0.028), compared to the other two groups. No age impact was observed in the detection of the ICRBs (P = 0.713).
Discussion
Development of the sphenoid bone (SB) ossification centers
The SB constitutes the central axis of the skull base development. The SB center (the so-called embryologically basisphenoid and postnatally body and lesser wing) is constituted by the presphenoid and post-sphenoid, that fuse at about 8 months. The “alisphenoid” postnatally refers to the greater wing and pterygoid plate. At 8 weeks, the ossification center for the greater wing appears in cartilage, and around the 8–9 gestational week develops the pterygoid plate’s ossification, and at 9 weeks begins the ossification in the lesser sphenoidal wing. By 16 weeks, an ossification center develops in the post-sphenoid [6]. The SB major part is formed by cartilage, except for the pterygoid process that is developed by intramembranous and endochondral ossification [17]. Vinkka [57] described in rats, the formation of the posterior and inferior parts of the pterygoid process by endochondral ossification and this is the location where the PTSB and PTAB arise.
Development of the ossified sphenoid bone (SB) ligaments: etiological factors
Ligaments are dense-fibrous structures, attached to skeletal elements and transmitting mechanical forces [4, 35]. Various ligaments in the human body are ossified to a variable degree (partially or completely) [35]. Deposits of calcium and heterotopic bone formation were also described within the dura matter folds and spanned between the PCP, dorsum sella, clivus, and petrous bone [54]. The pathogenesis of bone formation in entheses is a multifactorial process [36], including the cytokines and several systemic factors, like adipokines and gut hormones, as well as local factors, such as BMP and Wnt signaling; while angiogenesis, mechanical stress, dietary habits, metabolic abnormalities (obesity) [16], and increased age [16] may also play a role [26]. The etiology of heterotopic ligament ossification is a dynamic, and highly complex tissue repair process, that includes trauma/injury, inflammation, mesenchymal stromal cell recruitment, chondrogenic differentiation and ossification formation [63]. Ligaments’ ossification includes their fibers degenerative alterations, that are associated with a significant increase in mineral content (Ca and P) and decrease in the extracellular matrix (elastin, elastin cross-links, fibrillin, collagen, and glycoprotein) [38]. Other authors [40] reported that aging did not affect the ICRBs morphology, as this phenomenon is not age related and depends on the SB complex embryology. From the other part, Natsis et al. [33] reported a higher and significant prevalence of the CCLB and ICLB occurrence in older age groups, only in cases of complete ossification. Aging was more strongly correlated with the AICLL complete ossification than the CCLL. Natsis et al. [35] explained the phenomenon of enthesopathy with the chondrocytes’ occurrence around the ossified area, justifying the high incidence of osseous bridging with aging. Chewing on one side has been considered as a factor responsible for the PTSL and the PTAL ossification in between the pterygoid muscles’ fibers [9].
Prevalence of the ossified extracranial and intracranial ligaments (ECRLs and ICRLs)
In the current study, the SB ossified ligaments were identified in 57.05%, isolated ECRBs or ICRBs in 46.15%, and combined in 10.89%. This study identified the ECRBs in a significantly higher percentage (43.3%) compared to the ICRBs (25.64%). A significantly higher incidence of unilateral than bilateral occurrence in the ECRBs’ presence was identified. The most ossified ligament in the order of decreased frequency was the extracranial PTAL (32.69%), followed by the intracranial CCLL (24.36%), the extracranial PTSL (16.03%), and the intracranial PICLL (6.41%) and AICLL (4.49%). A significant difference was identified between the PTAB and PTSB existence, as well as between CCLB and AICLB and between CCLB and PICLB, by the present study. Nikolova et al. [37] in a Bulgarian population identified the CCLB as the most common type of the sphenoid bridging (32.6%), followed by the PTSB (12.4%) and the PTAB (2.4%). Other authors investigated exclusively the ECRBs or ICRBs; thus, no further comparison can be made.
Prevalence of the extracranial ligaments’ (ECRLs) ossification
In this study, the most ossified ECRL was the PTAL (32.7%) followed by the PTSL (16.03%). Nikolova et al. [37] found among the ECRBs, the PTSB the most occurred. Natsis et al. [34] identified a PTAB in 31.7% in a Greek population, results close to the findings of the current study (32.7%). Lower prevalence was reported in a Brazilian (2.73%) [47] and a Kenyan (8.4%) population [48]. In the current study, the PTSB presence was recorded in 16.03%, a finding similar to Goyal and Jain [21] results who identified the PTSB presence in 17.33% in an Indian population. Another study performed in a different Greek population, identified the PTSB in 38% [2]. The lowest prevalence of the PTSB existence (0.95%) was identified by Krupanidhi et al. [28] in an Indian population.
Prevalence of the intracranial ligaments’ (ICRLs) ossification
The most ossified ICRL in the order of decreased frequency was the CCLL (24.36%), followed by the PICLL (6.41%) and the AICLL (4.49%). Natsis et al. [33], investigating the ICRLs’ ossification, in another sample of Greek skulls found the CCLL the most ossified (60.15%), followed by the AICLL (19.5%) and the PICLL (2.4%), contrariwise to this study, in which the PICLL was identified most ossified than the AICLL. Özdoğmuş et al. [40] in Turks, identified a high incidence of 45% for the CCLBs, and an incidence of 6% for the ICLBs. Keyes [27] identified a higher prevalence of the CCLBs (27.46%) compared to the ICLBs (8.68%), similar to Inoue et al. [23] who found the relative prevalence in 36% and 4%, respectively. Skandalakis et al. [52] in their meta-analysis identified the CCLBs’ pooled prevalence in 32.6%.
Laterality on extracranial ligaments’ (ECRLs) ossification
In this study, a partial PTAB was predominantly identified unilaterally (21.79%) than bilaterally (5.77%). The complete PTAB was predominantly identified unilaterally (6.42%) than bilaterally (1.28%). Although the partial PTSB was predominantly identified unilaterally (11.54%) than bilaterally (0.64%), the complete PTSB presented no laterality (2.56% unilaterally and 1.92% bilaterally). Pekala et al. [42] found the pooled prevalence of the partial PTAB in 8.4% and of the complete in 4.4%. Rosa et al. [46], in a Brazilian population, identified the highest prevalence of a partial PTAB (49.4%) compared to the complete PTAB (12.9%). Henry et al. [22], identified the partial and the complete PTSB pooled prevalence in 11.6% and 4.4%, respectively. In this study, the PTAB had a significant unilateral predominance, like in Pekala et al. [42] meta-analysis, in which the commonest side of PTAB occurrence was the left side.
Laterality on intracranial ligaments’ (ICRLs) ossification
In this study, the CCLB was identified in 14.10% bilaterally and in 10.27% unilaterally. Natsis et al. [33], in another Greek sample, identified the CCLB unilateral presence in a higher prevalence (31.7%) compared to the bilateral (28.45%). The majority of the published studies pointed out a higher prevalence for the CCLB unilateral ossification compared to the bilateral, except for this study and the studies of Azeredo et al. [5], Deda et al. [12], Boyan et al. [7], and Sanobar et al. [49]. In our sample, the PICLB was identified in 5% unilaterally and bilaterally, per each and the AICLB in 3.21% unilaterally and in 1.28% bilaterally. A right-sided predominance (11.85%) was identified in ICLBs existence, compared to the left-sided (8.97%) by this study.
Gender and age impact on extracranial ligaments’ (ECRLs) ossification
In this study, ECRBs were not affected by the gender (presence in 42.3% of the male and in 41.1% of the female skulls). Contrariwise, Henry et al. [22] reported gender impact on the PTSB presence. This study also recorded a higher significant number of ECRBs (52.8%) in skulls at the age of 60 years and above, similar to Natsis et al. [34] who identified the age impact on the PTAB existence.
Gender and age impact on intracranial ligaments’ (ICRLs) ossification
In this study, the higher number of the ICRBs was identified in males (31.1%), compared to females (15.7%), contrariwise to Gibelli et al. [20] who reported no gender difference neither for sella turcica bridging nor for the ossified CCLLs. The current study agrees with that of Gibelli et al. [20] only for the lack of the gender impact on the CCLB presence, while Natsis et al. [33] supported a gender dimorphism in the occurrence of a partial CCLB. No age impact was detected by the present study in the ossified ICRLs, while Natsis et al. [33] identified age impact only in the completely ossified CCLLs and AICLLs. Gibelli et al. [20] identified a significant correlation of the sella bridging with the age (P = 0.007).
A mixed pattern of sphenoid bone (SB) ligaments’ ossification
In this study, isolated and combined ossified ligaments were identified, depending on the location of the ECRLs and ICRLs ossification. The CCLB coexisted with other ossified bars in a higher percentage (8.33%), compared to the PTAB, PTSB, and PICLB that coexisted in 5.77% and the AICLB that coexisted with other ossified bars in 3.85%. Touska et al. [55] identified the ossification of more than one ligament in 26.7% of the patients. Most of them (76.6%) had a combination of two ossified ligaments, 23.4% had a combination of more than two ligaments and 3.1% a combination of more than three ligaments. Iwanaga et al. [24] identified the coexistence of PTSB and PTAB in 10%. In this study, one skull was identified with a mixed pattern of ossification for both the AICLL and the PICLL, similar to Archana et al. [3] type II, who identified the combined ossification of the AICLL and PICLL in 5.6%. In Gibelli et al. [20] study, the two ossified variants (CCLBs and ICLBs) were often associated, as patients with no ossified sellar ligaments, usually did not present CCLBs (P < 0.001). Ossified variants among similar populations suggest that excluding racial/ethnic differences, other parameters, such as gender, age, geographical distribution, and genetic and molecular factors could play an important role in ligaments’ ossification [7].
The clinical impact of the ossified bars’ existence
SB (partial or complete) ECRLS or ICRLs ossification may entrap and compress the passing neurovascular structures causing mechanical irritation, vessels’ occlusion, and obstruction of surgical pathways [37]. The osseous bars may obstruct cranial foramina (e.g., FO) and form barriers (e.g., ICLBs or CCLBs) than hinder trans-sphenoidal surgery. In cases of combination of such accessory osseous formations with atypical adjacent foramina (of a variant morphology, i.e., of an extensive size or an atypical shape or both), the skull base imaging is essential to reveal typical or variable anatomy of the area. The gold standard imaging tool remains the 3DCT scan [30, 56, 60], offering a detailed depiction, and permitting the meticulous registration of the complicated (typical and variant) anatomy of the sella, essential for the identification of the ICA pathology [14]. Moreover, the ITF tissues’ depiction by this tool, and the use of neuro-navigation helps the FO approach, with accuracy and safety [19, 56]. Liu et al. [31] confirmed better clinical outcomes, lower recurrence rates, and shorter operation time when assisting from the guidance technique during FO radiofrequency thermocoagulation. The identification of the SB partial or complete ECRLs ossification may force radical modifications in selecting optional trajectory to access safely the FO, as their topography across the FO can significantly hinder the surgical procedure [60]. Otherwise, a wrong trajectory can lead to injury of the vital anatomical structures, like the ICA, the internal jugular vein, the eustachian tube, the ocular motor nerves (III, IV, and VI), and other neurovascular structures running to the orbit [15, 44, 60].
The extracranial complete PTAB is of greater clinical importance compared to the complete PTSB [46], due to its lateral location in relation to the FO and greater thickness (4 mm according to Chouke and Hodes [10]) comparing to the PTSB which is thinner and located medially to the FO, and thus do not create a barrier for the needle to be inserted through its lumen. The PTAB may compress on the trigeminal nerve’s mandibular division [2, 53] causing chewing disorders, pain, and numbness of the buccal area and tongue and parotid gland salivatory changes [43]. The PTAB may also hinder the transoval approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia [29]. In such difficult cases, the surgeon cannot reach FO during percutaneous procedures after repeated attempts in different angles [62]. Matys et al. [32] suggested that when the anterior access of the FO was blocked by a PTAB, the FO could be alternatively approached from an inframandibular direction. Additionally, the neurovascular structures perforating FO (the mandibular and the superficial lesser petrosal nerves, the accessory meningeal artery, and an emissary vein connecting with the pterygoid venous plexus) may be injured, resulting in neuropathy and postoperative hemorrhage, in the ITF [44].
The PTSB presence is of importance during retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal surgery and in anesthetic blockade, as may act as a barrier to the needle’s passage through FO [45]. In cases of a PTAB and a PTSB coexistence, a different treatment approach is selected, using the microvascular decompression or the stereotactic radiosurgery.
The PTAB coexistence with a FO variant in shape and size, in cases of obstruction, poses a risk of inadvertent cannulation of the foramen lacerum [15]. Coincidence of a small and narrow FO, with an ossified PTAL, a FO atypical orientation and an abnormal basicranial angulation can be troubleshooting for performing FO standard canulation, or effective percutaneous rhizotomy of the trigeminal nerve [15]. In addition, the presence of a variant pterygoid process ridge may obscure the FO, rendering the FO cannulation procedure competitive [59]. Iwanaga et al. [25] pointed out the relationship in between the base of the lateral pterygoid plate posterior border with the FO and highlighted that in cases of a distance between them (distant or removed type) the failure of percutaneous procedures for treating trigeminal neuralgia is certain.
The existence of the ICLBs and CCLBs may impede surgical approaches to the paraclinoid, sellar, and parasellar regions. Their clinical impact also depends on the size, location, and type of formation (complete or incomplete). In such cases, stepwise disconnection of the bony structures of the sella is recommended to avoid destruction of the anatomical structures involved in the lesions [18, 64]. Thus, standard endoscopic endonasal operations perform at the sella region may require modification to minimize risk of neurosurgical complications (e.g., rupture of the paraclinoid aneurysm, ICA damage, while removal of the clinoidal meningiomas). Specifically, the CCLBs existence may cause ICA compression, tightening or stretching, resulting in an insufficient blood supply to the brain [40]. The existence of a complete CCLB may complicate the anterior clinoidectomy (necessary to expose cavernous sinus and access the ICA clinoid segment for management of aneurysms, neoplasms, and traumatic parasellar lesions) [3, 55, 65], and increase the risk of carotid laceration [23, 50], especially in cases of the ICA aneurysmal branches [39]. In addition, the MCP is a reliable landmark for localization of the cavernous sinus’ anteromedial roof and the transition between the ICA intracavernous and paraclinoidal segments during endoscopic endonasal approach to the sellar, parasellar, and suprasellar region [11, 18]. Divya et al. [13] pointed out the positive correlation in between the sella bridging and the existence of impacted canines and hyperdontia, thus highlighted this ossification as a diagnostic marker of the underlying dental anomalies. In complex cases of ECRLs and ICRLs ossification with an altered FO morphology and morphometry, and coexisted variants, the preoperative 3DCT scan may reveal the possible obstruction of the needle by the PTAB, as well as the asymmetry of the FO location bilaterally [15]. In addition, skull base surgeons should also consider preoperatively possible racial, gender, and age differences, especially when applying novel techniques or modifying the surgical approach in tumor resection or aneurysm repair cases in the sella [7].
Phylogeny details on the ossified ligaments
In different species, the ossified bars present variability in their topography and morphology. Taking as example the extracranial ossification of the PTSL into a PTSB, in lemurs, it passes medial to the FO, and in pithecoids, the usually complete PTSB passes lateral to the FO. In humans and anthropoids, it is usually incomplete [51]. A wide PTSB exists in skulls of herbivores, carnivores, and mature monkeys [1], and a small one is seen in rodents. In new-world monkeys, the PTSB lacks [58] Therefore, the presence of PTSB in humans is a phylogenic remnant [1, 58]. The PTAB is normally seen in lower animals and persists in a variable percentage among different races of the human population [41].
Study strengths and limitations
The study’s strength is the simultaneous investigation of the SB ossification extent, extracranially and intracranially, giving emphasis on each ligament, laterality, gender, and age impact. The isolated and mixed pattern of these ligaments’ ossification is also highlighted. The study’s limitations are: 1) the low number of the identified ligaments (ECRLs in 66 skulls and ICRLs in 40 skulls) that did not permit us to further investigate the gender and the age impact on each ligament’s existence, 2) the high number of broken parts in the PCPs did not permit to further correlate the ossification tendency in between the three CPs, 3) the lack of morphometric measurements, as well as the unavailability to investigate the soft tissues of the extracranial area (calculation of the laterality effect), and 4) the lack of soft tissues, thus the PTAL and PTSL variant morphology in relation to the mandibular nerve distribution could not be recorded, according to the novel classification approach of Iwanaga et al. [24].
Conclusions
This study reveals the predominant presence of the ECRBs compared to the ICRBs. The most occurred ECRB was the PTAB and regarding the ICRB, the most occurred was the CCLB, followed by the PICLB. The ECRBs were predominantly identified unilaterally, while the ICRBs were found with a higher prevalence bilaterally, with no side predominance. ECRBs and ICRBs predominantly identified in male skulls. The ECRBs were predominantly found in skulls of 60 years and above. In most cases, isolated PTABs, PTSBs, and CCLBs were identified, contrariwise to the AICLBs and the PICLBs that occurred in combination with other ICLBs. Detailed knowledge of the typical anatomy and variant morphology of the SB extracranial and intracranial area and the ossification extent of the adjacent ligaments is essential to improve the techniques of approaches, in selection to the lesion, to avoid complications. The detailed imaging of the area may improve the accuracy and safety of manipulations (safe distance and angulation) to minimize complications.
Data availability
Data and material related to the report will be available with the corresponding author for further reference.
References
Al-Khatib M (2006) Die pterygospinösen strukturen beim menschen und anderen primaten. Institut für Anatomie und Zellbiologie, Universität Würzburg
Antonopoulou M, Piagou M, Anagnostopoulou S (2008) An anatomical study of the pterygospinous and pterygoalar bars and foramina – their clinical relevance. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 36:104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.05.009
Archana R, Anita R, Jyoti C, Punita M, Rakesh D (2009) Incidence of osseous interclinoid bars in Indian population. Surg Radiol Anat 32:383–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0582-z
Asahara H, Inui M, Lotz MK (2017) Tendons and ligaments: connecting developmental biology to musculoskeletal disease pathogenesis. JBMR 32:1773–1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3199
Azeredo RA, Liberti EA, Watanabe IS (1989) Anatomical variations of the clinoid process of the human sphenoid bone. Arq Cent Estud Curso Odontol 25–26:9–11
Bosma JF (1986) Anatomy of the infant head, 1st edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Boyan N, Ozsahin E, Kizilkanat E, Tekdemir I, Soames R, Oguz O (2011) Surgical importance of the morphometry of the anterior clinoid process, optic strut, caroticoclinoid foramen, and interclinoid Osseous Bridge. Neurosurg Q 21:133–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnq.0b013e31820f1929
Chakravarthi K, Babu SK (2012) An anatomical study of the pterygoalar bar and porus crotaphitico buccinatorius. Int J Health Sci 1:3–9
Chouke KS (1946) On the incidence of the foramen of civinini and the porus crotaphitico-buccinatorius in American Whites and Negroes. I. Observations on 1544 Skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 4:203–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330040215
Chouke KS, Hodes PJ (1951) The pterygoalar bar and its recognition by Roentgen methods in trigeminal neuralgia. Am J Roentgenol 65:180–182
Clarke E, Golberg M, Smędra A, Mazur M, Mazurek A, Balawender K, Barszcz K, Żytkowski A (2022) Bilateral caroticoclinoid foramen and unilateral abducens nerve canal found on the fetal skull – Case report. Transl Res Anat 29:100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2022.100224
Deda HI, Tekdemir A, Kaplan HZ, Gökalp (1992) Sinus cavernosus mikro anatomisi (bölüm 1) kemik yaplar ve varyasyonlar. J Fac Med Univ Ankara 45:477–486
Divya S, Urala A, Gl P, Pentapati K (2018) Sella turcica bridging a diagnostic marker for impacted canines and supernumerary teeth. J Int Oral Health 10:94. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_276_17
Dolenc VV (1985) A combined epi- and subdural direct approach to carotid-ophthalmic artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 62:667–672. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.62.5.0667
Elnashar A, Patel SK, Kurbanov A, Zvereva K, Keller JT, Grande AW (2020) Comprehensive anatomy of the foramen ovale critical to percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency rhizotomy: cadaveric study of dry skulls. J Neurosurg 132:1414–1422. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.jns18899
Endo T, Takahata M, Koike Y, Fujita R, Suzuki R, Hisada Y, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki H, Yamada K, Iwata A, Sudo H, Yoneoka D, Iwasaki N (2022) Association between obesity and ossification of spinal ligaments in 622 asymptomatic subjects: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Metab 40:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-021-01292-5
Fawcett E (1910) Notes on the development of the human sphenoid. J Anat Physiol 44:207–222
Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tormenti M, Latorre F, Gardner P, Snyderman C (2012) Endoscopic endonasal middle clinoidectomy. Oper Neurosurg 71:ons233–ons239. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e3182690b6b
Furtado SV, Thakar S, Hegde AS (2012) The use of image guidance in avoiding vascular injury during trans-sphenoidal access and decompression of recurrent pituitary adenomas. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:680–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.12.002
Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, Panzeri M, Oliva AG, Termine G, Sforza C (2018) Sella turcica bridging and ossified carotico-clinoid ligament: correlation with sex and age. Neuroradiol J 31:299–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400917751036
Goyal N, Jain A (2016) An anatomical study of the pterygospinous bar and foramen of Civinini. Surg Radiol Anat 38:931–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1639-4
Henry BM, Pękala PA, Frączek PA, Pękala JR, Natsis K, Piagkou M, Tomaszewski KA, Tomaszewska IM (2019) Prevalence, morphology, and morphometry of the pterygospinous bar: a meta-analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 42:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02305-9
Inoue T, Rhoton AL, Theele D, Barry ME (1990) Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus. Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199006000-00001
Iwanaga J, Clifton W, Dallapiazza RF, Miyamoto Y, Komune N, Gremillion HA, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS (2020) The pterygospinous and pterygoalar ligaments and their relationship to the mandibular nerve: application to a better understanding of various forms of trigeminal neuralgia. Ann Anat 229:151466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151466
Iwanaga J, Patra A, Ravi KS, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS (2022) Anatomical relationship between the foramen ovale and the lateral plate of the pterygoid process: application to percutaneous treatments of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Rev 45:2193–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01715-x
Iwasawa T, Iwasaki K, Sawada T, Okada A, Ueyama K, Motomura S, Harata S, Inoue I, Toh S, Furukawa K-I (2006) Pathophysiological role of endothelin in ectopic ossification of human spinal ligaments induced by mechanical stress. Calcif Tissue Int 79:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-006-0147-7
Keyes JE (1935) Observations on four thousand optic foramina in human skulls of known origin. Arch Ophthalmol 13(4):538–568
Krupanidhi US, Mallikarjun M, Phaniraj S, Jayaprakash BR (2014) A study on bilateral ossified pterygospinous ligament and its clinical significance. Int J Biomed Res 5(9):563–565
Lepp FH, Sandner MO (1968) Anatomic-radiographic study of ossified pterygospinous and “innominate” ligaments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26:244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(68)90262-4
Lin MH-C, Lee M-H, Wang T-C, Cheng Y-K, Su C-H, Chang C-M, Yang J-T (2011) Foramen ovale cannulation guided by intra-operative computed tomography with integrated neuronavigation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir 153:1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1009-2
Liu H, Xu L, Zhao W (2023) Puncture approaches and guidance techniques of radiofrequency thermocoagulation through foramen Ovale for primary trigeminal neuralgia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1024619
Matys T, Ali T, Zaccagna F, Barone DG, Kirollos RW, Massoud TF (2020) Ossification of the pterygoalar and pterygospinous ligaments: a computed tomography analysis of infratemporal fossa anatomical variants relevant to percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 132:1942–1951. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.2.jns182709
Natsis K, Piagkou M, Lazaridis N, Totlis T, Anastasopoulos N, Constantinidis J (2018) Incidence and morphometry of sellar bridges and related foramina in dry skulls: their significance in middle cranial fossa surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46:635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.008
Natsis K, Piagkou M, Skotsimara G, Totlis T, Apostolidis S, Panagiotopoulos N-A, Skandalakis P (2014) The ossified pterygoalar ligament: an anatomical study with pathological and surgical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:e266–e270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.003
Natsis K, Tsikaras P, Totlis T, Gigis I, Skandalakis P, Appell HJ, Koebke J (2007) Correlation between the four types of acromion and the existence of enthesophytes: a study on 423 dried scapulas and review of the literature. Clin Anat 20:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20320
Neve A, Maruotti N, Corrado A, Cantatore FP (2016) Pathogenesis of ligaments ossification in spondyloarthritis: insights and doubts. Ann Med 49:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2016.1243802
Nikolova S, Toneva D, Zlatareva D, Fileva N (2023) Osseous bridges of the sphenoid bone: frequency, bilateral and sex. Distrib Biol 12:492. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040492
Osakabe T, Hayashi M, Hasegawa K, Okuaki T, Ritty TM, Mecham RP, Wachi H, Seyama Y (2001) Age- and gender-related changes in ligament components. Ann Clin Biochem 38:527–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456320103800510
Ota N, Tanikawa R, Miyazaki T, Miyata S, Oda J, Noda K, Tsuboi T, Takeda R, Kamiyama H, Tokuda S (2015) Surgical microanatomy of the anterior clinoid process for paraclinoid aneurysm surgery and efficient modification of extradural anterior clinoidectomy. World Neurosurg 83:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.014
Özdoğmuş Ö, Saka E, Tulay C, Gürdal E, Üzün I, Çavdar S (2003) The anatomy of the carotico-clinoid foramen and its relation with the internal carotid artery. Surg Radiol Anat 25:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0111-4
Patnaik VVK, Singla RK, Bala S (2001) Bilateral pterygoalar bar and porus crotaphiticobuccinatorius-a case report. J Anat Soc India 50(2):161–162
Pękala PA, Henry BM, Pękala JR, Frączek PA, Taterra D, Natsis K, Piagkou M, Skrzat J, Tomaszewska IM (2017) The pterygoalar bar: a meta-analysis of its prevalence, morphology and morphometry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45:1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.019
Peker T, Karakose M, Anil A, Turgut HB, Gulekon N (2002) The incidence of basal sphenoid bony bridges in dried crania and cadavers: their anthropological and clinical relevance. Eur J Morphol 40:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1076/ejom.40.3.171.16686
Peris-Celda M, Graziano F, Russo V, Mericle RA, Ulm AJ (2013) Foramen ovale puncture, lesioning accuracy, and avoiding complications: microsurgical anatomy study with clinical implications. J Neurosurg 119:1176–1193. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.jns12743
Peuker ET, Fischer G, Filler TJ (2001) Entrapment of the lingual nerve due to an ossified pterygospinous ligament. Clin Anat 14:282–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.1048
Rosa RR, Faig-Leite H, Faig-Leite FS, Moraes LC, Moraes MEL, Filho EM (2010) Radiographic study of ossification of the pterygospinous and pterygoalar ligaments by the Hirtz axial technique. Acta Odontol Latinoam 23(1):63–67
Rossi AC, Freire AR, Manoel C, Prado FB, Botacin PR, Caria PHF (2017) Incidence of the ossified pterygoalar ligament in Brazilian human skulls and its clinical implications. J Morphol Sci 28(1): 0–0.
Ryu S-J, Park M-K, Lee U-Y, Kwak H-H (2016) Incidence of pterygospinous and pterygoalar bridges in dried skulls of Koreans. Anat Cell Biol 49:143. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2016.49.2.143
Sanobar IS, Rahul KU, Deepak NK, Chhaya VD (2012) Study of carotico-clinoid foramen in dry human skulls of Aurangabad district. IJBMS 3:148–154
Sharma A, Rieth GE, Tanenbaum JE, Williams JS, Ota N, Chakravarthi S, Manjila S, Kassam A, Yapicilar B (2018) A morphometric survey of the parasellar region in more than 2700 skulls: emphasis on the middle clinoid process variants and implications in endoscopic and microsurgical approaches. J Neurosurg 129:60–70. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.jns162114
Singh AK, Niranjan R (2019) Study of pterygospinous and pterygoalar bars in relation to foramen ovale in dry human skulls. Natl J Clin Anat 08:097–100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698602
Skandalakis GP, Koutsarnakis C, Pantazis N, Kalyvas A, Komaitis S, Lani E, Drosos E, Kalamatianos T, Hadjipanayis CG, Natsis K, Stranjalis G, Piagkou M (2019) Caroticoclinoid bar: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its prevalence and potential implications in cerebrovascular and skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 124:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.017
Skrzat J, Walocha J, Środek R (2005) An anatomical study of the pterygoalar bar and the pterygoalar foramen. Folia Morphol 64(2):92–96
Skrzat J, Zamojska I, Spulber A, Zarzecki M, Walocha J (2017) Ossification of the petrosphenoid ligament: a case study. Folia Med Crac 57(2):87–94
Touska P, Hasso S, Oztek A, Chinaka F, Connor SEJ (2019) Skull base ligamentous mineralisation: evaluation using computed tomography and a review of the clinical relevance. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0740-8
Tubbs RS, May WR, Apaydin N, Shoja MM, Shokouhi G, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA (2009) Ossification of ligaments near the foramen ovale. Oper Neurosurg 65:ons60–ons64. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000345952.64041.9c
Vinkka H (1982) Secondary cartilages in the facial skeleton of the rat. Proc Finn Dent Soc 78:1
von Lüdinghausen M, Kageyama I, Miura M, AlKhatib M (2006) Morphological peculiarities of the deep infratemporal fossa in advanced age. Surg Radiol Anat 28:284–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0078-z
Wang Z, Cheng M, Su X, Li K, Wang G, Gao Y, Du C, Tian Y (2022) Identifying a novel critical access difficulty factor in percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: pterygoid process ridge. Oper Neurosurg 22:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000169
Xu Y, El Ahmadieh TY, Nunez MA, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Cohen-Gadol AA, Mao Y (2023) Refining the anatomy of percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy: a cadaveric, radiological, and surgical study. Oper Neurosurg 24:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000590
Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhang S (2013) The indication and application of computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery—Shanghai’s experience based on 104 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:770–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.016
Zdilla MJ, Hatfield SA, Mangus KR (2016) Angular relationship between the foramen ovale and the trigeminal impression. J Craniofac Surg 27:2177–2180. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003138
Zhang Q, Zhou D, Wang H, Tan J (2020) Heterotopic ossification of tendon and ligament. J Cell Mol Med 24:5428–5437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15240
Zhao X, Labib MA, Avci E, Preul MC, Baskaya MK, Little AS, Nakaji P (2020) Navigating a carotico-clinoid foramen and an interclinoidal bridge in the endonasal endoscopic approach: an anatomical and technical note. J Neurol Surg B: Skull Base 82:534–539. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715470
Żytkowski A, Skrzat J, Mazurek A, Majos A, Radek M, Gładysz T, Clarke E, Wysiadecki G (2022) Clinical relevance of the caroticoclinoid foramen – a case report and concise literature review. Transl Res Anat 27:100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2022.100186
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the body donors and their families for their greatest contribution to the Anatomy education and Research.
Funding
Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization MP; Data curation MP, AT; Formal analysis MP, GTr, MK; Investigation MP, AT; Methodology MP, CP; Project administration MP, KN; Resources GTr, GTs, CK, NZ, TT, AT; Supervision CP, KN; Roles/Writing—original draft MP, GTr, LO; Writing—review and editing JS, LO, TT, AT, KAN, VK, CT, and KN.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
All the authors gave consent for the publication of the report.
Ethical approval
As this is a case series that is completely on cadavers, no ethical clearance was required as cadavers are used for teaching and research purpose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Piagkou, M., Fiska, A., Tsakotos, G. et al. A morphological study on the sphenoid bone ligaments’ ossification pattern. Surg Radiol Anat 45, 1405–1417 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03226-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03226-4