Abstract
Purpose
The corpus callosum (CC) is the primary interhemispheric connection between the two cerebral hemispheres. Besides their similar morphological characters, there are differences in their measurements. This study aimed to divide the CC into groups using planes based on the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) and to detect differences in CC magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cadaver samples between these groups.
Methods
The study included 80 patients (40 male and 40 female patients) who underwent normal MRI in the midsagittal plane, and 38 cerebral hemispheres from 40 adult cadaver brains, with each hemisected in the midsagittal plane. The medial surface of the CC was divided vertically into three parts (the anterior, middle, and posterior zones) according to the AC and PC. Areas and parameters were measured in both the cadaveric hemispheres and patient MRI images.
Results
The total CC area and CC areas between, anterior, and posterior to the AC-PC vertical lines were the same in both the MRI and cadaver samples. In addition, morphometric measurements like the CC length, AC-PC length, and CC height at the AC and PC vertical lines, and their correlations were also found to be similar between the MRI and cadaver samples.
Conclusion
This study proposes three areas according to AC and PC classification (anterior, middle, and posterior). This new proposed classification is suitable for stereotactic interventions and is useful for obtaining data from MRI images. However, it should be kept in mind that there may be changes and variations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E (1992) Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res 598:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(92)90178-c
Guner YE, Comert A, Sayaci EY, Korkmaz AC, Gungor Y, Morali Guler T, Kahilogullari G, Savas A (2023) Microsurgical anatomy of the anterior cerebral artery and the arterial supply of the cingulate gyrus. Surg Radiol Anat 45:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03083-1
Gupta T, Singh B, Kapoor K, Gupta M, Kochar S (2008) Corpus callosum morphometry: comparison of fresh brain, preserved brain and magnetic resonance imaging values. Anat Sci Int 83:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2008.00227.x
Hasan KM, Kamali A, Kramer LA, Papnicolaou AC, Fletcher JM, Ewing-Cobbs L (2008) Diffusion tensor quantification of the human midsagittal corpus callosum subdivisions across the lifespan. Brain Res 1227:52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.030
Johnson SC, Farnworth T, Pinkston JB, Bigler ED, Blatter DD (1994) Corpus callosum surface area across the human adult life span: effect of age and gender. Brain Res Bull 35:373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(94)90116-3
Laitinen LV (1972) Stereotactic lesions in the knee of the corpus callosum in the treatment of emotional disorders. Lancet 299:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90124-9
Lee BY, Sohn JH, Choi MH, Lee SJ, Kim HS, Yang JW, Choi JS, Kim HS, Yi JH, Tack GR, Chung SC (2009) A volumetric study of the corpus callosum in 20s and 40s Korean people. Brain Struct Funct 213:463–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-009-0209-5
Neumaier F, Paterno M, Alpdogan S, Tevoufouet EE, Schneider T, Hescheler J, Albanna W (2017) Surgical approaches in psychiatry: a survey of the world literature on psychosurgery. World Neurosurg 97:603–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.008
Nowinski WL (2008) Towards construction of an ideal stereotactic brain atlas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1270-6
Okanishi T, Fujimoto A (2021) Corpus callosotomy for controlling epileptic spasms: a proposal for surgical selection. Brain Sci 11:1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121601
Ozdemir ST, Ercan I, Sevinc O, Guney I, Ocakoglu G, Aslan E, Barut C (2007) Statistical shape analysis of differences in the shape of the corpus callosum between genders. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 290:825–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20558
Park HJ, Kim JJ, Lee SK, Seok JH, Chun J, Kim DI, Lee JD (2008) Corpus callosal connection mapping using cortical gray matter parcellation and DT-MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 29:503–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20314
Patra A, Singla RK, Chaudhary P, Malhotra V (2020) Morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum using cadaveric brain: an anatomical study. Asian J Neurosurg 15:322–327. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_328_19
Puthanveetil A, Balan R (2017) Morphometric analysis of corpus callosum—a study in cadaver and MRI. J Evid Based Med Healthc 4:3219–3222. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2017/639
Shah A, Jhawar S, Goel A, Goel A (2021) Corpus callosum and its connections: a fiber dissection study. World Neurosurg 151:e1024–e1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.047
Taghipour M, Ghaffarpasand F (2018) Corpus callosotomy for drug-resistant schizophrenia; novel treatment based on pathophysiology. World Neurosurg 116:483–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.113
Talairach J, Rayport M, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Thieme, Stuttgart
Uda T, Kunihiro N, Umaba R, Koh S, Kawashima T, Ikeda S, Ishimoto K, Goto T (2021) Surgical aspects of corpus callosotomy. Brain Sci 11:1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121608
Vaddiparti A, Huang R, Blihar D, Du Plessis M, Montalbano MJ, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2021) The evolution of corpus callosotomy for epilepsy management. World Neurosurg 145:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.178
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind's overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude. The authors wish to thank the senior draftsmen Caner Ruhi CAVLAZ and Burhan AVCI for the elaborate analyses of morphometric data. The authors also wish to thank Enago for English editing and manuscript proofreading services.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by YEG, YG, and AC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YEG, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This is a cadaveric and radiological study, and all cadavers were supplied from a donated institution with subjects giving written informed consent for the use of samples in scientific studies. All the performed procedures in this study that involve cadavers followed the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Radiological data were collected after approval from the Liv Hospital ethics committee (Approval Number: 2022/004).
Consent to publication
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images as figures.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guner, Y.E., Comert, A., Aslan, A. et al. Corpus callosum area and sectioning: a radioanatomical study correlated with MRI and cadaver morphometry. Surg Radiol Anat 45, 1427–1433 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03206-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03206-8