Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

External occipital protuberance classification with special reference to spine type and its clinical implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This investigation aimed to study the types of external occipital protuberance (EOP) with special reference to Type 3 (spine type). Detailed information will be useful for clinicians to manage occipital headaches or issues related to the biomechanics of the neck and for accurate radiological interpretations.

Methods

Thirty-one dry intact cadaveric skulls were studied for EOP classification. In Type III EOP cases, the size of EOP was noticed using different modalities and compared. The superior nuchal lines and external occipital crest were observed for their prominence and any variation.

Results

42% of the skulls belong to Type 1, 51.5% to Type 2, and 6.5% to Type 3 EOP. Superior nuchal lines and external occipital crest were more prominent in Types 2 and 3 EOP. In Type 3 EOP cases, the mean length, width, and thickness of the spine as measured directly on the skull were 16.63 mm; 20.1 mm, and 7.82 mm respectively, the same as radiograph findings. CT examination revealed the average volume as 0.95 cm3. Out of two Type 3 EOP cases, the spine with larger values for its size was having a lesser volume value in CT.

Conclusions

Plain lateral radiography is a reliable method to measure the length and thickness of spinous EOP. However, more values of these parameters for morphometry of the EOP spine do not mean more volume of EOP and vice versa. Detailed information regarding the occurrence of occipital spur and its morphology will be of great importance to neurosurgeons, sports, physicians, emergency departments, and radiologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data are available on request, from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Bogduk N (1981) The anatomy of occipital neuralgia. Clin Exp Neurol 17:167–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gómez Zubiaur A, Alfageme F, López-Negrete E, Roustan G (2019) Type 3 external occipital protuberance (spine type): ultrasonographic diagnosis of an uncommon cause of subcutaneous scalp pseudotumor in adolescents. Actas Dermosifiliogr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2018.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gülekon IN, Turgut HB (2003) The external occipital protuberance: can it be used as a criterion in the determination of sex? J Forensic Sci 48:513–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwanaga J, Singh V, Ohtsuka A, Hwang Y, Kim HJ, Moryś J et al (2021) Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: recommendations from anatomical journal editors. Clin Anat 34:2–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacques T, Jaouen A, Kuchcinski G et al (2020) Enlarged external occipital protuberance in young French individuals’ head CT: stability in prevalence, size, and type between 2011 and 2019. Sci Rep 10:6518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63554-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadri PAS, Al-Mefty O (2007) Anatomy of the nuchal ligament and its surgical applications. Neurosurgery 61:301–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall RC, Abela C, Eccles S (2015) Painful exostosis of the external occipital protuberance. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(11):e174–e176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21625-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nevo O, Bronshtein M (2010) Fetal transient occipital bone protuberance during early pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 30:879–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sattur M, Korson C, Henderson F Jr, Kalhorn S (2019) Presentation and management of traumatic occipital spur fracture. Am J Emerg Med 37:1005.e1-1005.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Satyarthee GD (2019) External occipital protuberance projecting as downward curved horn presenting with intractable occipital pain: report of a first case. J Pediatr Neurosci 14:173–174. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpn.JPN_94_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shahar D, Sayers MGL (2016) A morphological adaptation? The prevalence of enlarged external occipital protuberance in young adults. J Anat 229:286–291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahar D, Sayers MGL (2018) Prominent exostosis projecting from the occipital squama more substantial and prevalent in young adults than older age groups. Sci Rep 8:3354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahar D, Evans J, Sayers MGL (2018) Large enthesophytes in teenage skulls: mechanical, inflammatory and genetic considerations. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 53:60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh R (2012) Bony tubercle at external occipital protuberance and prominent ridges. J Craniofac Surg 23:1873–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava M, Asghar A, Srivastava NN, Gupta N, Jain A, Verma J (2018) An anatomic morphological study of occipital spurs in human skulls. J Craniofac Surg 29:217–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Standring S (2007) Gray’s anatomy, 14th edn. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London, p 411

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sundar R, Yuvaraj Babu K (2020) Morphometric analysis of external occipital crest. Biosc Biotech Res Comm. https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/13.8/101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tubbs RS, Mortazavi MM, Loukas M, D’Antoni AV, Shoja MM, Chern JJ et al (2011) Anatomical study of the third occipital nerve and its potential role in occipital headache/neck pain following midline dissections of the craniocervical junction. J Neurosurg Spine 15:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Varghese E, Samson RS, Kumbargere SN, Pothen M (2017) Occipital spur: understanding a normal yet symptomatic variant from orthodontic diagnostic lateral cephalogram. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017220506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research and teaching could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase scientific knowledge and can improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest respect [4].

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS: Project development, Data collection, Data analysis and management, manuscript writing, approval of the final version. PC: Data management, Data analysis, approval of the final version. PS: Project development, Data analysis, manuscript editing, approval of the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali Singal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study is approved by Institutional Ethical Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singal, A., Chaudhary, P. & Singh, P. External occipital protuberance classification with special reference to spine type and its clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 45, 555–561 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03133-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03133-8

Keywords

Navigation