Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative comparison of anatomical microdissection, Sihler’s staining and computerized reconstruction methods for visualizing intramuscular nerve branches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stating backround

This study was designed to examine the entire intramuscular nerve distribution pattern of various human skeletal muscles in fetuses.

Methods

In the present study rhomboid major, trapezius, long head of the biceps femoris and masseter muscles were investigated in five 18 weeks old fetal cadavers. Anatomical microdissection was applied to one fetal cadaver. In two fetuses, the extramuscular (main), major and minor nerve branches, and anastomosis were examined using Sihler’s staining and labeling. In the remaining two fetuses, consecutive slices with 0.5 mm interval and 5 μm thickness were obtained from each skeletal muscle. These slices were stained with S100 for the demonstration of the nerve fibers and thereafter 3D reconstruction images were constituted using PC software.

Results

Anatomical microdissection, Sihler’s staining and computerized reconstruction methods were compared to demonstrate the intramuscular nerve distribution pattern. Demonstration of the intramuscular minor nerve branches and anastomosis showed difficulties in anatomical dissected specimens when compared with three-dimensionally reconstructed images and specimens obtained with Sihler’s staining technique. Nevertheless, anatomical dissection is a simple method whereas Sihler’s technique and computer aided 3D reconstruction are complex methods and take a long time to complete.

Conclusion

The obtained information exposed that staining technique and the 3D reconstructions appeared to provide better results than did anatomical dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boenish T, Farmilo AJ, Stead RH, Key M, Welcher R, Harvey R, Atwood KN (2001) Handbook immunochemical staining methods, 3rd edn. DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, pp 5–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. Born G (1883) Die Plattenmodelliermethode. Archiv f Mikroskop Anatomie 22:584–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Botha GSM (1957) The anatomy of phrenic nerve termination and the motor innervation of the diaphragm. Thorax 12:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glaser EM, Van der Loos H (1965) A semi-automatic computer-microscope for the analysis of neuronal morphology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 12:22–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gülekon N, Peker T, Liman F, Anıl A, Turgut H.B (2002) Demonstration of the nerve distribution of the extraocular muscles in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Cur Eye Res 25:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heimer L, Robards MJ (1981) Neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods. Plenum, New York, pp 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  7. His W (1887) Ueber die Methoden der plastischen Rekonstruktion und über deren Bedeutung für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Anat Anz 2:382–392

    Google Scholar 

  8. Homma T, Sakai T (1991) Ramification pattern of intermetacarpal branches of the deep branch (ramus profundus) of the ulnar nerve in the human hand. Acta Anat 141:139–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Homma T, Sakai T (1992) Thenar and hypothenar muscles and their innervation by the ulnar nerve and median nerves in the human hand. Acta Anat 145:44–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liem RSB, VanWilligen JD (1988) In toto staining and preservation of peripheral nervous tissue. Stain Technol 63:113–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu J, Kumar VP, Lau HK, Pereira BP, Shen Y, Pho RWH (1997) Neuromuscular compartments in the long head of triceps: a morphological study in rabbits. Muscle Nerve 20:897–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Kumar VP, Shen Y, Lau HK, Pereira BP, Pho RWH (1997) Modified Sihler’s technique for studying the distribution of intramuscular nerve branches in mammalian skeletal muscle. Anat Rec 247:137–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moody D, Lozanoff S (1999) Surf driver: rapid and reliable 3D reconstruction, Surf Driver 3.5 Manual

  14. Mu L, Sanders I (1998) Neuromuscular specializations of the pharyngeal dilator muscles: I. Compartments of the canine geniohyoid muscle. Anat Rec 250:146–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mu L, Sanders I (1999) Neuromuscular organization of the canine tongue. Anat Rec 256:412–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mu L, Sanders I (2000) Sensory nerve supply of the human oro- and laryngopharynx: a preliminary study. Anat Rec 258:406–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parratte B, Tatu L, Vuillier F, Diop M, Monnier G (2002) Intramuscular distribution of nerves in the human triceps surae muscle: anatomical bases for treatment of spastic drop foot with botulinum toxin. Surg Radiol Anat 24:91–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peker T, Turgut HB, Gülekon N, Anıl A (2001) Demonstration of the nerve distribution of the masticatory muscles in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Anat Histol Embryol 30:225–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peker T, Gülekon N, Anıl A, Turgut HB, Liman F (2003) Clearing and embedding in polyester resin for demonstrating the nerve distribution pattern of skeletal muscles. Biotech Histochem 78:187–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peker T, Gülekon N, Anıl A, Turgut HB, Karaköse M (2006) Observation of therelationship between the shape of skeletal muscle and their nerve distribution pattern: a transparent and microanatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:165–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sihler C (1895) Ueber Muskelspindeln und intramuskulare Nervendigungen bei Schlangen und Fröschen. Arch Mikros Anat Entwickl 46:709–723

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu BL, Sanders I (1992) A technique for demonstrating the nerve supply of whole larynges. Arc Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:822–827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadir Gülekon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gülekon, N., Peker, T., Turgut, H.B. et al. Qualitative comparison of anatomical microdissection, Sihler’s staining and computerized reconstruction methods for visualizing intramuscular nerve branches. Surg Radiol Anat 29, 373–378 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0225-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0225-1

Keywords

Navigation