Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing evapotranspiration and yield performance of maize under sprinkler, superficial and subsurface drip irrigation in a semi-arid environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In arid and semiarid environments, with shortage of water resources, maize production is competing for available water. This study analyzed the effect of different irrigation systems on maize yield, crop evapotranspiration and its components, i.e., canopy transpiration (T) and soil evaporation (E). A 2-year field experiment was conducted at the ITAP Research facilities located in Albacete (southeast Spain). Four treatments were assessed: surface drip irrigation with a spacing between drip lines of 1.5 m (SDI_1.5) and 0.75 m (SDI_0.75); subsurface drip irrigation (SubDI); solid set sprinkler irrigation (Sprink). In all treatments, irrigation was applied to refill the estimated potential water demand. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and E/T partitioning were estimated using a Simplified Two-Source Energy Balance (STSEB) approach. Although there was an important difference in the irrigation water applied between treatments, ranging from 743 and 722 for Sprink system to 534 and 495 for SubDI system in 2014 and 2015, respectively, yield was unaffected by the irrigation regime, resulting in an increase in the irrigation water productivity (IWP) by an average of 25% when irrigation was applied by the subsurface system. Maize ETc was affected by the irrigation system, with the SubDI achieving in 2015 a 39% reduction of seasonal ETc in comparison with the Sprink system. Similar reductions were obtained for separated E and T components with soil evaporation accounting in general for 15–20% of the total ETc. It is concluded that subsurface irrigation is a water savings strategy for irrigation of maize reducing the consumptive water use and increasing IWP. The final convenience for the widespread adoption of subsurface irrigation will depend on water availability and prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd El-Wahed MH, Ali EA (2013) Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit. Agric Water Manag 120:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 56, FAO, Rome

  • AQUASTAT (2015) FAO’s Global Information System on Water and Agriculture (online), Consultation. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/data/query/index.html?lang=en. Accessed 10 Jun 2019

  • Bozkurt Y, Yazar A, Gençel B, Sezen MS (2006) Optimum lateral spacing for drip-irrigated corn in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Agric Water Manag 85:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu LD, Liu JL, Zhu L, Luo SS, Chen XP, Li SQ, Hill R, Zhao Y (2013) The effects of mulching on maize growth, yield and water use in a semi-arid region. Agric Water Manag 123:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chávez JL, López-Urrea R (2019) One-step approach for estimating maize actual water use: part I. Modeling a variable surface resistance. Irrig Sci 37:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIHEAM. 2015. Statistical review. Agriculture, Food security, Society, Environment (online), Consultation. https://www.ciheam.org/uploads/attachments/70/CIHEAM_Statistical_Review_2015.pdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2019

  • Cihlar J, Dobson MC, Schmugge T, Hoogeboom P, Janse ARP, Baret F, Guyot G, Le Toan T, Pampaloni P (1987) Procedures for the description of agricultural crops and soils in optical and microwave remote sensing studies. Int J Rem Sens 8:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi PD, Kustas WP, Anderson MC, Agam N, Tolk JA, Evett SR, Howell TA, Gowda PH, O´Shaughnessy SA (2012) Two-source energy balance model estimates of evapotranspiration using component and composite surface temperatures. Adv Water Resour 50:134–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hendawy SE, Add El-Lattief EA, Ahmed MS, Schmidhalter U (2008) Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agric Water Manag 95:836–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exelis Visual Information Solutions (2012) ENVI User’s Guide. Boulder, Colorado: Exelis Visual Information Solutions, pages used, Boulder, CO

  • FAOSTAT (2017) FAO Statistical Database (online), Consultation. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 14 Jun 2019

  • Fereres E, Goldhamer DA, Parsons LA (2003) Irrigation water management of horticultural crops. HortSci 38:1036–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanli AM, Ebrahimizadeh MA, Beecham S (2009) The effects of irrigation methods with effluent and irrigation scheduling on water use efficiency and corn yields in an arid region. Agric Water Manag 96:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2012) Maize. In: Steduto P et al (eds) Crop yield responses to water stress, Paper 66. FAO, Rome, pp 114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p 32

  • Kustas WP, Alfieri JG, Anderson MC, Colaizzi PD, Prueger JH, Evett SR, Neale CMU, French AN, Hipps LE, Chávez JL, Copeland KS, Howell TA (2012) Evaluating the two-source energy balance model using local thermal and surface flux observations in a strongly advective irrigated agricultural area. Adv Water Resour 50:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm FR, Stone LR, Manges HL, O´Brian DM (1997) Optimum lateral spacing for subsurface drip-irrigated corn. Trans ASAE 40(4):1021–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, de Santa Martín, Olalla F, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A (2006) Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 85:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, Martínez-Molina L, de la Cruz F, Montoro A, González-Piqueras J, Odi-Lara M, Sánchez JM (2016) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of irrigated biomass sorghum for energy production. Irrig Sci 34:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payero JO, Tarkalson DD, Irmak S, Davison D, Petersen JL (2008) Effect of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 95:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ (1982) How a corn plant develops. Special Report No. 48, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service

  • Rodrigues GC, Paredes P, Gonçalves JM, Alves I, Pereira LS (2013) Comparing sprinkler and drip irrigation systems for full and deficit irrigated maize using multicriteria analysis and simulation modelling: ranking for water saving vs. farm economic return. Agric Water Manag 126:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio E, Caselles V, Coll C, Valor E, Sospedra F (2003) Thermal-infrared emissivities of natural surfaces: improvements on the experimental set-up and new measurements. Int J Remote Sens 24:5379–5390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, Kustas WP, Caselles V, Anderson M (2008) Modelling surface energy fluxes over maize using a two-source patch model and radiometric soil and canopy temperature observations. Remote Sens Environ 112:1130–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, López-Urrea R, Rubio E, Caselles V (2011) Determining water use of sorghum from two-source energy balance and radiometric temperatures. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3061–3070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, López-Urrea R, Rubio E, González-Piqueras J, Caselles V (2014) Assessing crop coefficients of sunflower and canola using two-source energy balance and thermal radiometry. Agric Water Manag 137:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, López-Urrea R, Doña C, Caselles V, González-Piqueras J, Niclós R (2015) Modeling evapotranspiration in a spring wheat from termal radiometry: crop coefficients and E/T partitioning. Irrig Sci 33:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, López-Urrea R, Valentín F, Caselles V, Galve J (2019) Lysimeter assessment of the simplified two-source energy balance model and eddy covariance system to estimate vineyard evapotranspiration. Agric For Meteorol 274:172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, 12th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigo IF, de Bruin H, Beyrich F, Bosveld FC, Gavilán P, Groh J, López-Urrea R (2018) Validation of reference evapotranspiration from Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) observations. Agric For Meteorol 259:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout TJ, DeJonge KC (2017) Water productivity of maize in the US high plains. Irrig Sci 35:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout TJ, DeJonge KC (2018) Crop water use and crop coefficients of maize in the great plains. J Irrig Drain Eng 144(6):04018009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project IPT-2012-0480-310000). The authors are particularly grateful to H. Picazo and J.A. de la Vara for their help during the fieldwork and data collection phase.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Técnico Agronómico Provincial (ITAP) and FUNDESCAM, Parque Empresarial Campollano, 2ª Avda. Nº. 61, 02007, Albacete, Spain

    F. Valentín & R. López-Urrea

  2. Departamento de Riego, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC) Espinardo, Murcia, Spain

    P. A. Nortes, D. S. Intrigliolo & J. J. Alarcón

  3. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos y de Montes, Centro Regional de Estudios del Agua (CREA), Campus Universitario s/n, 02071, Albacete, Spain

    A. Domínguez

  4. Department of Applied Physics, Regional Development Institute (IDR), Univ. of Castilla-La Mancha, Av. España, s/n, 02071, Albacete, Spain

    J. M. Sánchez

Authors
  1. F. Valentín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. A. Nortes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Domínguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. M. Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. S. Intrigliolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. J. Alarcón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. López-Urrea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. López-Urrea.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Ray G Anderson.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valentín, F., Nortes, P.A., Domínguez, A. et al. Comparing evapotranspiration and yield performance of maize under sprinkler, superficial and subsurface drip irrigation in a semi-arid environment. Irrig Sci 38, 105–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00657-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00657-z

Search

Navigation