Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulating deep drainage and nitrate leaching on a regional scale: implications for groundwater management in an intensively irrigated area

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater management in irrigation areas requires a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between agricultural management practices and the underlying groundwater resource. Unsaturated zone modelling can be used to predict rates of water and solute movement through the soil profile. By incorporating expert knowledge and measured data, it is possible to investigate the relative influence of management vs environmental factors on water and solute movement. The Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) has been applied to simulate the impacts of both environmental factors and agricultural management factors on deep drainage and nitrate leaching in the Lower Burdekin, North Queensland, Australia. Based on the results of this modelling, predicted annual average deep drainage rates were found to be controlled primarily by soil properties, irrigation scheduling, and, to a lesser extent, annual rainfall. The key factors which were found to control nitrate leaching were: irrigation water quality, fertilizer application rates, soil type, crop management, and irrigation scheduling. However, increases in the concentrations of nitrate in irrigation water resulted in a 64-fold increase in predicted nitrate-leaching rates, compared with a 22-fold increase in predicted nitrate-leaching rates associated with increased fertilizer application rates. As significant quantities of nitrate are predicted to be leached below the root zone, the immediate priority should be to increase monitoring of groundwater quality with a focus on quantifying the transport of nutrients to sensitive receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almasri MN, Kaluarachchi JJ (2007) Modeling nitrate contamination of groundwater in agricultural watersheds. J Hydrol 343:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker IS, Mohamed MAA, Hiyama T, Kato K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BBIFMAC (2012) GW Pixel Project: recognigition of nitrates in irrigation water on sugarcane farms in the lower Burdekin catchment. Burdekin Bowen Integrated Floodplain Management Advisory Committee (BBIFMAC Inc.), Ayr

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlke J-K (2002) Groundwater recharge and agricultural contamination. Hydrogeol J 10:153–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Waters D, Vardy S, Silburn DM, Attard S, Thorburn PJ, Davis AM, Halpin N, Schmidt M, Wilson B, Clark A (2012) A Paddock to reef monitoring and modelling framework for the Great Barrier Reef: Paddock and catchment component. Mar Pollut Bull 65:136–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth PB, Chinn C, Bristow KL, Ham GJ (2002) Healthy crop and healthy groundwater: sugarcane in the Burdekin delta. Irrigation Association of Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J (2004) Fan Delta geometry of the Lower Burdekin river system, North Queensland. In: Paper presented at the CRC LEME

  • Connolly RD, Freebairn DM, Bell MJ (1998) Change in soil infiltration associated with leys in south-eastern Queensland. Aust J Soil Res 36:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PG, Lamontagne S, Stieglitz TC, Cranswick R, Hancock G (2011) A re-evaluation of groundwater discharge from the Burdekin floodplain aquifer using geochemical tracers. National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Day K, Loi J, Christianos N (1992) Sodic soils: their characteristics and influence on the development of the Burdekin River Irrigation Area, North Queensland. In: First national conference and workshop on sodic soils. CSIRO, p 57

  • Di HJ, Cameron KC (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 64:237–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021471531188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnollan TE (1991) Understanding and managing Burdekin (BRIA) soils. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Felisa G, Ciriello V, Antonellini M, Di Federico V, Tartakovsky DM (2015) Data-driven models of groundwater salinization in coastal plains. J Hydrol 531:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding CR, Trueman JD, Alexander J (1996) Sedimentology of the Upper Burdekin River of North Queensland, Australia—an example of a tropical, variable discharge river. Terra Nova 8:447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding CR, Trueman JD, Alexander J (2005) Sharp-based, flood-dominated mouth bar sands from the Burdekin River delta of northeastern Australia: extending the spectrum of mouth-bar facies, geometry and stacking patterns. J Sedim Res 75:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EA, Shaw RJ, Smith GD, Coughlan KJ (1984) Plant available water capacity: concept, measurement and prediction. In: Paper presented at the properties and utilization of cracking clay soils. University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 1981

  • Hadas A, Kautsky L, Goek M, Kara EE (2004) Rates of decomposition of plant residues and available nitrogen in soil, related to residue composition through simulation of carbon and nitrogen turnover. Soil Biol Biochem 36:255–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ham GJ, Cox AZ, McMahon GG (1997) A review of sodic soils research in the queensland sugar industry. In: Proceedings of Australian Society of sugar cane technologists, pp 200–207

  • Hashemi F, Olesen JE, Hansen AL, Børgesen CD, Dalgaard T (2018) Spatially differentiated strategies for reducing nitrate loads from agriculture in two Danish catchments. J Environ Manag 208:77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holden JR (1998) Irrigation of sugarcane. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Indooroopilly

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzworth D et al (2014) APSIM—evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environ Model Softw 62:327–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubble GD, Thompson CH (1953) The soils and land use potential of the Lower Burdekin Valley, North Queensland. CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Bamber NG, Smith DM (2005) Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Res 92:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ES (1994) Mineralization-immobilization of nitrogen in soil amended with low C:N ratio plant residues with different particle sizes. Soil Biol Biochem 26:519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A&M University Press, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating BA et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Tariq R, Yuanlai C, Blackwell J (2006) Can irrigation be sustainable? Agric Water Manag 80:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köck-Schulmeyer M, Ginebreda A, Postigo C, Garrido T, Fraile J, López de Alda M, Barceló D (2014) Four-year advanced monitoring program of polar pesticides in groundwater of Catalonia (NE-Spain). Sci Total Environ 470–471:1087–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes JG, Van Dam JC, Groenendijk P, Hendriks RFA, Jacobs CMJ (2008) SWAP version 3.2. Theory description and user manual. Alterra and Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman D, Shapira RH, Bar-Tal A, Fine P, Russo D (2013) Nitrate fluxes to groundwater under citrus orchards in a Mediterranean climate: observations, calibrated models, simulations and agro-hydrological conditions. J Contam Hydrol 151:93–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman D, Baram S, Dahan O (2016) Soil-aquifer phenomena affecting groundwater under vertisols: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littleboy M (1997) Spatial generalisation of biophysical simulation models for quantitative land evaluation: a case study for dryland wheat growing areas of Queensland. PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia

  • McIntyre DS (1974) Water retention and the moisture characteristic. In: Loveday J (ed) Methods for analysis of irrigated soils. Technical communication, vol 54. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier E, Thorburn P (2017) Long term sugarcane crop residue retention offers limited potential to reduce nitrogen fertilizer rates in Australian wet tropical environments. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mockus V (1972) Chapter 10, Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. In: SCS National engineering handbook, section 4, hydrology. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, pp 10.11–10.24

  • Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Wood AW, Keating BA (1996) Effect of nitrogen on the time-course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Field Crops Res 47:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PN, Ham GJ (2001) Diagnosis and management of sodic soils under sugarcane. CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre RCM, Rotunno Filho OC, Mansur WJ, Nobre MMM, Cosenza CAN (2007) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. J Contam Hydrol 94:277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northcote KH, Skene JKM (1972) Australian soils with saline and sodic properties. CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker P et al (2002) Progress in integrated assessment and modelling 1A summary of a workshop on integrated assessment and modelling, held at EcoSummit 2000: integrating the sciences, Halifax, June 18–22, 2000. See Costanza and Jorgensen (2001) for a further report on Ecosummit. 1. Environ Model Softw 17:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00059-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peralta JM, Stöckle CO (2001) Nitrate from an irrigated crop rotation at the Pasco-Quincy area (Washington, USA) available for groundwater contamination: a long-term simulation study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petharam C, Bristow KL, Nelson PN (2008) Understanding and managing groundwater and salinity in a tropical conjunctive water use irrigation district. Agric Water Manag 95:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Harrison SR, Wegener MK, Bristow KL (2002) Irrigation water pricing and farm profitability in the Burdekin Delta sugarcane area. In: Paper presented at the IAA conference, Sydney, Australia

  • Rasiah V, Armour JD, Cogle AL (2005) Assessment of variables controlling nitrate dynamics in groundwater: is it a threat to surface aquatic ecosystems? Mar Pollut Bull 51:60–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reading LP, Lockington DA, Bristow KL, Baumgartl T (2010) Impacts of sodic soil amelioration on hydraulic conductivity and deep drainage in the Lower Burdekin. In: Paper presented at the one water, many futures, Sydney, Australia, 8–10 June 2010

  • Reading LP, Baumgartl T, Bristow KL, Lockington DA (2012) Hydraulic conductivity increases in a sodic clay soil in response to gypsum applications: impacts of bulk density and cation exchange. Soil Sci J 177:165–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reading LP, Lockington DA, Bristow KL, Baumgartl T (2015) Are we getting accurate measurements of Ksat for sodic clay soils? Agric Water Manag 158:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivett MO, Buss SR, Morgan P, Smith JWN, Bemment CD (2008) Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: a review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Res 42:4215–4232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MJ, Inman-Bamber NG, Muchow RC, Wood AW (1999) Physiological analysis of early season deficit and sugarcane productivity. Field Crops Res 64:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (2001) Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoups G, Hopmans JW, Tanji KK (2006) Evaluation of model complexity and space-time resolution on the prediction of long-term soil salinity dynamics, western San Joaquin Valley, California. Hydrol Process 20:2647–2668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon EL, Holden JR, Raine R (1996) Adoption of improved irrigation practices by Burdekin Canegrowers. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Evaporation and irrigation scheduling, San Antonio, Texas. ASAE, Washington, pp 214–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Simunek J, van Genuchten MT, Sejna M (2008) Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages and related codes. Vadose Zone J 7:587–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh PN, Shukla SK, Bhatnagar VK (2007) Optimizing soil moisture regime to increase water use efficiency of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) in subtropical India. Agric Water Manag 90:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp CP, Van Cappellen P (2004) Nutrient inputs to the coastal ocean through submarine groundwater discharge: controls and potential impact. J Hydrol 295:64–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.02.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding RF, Exner ME (1993) Occurrence of nitrate in groundwater—a review. J Environ Qual 22:392–402. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030002x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart LK, Charlesworth PB, Bristow KL, Thorburn PJ (2006) Estimating deep drainage and nitrate leaching from the root zone under sugarcane using APSIM-SWIM. Agric Water Manag 81:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz TC (2005) Submarine groundwater discharge into the near-shore zone of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 51:51–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thayalakumaran T, Bristow KL, Charlesworth PB, Fass T (2008) Geochemical conditions in groundwater systems: implications for the attenuation of agricultural nitrate. Agric Water Manag 95:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Shaw RJ (1987) Effects of different dispersion and fine fraction determination methods on results of routine particle-size analysis. Aust J Soil Res 25:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Collins K, Probert ME (2010) Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:343–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Attard SJ, Kemei J (2011) Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: nitrogen lost through runoff and leaching. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Wilkinson SN, Silburn DM (2013) Water quality in agricultural lands draining to the Great Barrier Reef: a review of causes, management and priorities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:4–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn P, Biggs JS, Palmer J, Meier E, Verburg K, Skocaj D (2017) Prioritizing crop management to increase nitrogen use efficiency in Australian sugarcane crops. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum MK et al (2008) Integrated assessment of agricultural systems—a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agric Syst 96:150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Butcher AS, Stuart ME, Gooddy DC, Bloomfield JP (2013) The nitrate time bomb: a numerical way to investigate nitrate storage and lag time in the unsaturated zone. Environ Geochem Health 35:667–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns D, Oster JD (2006) Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial. Agric Water Manag 86:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. P. Reading.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Li.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 123 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reading, L.P., Bajracharya, K. & Wang, J. Simulating deep drainage and nitrate leaching on a regional scale: implications for groundwater management in an intensively irrigated area. Irrig Sci 37, 561–581 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00636-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00636-4

Navigation