Skip to main content
Log in

Improving on-farm water management through an irrigation scheduling service

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Irrigation scheduling services (ISS) provide farmers with recommendations on timing and amount of irrigation, thus contributing to improving on-farm water management. There are wide variations in the level of services, from providing regional water use guidelines to local, on-farm advisory services. An ISS (ISS-ITAP) was created in 1988 in Albacete, Central Spain, a province encompassing 100,000 ha which are irrigated mostly with groundwater. The ISS-ITAP first offered general information on crop water requirements (ET), and after 1994 field-specific scheduling services were provided to growers. By 2005 the ISS-ITAP had expanded its services to over 33,500 ha, corresponding to about 30% of the irrigable area. The evolution of irrigation performance in a number of individual farms was followed over 10 years, and it was found that the proportion of fields which were adequately irrigated increased from 50 to over 70% in that period. Meanwhile, the proportion of deficit-irrigated fields declined from 20 to 10%, while the proportion of over-irrigated fields which also had initially decreased from 20 to 10%, went back to 20% at the end of the study period. To assess the benefits and costs of the ISS-ITAP, a comparison of the yields achieved in the scheduled farms against those obtained in the rest of the province was carried out. When the Service was evaluated in economic terms, using information from 2003, the pay-back was 2 years and the internal rate of return was 59.1%, highlighting the high returns on the public funds invested by ISS-ITAP to provide irrigation advisory service to growers in the Albacete province.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam M, Duke HR, Orendorff W (1996) ET information used by Colorado farmers. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 626–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 56, Rome, 300 pp

  • Bjornlund H, Nicol L, Klein KK (2009) The adoption of improved irrigation technology and management practices-a study of two irrigation districts in Alberta, Canada. Agric Water Manage 96:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch BE, Humpherys AS, Young D (1981) How scheduling fits in the irrigation program in the grand valley of Colorado. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockter DT (1996) AgriMet-the pacific northwest cooperative agricultural weather station network. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 870–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 24(rev), FAO, 144 pp

  • Eching S (2002) Role of technology in irrigation advisory services: the CIMIS experience. In: Proceeding of workshop on irrigation advisory services and participatory extension in irrigation management. FAO-ICID, Montreal, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • English M, Solomon K, Hoffman G (2002) A paradigm shift in irrigation management. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE, pp 267–277

  • Faci JM, Bensaci A, Slatni A, Playán E (2000) A case study for irrigation modernisation. I. characterisation of the district and analysis of water delivery records. Agric Water Manage 42:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E (1996) Irrigation scheduling and its impact on the 21st century. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean- type environment. I. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Aust J Agric Res 35:743–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith H, Bird JD, Howarth SE (1988) Computerised irrigation scheduling using spreadsheet models. Irrigat Drain Syst 2:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Dugo MP, Mateos L (2008) Spectral vegetation indices for benchmarking water productivity of irrigated cotton and sugarbeet crops. Agric Water Manage 95:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J 93:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MJ (1981) Summary and challenges. In: Proceedings of the ASAE’s irrigation scheduling conference, Irrigation scheduling for water & energy conservation in the 80s, Am Soc Agric Engr St. Joseph, ASAE Publications 23–81, pp 225–231

  • Klocke NL, Schneedloth JP, Watts DG (1996) Leaching from best irrigation management in semi-arid climate. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 769–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Leib B, Elliott T, Matthews G (2001) WISE: a web-linked and producer oriented program for irrigation scheduling. Agric Water Manag 33:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Leib B, Hattendorf M, Elliott T, Matthews G (2002) Adoption and adaptation of scientific irrigation scheduling: trends from Washington, USA as of 1998. Agric Water Manag 55:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López Urrea R (2004). Evapotranspiración de Referencia: Métodos de cálculo y de medición directa en una estación lisimétrica en ambientes semiáridos. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete

  • Lorite I, Mateos L, Fereres E (2004) Evaluating irrigation performance in a Mediterranean environment. II. Variability among crops and farmers. Irrig Sci 23:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyford G, Schild N (1981) The water management and conservation program in Yolo County, California. In: Phene CJ, Stegman EC (eds) Proceedings of an irrigation scheduling conference on irrigation scheduling for water and energy conservation in the 1980s. ASAE, Chicago, pp 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Malano H, Burton M (2001) Guidelines for benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector. Proceedings of international programme for technology and research in irrigation and drainage, FAO, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y alimentación) (2004) Anuario de Estadística Agraria 2004. http://www.mapa.es/es/estadistica/pags/anuario/Anu_04/indice.asp. Accessed 3 March 2005

  • Martín de Santa Olalla F, Brasa A, Fabeiro C, Fernández González D, López Córcoles H (1999) Improvement of irrigation management towards the sustainable use of groundwater in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Agric Water Manag 40:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoro A (2008) Avances en el manejo del agua en la agricultura de riego. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete

  • Montoro A, López Fuster P (2005a) Informe técnico para la toma de decisiones en el “plan de explotación 2005”, de la unidad hidogeológica de la mancha oriental. In: AP IT (ed) Anuario Técnico ITAP. Albacete, España, pp 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoro A, López Fuster P (2005b) Los Servicios de asesoramiento de Riegos: el ejemplo del SAR de Albacete. In: de Martín Santa Olalla F, López Fuster P, Calera A (eds) Agua y Agronomía. Madrid, Spain, pp 435–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoro A, López Córcoles H, López Fuster P (2002) An advisory service for irrigation in the plains of La Mancha, Spain. Proceeding of workshop on irrigation advisory services and participatory extension in irrigation management. FAO-ICID, Montreal, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HV, Nieber JL, Misra D (1996) Modeling BMP impacts on ground water quality. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 762–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega JF, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM (2005) Improving water management: the irrigation advisory service of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Agric Water Manag 77:37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao G, Zhao L, Klein KK (2009) Water user associations in inner Mongolia: factors that influence farmers to join. Agric Water Manag 96:822–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones P, Unland H, Ojeda W, Sifuentes E (1999) Transfer of irrigation scheduling technology in Mexico. Agric Water Manag 40:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Angus JF (2006) Benchmarking water-use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments. Aust J Agr Res 57:847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer MN, Vomocil J (1981) Twenty-five years of modern irrigation scheduling promotional efforts. In: Phene CJ, Stegman EC (eds) Proceedings of an irrigation scheduling conference on irrigation scheduling for water and energy conservation in the 1980s. ASAE, Chicago, pp 208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva WLC, Marouelli WA (1996) Evaluation of irrigation scheduling techniques for processing tomatoes in Brazil. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 522–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Muñoz G (2002) Irrigation advisory services for effective water use. A review of experiences. Proceeding of workshop on irrigation advisory services and participatory extension in irrigation management. FAO-ICID, Montreal, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 10th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm GG (1967) Problems and procedures in determining water supply requirements for irrigation projects. In: Hagan et al. (eds) Irrigation of agricultural lands. Wisconsin, Amer Soc Agron Agronomy II

  • Tacker P, Ashlock L, Vories E, Earnest L, Cingolani R, Beaty D, Hayden C (1996) Field demonstration of arkansas irrigation scheduling program. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, San Antonio, pp 974–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesey N (2003) Improving irrigation efficiency though technological adoption: when will it conserve water? In: Alsharhan AS, Wood WW (eds) Water resources perspectives: evaluation, management and policy. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 53–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study and the whole ISS-ITAP were financially supported since its inception by the Diputación Provincial de Albacete, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. E.F. also acknowledges the support of the Consolider-Rideco grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Montoro.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Kijne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montoro, A., López-Fuster, P. & Fereres, E. Improving on-farm water management through an irrigation scheduling service. Irrig Sci 29, 311–319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0235-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0235-3

Keywords

Navigation