Abstract
Purpose
Prompt endovascular treatment of patients with stroke due to intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) is a major challenge in rural areas because neurointerventionalists are usually not available. As a result, treatment is delayed, and clinical outcomes are worse compared with patients primarily treated in comprehensive stroke centers (CSC). To address this problem, we present a concept in which interdisciplinary, on-site endovascular treatment is performed in a Primary Stroke Center (PSC) by a team of interventional neuroradiologists and cardiologists: the Rendez-Vous approach.
Methods
Thirty-five patients with LVO who underwent interdisciplinary thrombectomy on-site at the PSC as part of the Rendez-Vous concept were compared with 72 patients who were transferred from a PSCs to the CSC for thrombectomy when diagnosed with LVO in terms of temporal sequences and clinical outcomes.
Results
Patients treated on-site at the PSC as part of the Rendez-Vous approach were managed as successfully and without an increase in complication rates compared with patients treated secondarily at a CSC (91.7% successful interventions in Rendez-Vous vs. 87.3% in control group, p = 0.57). The time from diagnosis of LVO to groin puncture was reduced by mean 74.3 min with the Rendez-Vous concept (p < 0.01). Regarding the clinical outcome, a functionally independent status was achieved in 45.5% in the Rendez-Vous group and in 22.6% in the control group (p = 0.029).
Conclusion
Thanks to interdisciplinary teamwork between cardiology and interventional neuroradiology in local PSCs, times to successful reperfusion can be reduced. This has a potentially positive impact on the clinical outcome of stroke patients.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Due to the results of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become an elementary component of stroke therapy in the case of Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Triggered by the introduction of IVT [8], a dense network of Primary Stroke Centers (PSC), often run by internists (mostly cardiologists) could be established in Germany with the primary aim to initiate IVT as soon as possible [9]. Due to the lack of availability of interventional neuroradiologists, the standard approach to treat patients with LVO is to transfer them to a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) eventually after initiation of IVT (drip-and-ship model). However, this approach consumes considerable time, which has unfavorable impact on patient outcome [10].
In the past years, some centers followed the approach of not transferring the patient to the CSC for MT, but rather bringing the neurointerventionalist to the PSC so that MT can be performed on-site [11,12,13,14]. Here, considerable time can be saved [11, 14].
Although the cardiologists cover a wide range of interventional angiographic skills, these skills have so far remained unused in similar projects in the field of interventional stroke therapy [14]. No other medical specialty has such a dense network of acutely available angiography sites including the necessary staff in Germany.
To ensure optimal and fastest possible treatment of stroke patients, we have decided in the concept presented here to cooperate very closely with the specialty of internal medicine, also with regard to endovascular procedures. The special feature of the Rendez-Vous concept is that the internist already starts the procedure of MT before the neuroradiologist is physically present in the partner clinic. Even before the neuroradiologist arrives at the PSC, the main tasks of the on-site team, led by the cardiologist, are to transport the patient to the cardiac catheterization lab, initiate anesthesia unless otherwise discussed, prepare materials, and then also to perform arterial vascular puncture with placement of a sheath and insertion of catheters as arranged with the neuroradiologist by phone. If possible, the cardiologist can also start probing the supra-aortic vessels. Ideally, by the time the neuroradiologist arrives at the PSC, preparations have progressed to the point where only the intracranial thrombectomy itself needs to be performed.
In the current study, we aim to analyze a possible time benefit of the Rendez-Vous approach (intervention group) over the drip-and-ship technique (control group) and, moreover, to compare the technical and clinical outcomes.
Materials and Methods
For more detailed information about the methods please read supplemental materials.
Inclusion criteria were acutely symptomatic occlusions of the intradural internal carotid artery (ICA), M1-segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), proximal M2-segment of the MCA or, occlusion of the basilar artery (BA); see Table 1.
Patients underwent endovascular treatment either in a drip-and-ship concept (control group) in the CSC or on-site in the PSC (Rendez-Vous concept). The two cohorts were compared on the basis of technical and clinical outcome parameters. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Results
The two groups do not differ regarding the patients age, sex, stroke severity (admission NIHSS), occlusion site, and the rate of IVT.
There was no difference regarding interventional treatment success like necessary maneuvers, postinterventional reperfusion, and peri-interventional complications between both groups (see also Table 1). None of the periprocedural complications in the Rendez-Vous group occurred while the cardiologist was alone at the table. The two complications occurred during intracranial thrombectomy by the neuroradiologist, with the cardiologist merely assisting.
A major finding was a reduced onset-to-groin time in the Rendez-Vous group (210.3 min vs. 256.0 min, p = 0.037), which was achieved by a significantly shorter time from imaging to groin puncture compared with the control group (91.9 vs. 166.2 min, p < 0.01), see also Fig. 1. The Rendez-Vous group had a greater proportion of patients with functional independence at 90 days (mRS 90 0–2: 45.5% in Rendez-Vous approach vs. 22.6% in control group, p = 0.029), see also Table 1.
Discussion
The core idea of the Rendez-Vous approach is that interventional cardiology is directly and actively involved in endovascular, interventional stroke procedures. There is a significant time advantage to be gained by active involvement of interventional cardiology, as many on-site activities can be completed by the cardiologist before the (neuro-)radiologist arrives at the scene. Important steps can be taken before the neurointerventionalist arrives.
Not surprisingly, based on previous papers, the technical success rates and periprocedural complications of on-site Rendez-Vous interventions are comparable to those of interventions in the CSC [14, 15]. An important basic requirement is that only experienced interventionalists should be engaged for remote thrombectomies, as these procedures can be more challenging than procedures performed in the familiar setting of the CSC. On the one hand, this concerns the success rate as well as complication management.
Some concern existed at least in Germany among interventional (neuro-)radiologists in the past that interventional stroke care might shift into the area of responsibility of cardiologists. These concerns were mainly based on the similarity of interventional techniques combined with an excellent infrastructure regarding the interventional treatment of myocardial infarction, even in rural areas. In this respect, the interventional cardiologists are busy with cardiological patients in terms of expertise and capacity. An effort to completely take over endovascular stroke treatment is not foreseeable, also with regard to the fact that the number of cases in such primary stroke units is too low for sufficient training including complication management and treatment of very complex cases to take place. To date, stroke medicine in Germany has failed to provide timely on-site thrombectomy in all rural stroke units at all times. However, since MT is a very important treatment modality for ischemic stroke, a suitable concept for each SU must be developed on how to ensure timely MT for patients with LVO. The Rendez-Vous concept could make a contribution for selective PSCs, especially in rural areas. In conjunction with mobile, (neuro-)radiologist thrombectomy services, nationwide coverage of endovascular stroke treatments in rural areas could be further improved. Here, the Rendez-Vous approach could also be integrated into existing mobile stroke services [14] aiming at better outcome for patients suffering severe ischemic stroke caused by LVO.
Our study has several limitations as it is a retrospective approach with small sample size. At this point, we would like to point out a possible selection bias which we cannot completely exclude. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit of the Rendez-Vous concept exceeds the benefit of the Flying Interventionalist concept [16]. The reason for this is not completely clear. However, the “Teleskop” network represents a very special care concept in which daily telemedical or on-site visits take place to be able to provide optimal neurological and neuroradiological support even during the postinterventional course. It is likely that the better outcome is attributable to better postinterventional care. Such a complex care is hardly feasible in large stroke networks with their limited staff and a high number of new teleconsultations every day. It is certainly worth discussing whether health policy makers should acknowledge that the staffing requirements for good telemedicine care are much greater than currently funded.
A total of five patients from Weilheim were included in the control group and were not treated on-site at the PSC as part of the Rendez-Vous concept. In principle, a selection bias could be suspected here. However, three of the five patients had already been treated shortly before the initiation of the Rendez-Vous project, so that an on-site thrombectomy was not possible here. Two additional thrombectomies could not be treated at the PSC for personnel reasons. In one case, the neuroradiologist who was on telestroke duty was acutely ill; in the other case, the cardiac catheterization was occupied by an acute myocardial infarction with coronary intervention. In this respect, we do not consider the data to be significantly biased by these five cases.
Moreover, it cannot be excluded that complications could occur due to the initial activity of the cardiologist, even before the arrival of the neuroradiologist, although this was not the case in the present study. To reduce this risk, the cardiologists were intensively trained in advance about the specific neuroradiological aspects of the procedures. This includes the careful flushing of all inserted catheters. In the Rendez-Vous group analyzed here, in only two cases did the cardiologist have sufficient time before the arrival of the neuroradiologist to begin probing the common carotid artery as an access vessel on his own. Of course, it is conceivable that vascular injuries such as dissections may occur. However, this risk is potentially just as present when neuroradiologists probe these vessels. Ultimately, larger-scale studies will show whether complication rates remain at a low level with this interdisciplinary care concept.
Conclusion
Interdisciplinary on-site collaboration of interventional (neuro-)radiology and cardiology allows faster cerebral reperfusion therapies in the PSC compared to the standard approach of secondary patient transfers and thrombectomy in the CSC. Supported by close, telemedical, pre- and postinterventional follow-up, a clinical advantage for the Rendez-Vous concept could be demonstrated. This approach might help to further improve stroke care, especially in rural areas.
Abbreviations
- CSC:
-
Comprehensive Stroke Center
- CT:
-
Computed Tomography
- DSA:
-
Digital Subtraction Angiography
- ENT:
-
Embolization to new territory
- EVT:
-
Endovascular treatment
- ICA:
-
Internal carotid artery
- IVT:
-
Intravenous thrombolysis
- LVO:
-
Large vessel occlusion
- MT:
-
Mechanical thrombectomy
- MR:
-
Magnetic Resonance
- NIHSS:
-
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
- PSC:
-
Primary Stroke Center
- RCT:
-
Randomized Controlled Trials
- TELESKOP:
-
Telemedizinisches Netzwerk kooperierender Kliniken in Bayern
- SU:
-
Stroke Unit
References
Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, Yan B, Dowling RJ, Parsons MW, Oxley TJ, Wu TY, Brooks M, Simpson MA, Miteff F, Levi CR, Krause M, Harrington TJ, Faulder KC, Steinfort BS, Priglinger M, Ang T, Scroop R, Barber PA, McGuinness B, Wijeratne T, Phan TG, Chong W, Chandra RV, Bladin CF, Badve M, Rice H, De Villiers L, Ma H, Desmond PM, Donnan GA, Davis SM. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18.
Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener H-C, Levy EI, Pereira VM, Albers GW, Cognard C, Cohen DJ, Hacke W, Jansen O, Jovin TG, Mattle HP, Nogueira RG, Siddiqui AH, Yavagal DR, Baxter BW, Devlin TG, Lopes DK, Reddy VK, De Du Mesnil Rochemont R, Singer OC, Jahan R. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95.
Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, Van Den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, Van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, Van Oostayen JA, LycklamaÀNijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, De Bruijn SF, Van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, Van Dijk EJ, De Vries J, De Kort PLM, Van Rooij WJJ, Van Den Berg JSP, Van Hasselt BAAM, Aerden LAM, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JCJ, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder THCML, Heijboer RJJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, Den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, Van Den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers MES, Jenniskens SFM, Beenen LFM, Van Den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, Van Zwam WH, Roos YBWEM, Van Der Lugt A, Van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CBLM, Dippel DWJ. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20.
Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD, Investigators ET. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30.
Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, San Roman L, Serena J, Abilleira S, Ribo M, Millan M, Urra X, Cardona P, Lopez-Cancio E, Tomasello A, Castano C, Blasco J, Aja L, Dorado L, Quesada H, Rubiera M, Hernandez-Perez M, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, von Kummer R, Gallofre M, Davalos A, Investigators RT. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296–306.
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–418.
Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017–25.
National Institute of Neurological D, Stroke rt PASSG. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7.
Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL. Telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care G. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(9):742–8.
Prothmann S, Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Reith W, Niederstadt T, Felber A, Kurre W. Acute recanalization of thrombo-embolic ischemic stroke with pREset (ARTESp): the impact of occlusion time on clinical outcome of directly admitted and transferred patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(9):817–22.
Hubert GJ, Kraus F, Maegerlein C, Platen S, Friedrich B, Kain HU, Witton-Davies T, Hubert ND, Zimmer C, Bath PM, Audebert HJ, Haberl RL. The “flying intervention team”: a novel stroke care concept for rural areas. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;50(4):375–82.
Wei D, Oxley TJ, Nistal DA, Mascitelli JR, Wilson N, Stein L, Liang J, Turkheimer LM, Morey JR, Schwegel C, Awad AJ, Shoirah H, Kellner CP, De Leacy RA, Mayer SA, Tuhrim S, Paramasivam S, Mocco J, Fifi JT. Mobile interventional stroke teams lead to faster treatment times for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion. Stroke. 2017;48(12):3295–300.
Morey JR, Oxley TJ, Wei D, Kellner CP, Dangayach NS, Stein L, Hom D, Wheelwright D, Rubenstein L, Skliut M, Shoirah H, De Leacy RA, Singh IP, Zhang X, Persaud S, Tuhrim S, Dhamoon M, Bederson J, Mocco J, Fifi JT. Mount sinai stroke I. Mobile interventional stroke team model improves early outcomes in large vessel occlusion stroke: The NYC MIST trial. Stroke. 2020;51(12):3495–503.
Kettner A, Schlachetzki F, Boeckh-Behrens T, Zimmer C, Wunderlich S, Kraus F, Haberl RL, Hubert GJ, Boy S, Henninger J, Friedrich B, Maegerlein C. Feasibility, safety, and technical success of the flying intervention team in acute ischemic stroke : comparison of interventions in different primary stroke centers with those in a comprehensive stroke center. Clin Neuroradiol 2022.
Friedrich B, Maegerlein C, Lobsien D, Monch S, Berndt M, Hedderich D, Wunderlich S, Michalski D, Lehm M, Boeckh-Behrens T, Zimmer C, Kreiser K. Endovascular stroke treatment on single-plane vs bi-plane angiography suites: technical considerations and evaluation of treatment success. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019;29(2):303–9.
Hubert GJ, Hubert ND, Maegerlein C, Kraus F, Wiestler H, Muller-Barna P, Gerdsmeier-Petz W, Degenhart C, Hohenbichler K, Dietrich D, Witton-Davies T, Regler A, Paternoster L, Leitner M, Zeman F, Koller M, Linker RA, Bath PM, Audebert HJ, Haberl RL. Association between use of a flying intervention team vs patient interhospital transfer and time to endovascular thrombectomy among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Nonurban Germany. JAMA. 2022;327(18):1795–805.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krug, N., Braun, H., Knez, A. et al. Interdisciplinary Rendez-Vous Approach in Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A New Concept to Accelerate Mechanical Thrombectomy in Primary Stroke Centers. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 47, 109–114 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03610-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03610-y