Skip to main content
Log in

Replacement of Mushroom Cage Gastrostomy Tube Using a Modified Technique to Allow Percutaneous Replacement with an Endoscopic Tube in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiologic inserted gastrostomy (RIG) is the preferred method in our institution for enteral feeding in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Skin-level primary-placed mushroom cage gastrostomy tubes become tight with weight gain. We describe a minimally invasive radiologic technique for replacing mushroom gastrostomy tubes with endoscopic mushroom cage tubes in ALS. All patients with ALS who underwent replacement of a RIG tube were included. Patients were selected for a modified replacement when the tube length of the primary placed RIG tube was insufficient to allow like-for-like replacement. Replacement was performed under local anesthetic and fluoroscopic guidance according to a preset technique, with modification of an endoscopic mushroom cage gastrostomy tube to allow percutaneous placement. Assessment of the success, safety, and durability of the modified technique was undertaken. Over a 60-month period, 104 primary placement mushroom cage tubes in ALS were performed. A total of 20 (19.2%) of 104 patients had a replacement tube positioned, 10 (9.6%) of 104 with the modified technique (male n = 4, female n = 6, mean age 65.5 years, range 48–85 years). All tubes were successfully replaced using this modified technique, with two minor complications (superficial wound infection and minor hemorrhage). The mean length of time of tube durability was 158.5 days (range 6–471 days), with all but one patient dying with a functional tube in place. We have devised a modification to allow percutaneous replacement of mushroom cage gastrostomy feeding tubes with minimal compromise to ALS patients. This technique allows tube replacement under local anesthetic, without the need for sedation, an important consideration in ALS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Desport JC, Preux PM, Truong TC et al (2000) Nutritional assessment and survival in ALS patients. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1:91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasarskis EJ, Berryman S, Vanderleest JG et al (1996) Nutritional status of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: relation to the proximity of death. Am J Clin Nutrit 63:130–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desport JC, Preux PM, Truong TC et al (1999) Nutritional status is a prognostic factor for survival in ALS patients. Neurology 53:1059–1065

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron R, Rosenfield J (2002) Nutritional issues and supplements in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 5:631–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borasio GD, Voltz R, Miller RG (2001) Palliative care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Clin North Am 19:829–847

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard RS, Orrell RW (2002) Management of motor neurone disease. Postgrad Med J 78:736–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw AS, Ampong MA, Rio A et al (2004) Entristar skin-level gastrostomy tube: primary placement with radiologic guidance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Radiology 233:392–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis D, Ampong MA et al (2009) Mushroom-cage gastrostomy tube placement in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a 5-year experience in 104 patients in a single institution. Eur Radiol 19:1763–1771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Funaki B, Zaleski GX, Lorenz J et al (2000) Radiologic gastrostomy placement: pigtail-versus mushroom-retained catheters. Am J Roentgenol 175:375–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodges EG, Morano JU, Nowicki MJ (2001) The buried bumper syndrome complicating percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 33:326–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boreham B, Ammori BJ (2002) Laparoscopic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy removal in a patient with buried-bumper syndrome: a new approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:356–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rio A, Ampong MA, Turner MR et al (2005) Comparison of two percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in the nutritional management of ALS patients. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 6:177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfsen HC, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ et al (1990) Long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1120–1122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Omary RA, Bettman MA, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S293–S295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mazzini L, Corra T, Zaccala M et al (1995) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and enteral nutrition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 242:695–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chio A, Finocchiaro E, Meineri P et al (1999) Safety and factors related to survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in ALS. Neurology 53:1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathus-Vliegen L, Louwerse L, Merkus M et al (1994) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and impaired pulmonary function. Gastrointest Endosc 40:463–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Forbes RB, Colville S, Swingler RJ (2004) Frequency, timing and outcome of gastrostomy tubes for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease. A record linkage study from the Scottish Motor Neurone Disease Register. J Neurol 251:813–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller RG, Rosenberg JA, Gelinas DF R et al (1999) Practice parameter: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 52:1311–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw AS, Ampong MA, Rio A et al (2006) Survival of patients with ALS following institution of enteral feeding is related to pre-procedure oximetry: a retrospective review of 98 patients in a single centre. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 7:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chio A, Galletti R, Finocchiaro C et al (2004) Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy: a safe and effective method of nutritional tube placement in advanced ALS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 75:645–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lyall RA, Donaldson N, Polkey MI et al (2001) Respiratory muscle strength and ventilatory failure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 124:2000–2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wollman B, D’Agostino HB, Walus-Wigle JR et al (1995) Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Radiology 197:699–704

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bell SD, Carmody EA, Yeung EY et al (1995) Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy: additional experience in 519 procedures. Radiology 194:817–820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lyon RM, Haslam PJ, Duke DM et al (2003) De novo placement of button gastrostomy catheters in an adult population: experience in 53 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1283–1289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dinkel H-P, Beer KT, Triller J et al (2002) Establishing radiological percutaneous gastrostomy with ballon-retained tubes as an alternative to endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy in patients with tumours of the head and neck or oesophagus. Br J Radiol 75:371–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Funaki B, Pierce R, Lorenz J et al (2001) Comparison of balloon- and mushroom-retained large-bore gastrostomy catheters. Am J Roentgenol 177:359–362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McLoughlin RF, Gibney RG (1994) Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy: tube function and malfunction. Abdom Imaging 19:195–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laasch HU, Martin DF (2006) Mushroom retained gastrostomy: the way forward. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yip D, Vanasco M, Funaki B (2004) Complication rates and patency of radiologically guided mushroom gastrostomy, balloon gastrostomy, and gastrojejunostomy: a review of 250 procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul S. Sidhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ammar, T., Rio, A., Ampong, M.A. et al. Replacement of Mushroom Cage Gastrostomy Tube Using a Modified Technique to Allow Percutaneous Replacement with an Endoscopic Tube in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33, 590–595 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9763-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9763-8

Keywords

Navigation