Skip to main content
Log in

Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy: Tube function and malfunction

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe our experience with fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy, assessing in particular the functional performance of inserted tubes. We also examine the ability of radiological investigations to detect intraperitoneal gastrostomy leakage after the procedure. A functioning gastrostomy tube was established and maintained for as long as was required in 34 (89.5%) of 38 patients referred during a 21-month period. This necessitated further gastrostomy tube placements in 13 patients. On average, inserted gastrostomy tubes functioned for 10.75 weeks and during the review period a total of 34 malfunctioning tubes required replacement or removal. This was most commonly due to tube dislodgement, blockage, or intraperitoneal leakage. We found increasing pneumoperitoneum on sequential postprocedure erect chest films a reliable sign in the diagnosis of the latter complication. In conclusion, while we have been disappointed with aspects of individual tube function, our satisfactory overall functional success rate indicates that percutaneous gastrostomy is an effective method for establishing and maintaining enteral feeding. We also propose a protocol for the management of suspected intraperitoneal leakage based on the findings on postprocedure erect chest films.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho CS. Percutaneous gastrostomy for jejunal feeding. Radiology 1983;149:595–596

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tao HH, Gillies RR. Percutaneous feeding gastrostomy. AJR 1983;141;793–794

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wills JS, Oglesby JT. Percutaneous gastrostomy. Radiology 1983;149:449–453

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ho CS, Gray RR, Goldfinger M, Rosen IE, McPherson R. Percutaneous gastrostomy for enteral feeding. Radiology 1985;156:349–351

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halkier BK, Ho CS, Yee ACN. Percutaneous feeding gastrostomy with the Seldinger technique: review of 252 patients. Radiology 1989;171:359–361

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saini S, Mueller PR, Gaa J, et al. Percutaneous gastrostomy with gastropexy: experience in 125 patients. AJR 1990;154:1003–1006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CS, Yeung EY. Percutaneous gastrostomy and transgastric jejunostomy. AJR 1992;158:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  8. O Keeffe F, Carrasco CH, Charnsangavej C, Richli R, Wallace S, Friedman RS. Percutaneous drainage and feeding gastrostomies in 100 patients. Radiology 1989;172:341–343

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moran BJ, Taylor MB, Johnson CD. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Br J Surg 1990;77:858–862

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kutcher W, Cohen LB, Leonhardt C, Earhlich L. Impaired gastric emptying following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Gastroenterology 1989;5:686

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray RR, St Louis EL, Grosman H. Modified catheter for percutaneous gastrojejunostomy. Radiology 1989;173:276–278

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chung RS, Schertzer M. Pathogenesis of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a lesson in surgical principles. Am Surg 1990;56:134–137

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gottfield EB, Plumser AB, Clair MR. Pneumoperitoneum following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1986;32:397–399

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wojtowycz MM, Arata JA, Micklos TJ, Miller FJ. CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous gastrostomy. AJR 1988;151:307–309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLoughlin, R.F., Gibney, R.G. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy: Tube function and malfunction. Abdom Imaging 19, 195–200 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203505

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203505

Key words

Navigation