Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation Dose to the Radiologist’s Hand During Continuous CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computed tomography fluoroscopy (CT fluoroscopy) enables real-time image control over the entire body with high geometric accuracy and, for the most part, without significant interfering artifacts, resulting in increased target accuracy, reduced intervention times, and improved biopsy specimens [14]. Depending on the procedure being used, higher radiation doses than in conventional CT-supported interventions might occur. Because the radiologist is present in the CT room during the intervention, he is exposed to additional radiation, which is an important aspect. Initial experience with CT fluoroscopically guided interventions is from the work of Katada et al. in 1994 [5] and only relatively few reports on radiation aspects in CT fluoroscopy are found in the literature [1, 2, 611]. To date, there are no reported injuries to patients and radiologists occurring with CT fluoroscopy. The time interval since the wide use of CT fluoroscopy is too short to have data on late effects to the operator using CT fluoroscopy on a daily basis. In addition, the spectrum of CT fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures will expand and more sophisticated procedures requiring longer fluoroscopy times will be performed. Thus, effective exposure reduction is very important. The purpose of our study was to assess the radiation dose to the operator’s hand by using data from phantom measurements. In addition, we investigated the effect of a lead drape on the phantom surface adjacent to the scanning plane, the use of thin radiation protective gloves, and the use of different needle holders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EK Paulson DH Sheafor DS Enterline et al. (2001) ArticleTitleCT-fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists Radiology 220 161–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmsVOquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl29161 Occurrence Handle11425990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SG Silverman K Tuncali DF Adams et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCT-fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure Radiology 212 673–681 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslKluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se36673 Occurrence Handle10478231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Irie T, Kajitani M, Yoshioka H, et al. (2000) CT fluoroscopy for lung needle biopsy: a new device or needle placement and a phantom study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:359–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J Mey Particlede B Op Beeck Particlede M Meysman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleReal-time CT fluoroscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applications Eur J Radiol 32 32–40 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00157-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Katada K, Anno H, Takeshita G, et al. (1994) Development of CT fluoroscopy using fast CT. Nippon Act Radiol 54:1172–1174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R Kato K Katada H Anno et al. (1996) ArticleTitleRadiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders Radiology 201 576–578 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FktlSltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888264 Occurrence Handle8888264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. K Katada R Kato A Anno et al. (1996) ArticleTitleGuidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience Radiology 200 851–856 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zkslylsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756943 Occurrence Handle8756943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Irie T, Kajitani M, Yuji I (2001) CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scatter radiation dose to the physician’s hand by use of a lead plate and improved I-I device. SCVIR 12:1417–1421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, et al. (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74:720–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. RD Nawfel PF Judy SG Silverman et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePersonnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures Radiology 216 180–184 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czksl2ksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl39180 Occurrence Handle10887246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, et al. (2000) Effect of the learning on procedure times and radiation exposure for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:1217–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C Kleinschmidt (2001) ArticleTitleEGS-Ray, ein Programm zur Visualisierung von Monte-Carlo-Rechnungen in der Strahlenphysik Z Med Phys 11 119–123 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvjt1Kqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0939-3889(15)70499-X Occurrence Handle11480369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. RL Morin TC Gerber CH McCollough (2003) ArticleTitleRadiation dose in computed tomography of the heart Circulation 107 917–922 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.CIR.0000048965.56529.C2 Occurrence Handle12591765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, et al. (1998) Real-time CT fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 9:735–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT-fluoroscopic guidance. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 173:637–644

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MG Mack R Straub K Eichler et al. (2001) ArticleTitleNadelhalter zur Reduktion der Strahlenbelastung für den Untersucher bei einer CT-gesteuerten Punktion Radiologe 41 927–929 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmvFymug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001170170065 Occurrence Handle11715585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beate M. Stoeckelhuber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoeckelhuber, B.M., Leibecke, T., Schulz, E. et al. Radiation Dose to the Radiologist’s Hand During Continuous CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28, 589–594 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0104-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0104-2

Keywords

Navigation