Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of Source Images is Necessary for the Evaluation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography for Renal Artery Stenosis

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver variability and accuracy in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis (RAS) with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with hypertension. The authors found that source images are more accurate than maximum intensity projection (MIP) for depicting renal artery stenosis. Two independent radiologists reviewed MRA and DSA from 38 patients with hypertension. Studies were postprocessed to display images in MIP and source images. DSA was the standard for comparison in each patient. For each main renal artery, percentage stenosis was estimated for any stenosis detected by the two radiologists. To calculate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, MRA studies and stenoses were categorized as normal, mild (1–39%), moderate (40–69%) or severe (≥70%), or occluded. DSA stenosis estimates of 70% or greater were considered hemodynamically significant. Analysis of variance demonstrated that MIP estimates of stenosis were greater than source image estimates for both readers. Differences in estimates for MIP versus DSA reached significance in one reader. The interobserver variance for MIP, source images and DSA was excellent (0.80< κ≤ 0.90). The specificity of source images was high (97%) but less for MIP (87%); average accuracy was 92% for MIP and 98% for source images. In this study, source images are significantly more accurate than MIP images in one reader with a similar trend was observed in the second reader. The interobserver variability was excellent. When renal artery stenosis is a consideration, high accuracy can only be obtained when source images are examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig 5.
Fig 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NM Kaplan (1994) Hypertension in the population at large In: Kaplan NM (ed) Clinical hypertension Williams and Wilkins Baltimore 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. BJ Hillmann (1989) ArticleTitleImaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension AJR Am J Roentgenol 153 5–14 Occurrence Handle2660537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MR Prince (1994) ArticleTitleGadolinium enhanced MR aortography Radiology 191 155–164 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC1c7ns1M%3D Occurrence Handle8134563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SO Schoenberg MR Prince MV Knopp JR Allenberg (1998) ArticleTitleRenal MR angiography Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 351–370 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ivVersg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9560490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. InstitutionalAuthorNameNorth American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) ArticleTitleBeneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis N Engl J Med 325 445–453 Occurrence Handle1852179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M Volk M Strotzer M Lenhart (2000) ArticleTitleTime-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 1583–1588 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgt1SqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10845486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. E Fommei S Ghione AJ Hilson (1993) ArticleTitleCaptopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: A European multicenter study Eur J Nucl Med 20 617–623 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00176558 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA1c%2Fks1A%3D Occurrence Handle8370384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. VP Pottumarthi J Goldfarb Ch Sundaram A Priatna W Li RR Edelman (2000) ArticleTitleCaptopril MR renography in a swine model: Toward a comprehensive evaluation of renal arterial stenosis Radiology 217 813–818 Occurrence Handle11110948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DA Leung U Hoffmann T Pfammatter (1999) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance angiography versus duplex sonography for diagnosing renovascular disease Hypertension 33 726–731 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7kvVajtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10024336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M Galanski M Prokop A Chavan (1993) ArticleTitleRenal artery stenoses: Helical CT angiography Radiology 189 185–192 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA1czgsFc%3D Occurrence Handle8372191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JP Beregi M Elkohen G Deklunder (1996) ArticleTitleHelical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 495–501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3c3gtlM%3D Occurrence Handle8686635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. SO Schoenberg M Essig M Bock (1999) ArticleTitleComprehensive MR evaluation of renovascular disease in five breath holds J Magn Reson Imaging 10 347–356 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<347::AID-JMRI17>3.3.CO;2-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvjsl2hsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10508296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. J Bakker FJ Beek JJ Beutler (1998) ArticleTitleRenal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: Accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography Radiology 207 497–504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvVelsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9577501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MR Prince SO Schoenberg JS Ward (1997) ArticleTitleHemodynamically significant artheriosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features Radiology 205 128–136 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH28%2FlvFY%3D Occurrence Handle9314974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. F De Cobelli A Vanzulli S Sironi (1997) ArticleTitleRenal artery stenosis: Evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography Radiology 205 689–695 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FlsFansg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9393522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. TF Hany DA Leung T Pfammatter JF Debatin (1998) ArticleTitleContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: Original investigation Invest Radiol 33 653–669 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004424-199809000-00021 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjvFWrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9766050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JJ Snidow MS Johnson VJ Harris (1996) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold Radiology 198 725–732 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MvgvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8628861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JC Steffens J Link J Grassner (1997) ArticleTitleConrast-enhanced, k-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta J Magn Reson Imaging 7 617–622 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1cjjsVE%3D Occurrence Handle9243378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. PT Johnson EJ Halpern BS Kuszyk (1999) ArticleTitleRenal artery stenosis: CT angiography-comparison of real time volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms Radiology 211 337–343 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksFWqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10228511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. PS Calhoun BS Kuszyk DG Heath JC Carley EK Fishman (1999) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: Theory and method RadioGraphics 19 745–764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mslansQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10336201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. V Baskaran FS Pereles AA Nemcek JC Carr FH Miller J Ly E Krupinski JP Finn (2002) ArticleTitleGadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: A pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms Acad Radiol 9 50–59 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80296-9 Occurrence Handle11918359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the technician staff of the department of magnetic resonance for preparing the postprocessing images. Thanks also to Mrs. Genie Lamont for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Austria

    M. Wehrschuetz, M. Aschauer, H. Portugaller, A. Stix, K. Hausegger & F. Ebner

  2. Department of Angiology, University Hospital Graz, Austria

    E. Wehrschuetz-Sigl

Authors
  1. M. Wehrschuetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Aschauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Portugaller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Stix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Wehrschuetz-Sigl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Hausegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. F. Ebner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Wehrschuetz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wehrschuetz, M., Aschauer, M., Portugaller, H. et al. Review of Source Images is Necessary for the Evaluation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography for Renal Artery Stenosis. CVIR 27, 441–446 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0047-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0047-z

Search

Navigation