Skip to main content
Log in

Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: a European multicentre study

  • Occasional Survey
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic work-up of renovascular hypertension is still controversial. The efficacy of renal scintigraphy with technetium-99m diethylene triamine penta-acetate (DTPA) before and after captopril (scintigraphic captopril test) was evaluated in a multicentre study. All 380 hypertensive patients in the study underwent renal arteriography; 125 had renal arterial stenosis ≥ 70%, and 54 had a technically successful intervention to correct the stenosis. The post-captopril study had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100% for predicting blood pressure response to intervention, if renal function was normal and a combination of quantitative parameters was applied (individual kidney uptake index < 40%, time to peak activity < 2 min or > 10 min). In the entire population renal artery stenosis ≥ 70% was detected with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 93% if renal function was normal. In patients with abnormal renal function the performance of the test was worse, owing to a lower specificity which could be increased by using only time parameters. The performance of the test was optimal when the post-captopril findings were examined; no improvement was achieved by evaluation of the changes induced by captopril from the baseline. The test can thus be simplified by performing only a post-captopril study for routine use: a negative test would exclude a curable form of renovascular hypertension in > 80% and a positive test would predict it in > 90% of the patients selected for suspicion of the disease. Usefulness of the scintigraphic test for monitoring the clinical results of intervention is suggested by correlating post-intervention outcome with pre- and post-intervention scintigraphic results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hillman BJ. Imaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Am JRadiol 1989; 153:5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan NM. Renal vascular hypertension. In: Clinical hypertension. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1990:303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pickering TG. Diagnosis and evaluation of renovascular hypertension. Indications for therapy. Circulation 1991; 83:1147–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maxwell MH, Waks AU. Evaluation of patients with renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1984; 6:589–592.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hall JE, Guyton AC, Jackson TE, Coleman T, Lohmeier T, Trippodo N. Control of glomerular filtration rate by renin-angiotensin system. Am J Physiol 1977; 233:F366-F372.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dondi M, Franchi R, Levorato M, Zuccala A, Gaggi R, Mirelli M, Stella A, Marchetta F, Losinno F, Monetti N. Evaluation of hypertensive patients by means of captopril enhanced renal scintigraphy with technetium-99m DTPA. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fommei E, Ghione S, Palla L, Mosca F, Ferrari M, Palombo C, Giaconi S, Gazzetti P, Donato L. Renal scintgraphy captopril test in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1987; 10:212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geyskes GG, Oei HY, Puylaert CBAJ, Dorhout Mees EJ. Renovascular hypertension identified by captopril-induced changes in the renogram. Hypertension 1987; 9:451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mann SJ, Pickering TG, Sos TA, Uzzo RG, Sarkar S, Friend K, Rackson ME, Laragh JH. Captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: accuracy and limitations. Am J Med 1991; 90:30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oci HY, Geyskes GG, Dorhout Mees EJ. The significance of captopril renography in renovascular hypertension. Contr Nephrol 1987; 56:95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Setaro JF, Saddler MC, Chen CC, Hoffer PB, Roer DA, Markowitz DM, Meier GH, Gusberg RJ, Black HR. Simplified captopril renography in diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis. Hypertension 1991; 18:289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sfakianakis GN, Bourgoignie JJ, Jaffe D. Single-dose captopril scintigraphy in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1987; 28:1383–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Svetkey L, Himmelstein SI, Dunnick NR, Wilkinson RH, Bollinger RR, McCann RL, Beytas EM, Klotman PE. Prospective analysis of strategies for diagnosing renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1989; 14:247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fommei E, Mezzasalma L, Ghione S. Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: a European multicenter study. In: Blaufox MD, Hollemberg NK, Raynaud C, eds. Radionuclides in nephro-urology. Basel: Karger; 1990:205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andersson I, Bergentz SE, Eriksson BF. Unilateral renal artery stenosis in hypertension. II. Acta Radiol Diagn 1979; 20:895–906.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pickering TG. Renovascular hypertension: medical evaluation and nonsurgical treatment. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven; 1990:1539–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maxwell MH, Bleifer KH, Franklin SS, Varady PD. Cooperative study of renovascular hypertension: demographic analysis of the study. JAMA 1972; 220:1195–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA. Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138:565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swets JA. ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Radiology 1979; 14:109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Majd M, Potter BM, Guzzetta PC, Ruley EJ. Effect of captopril on efficacy of renal scintigraphy in detection of renal artery stenosis [abstract]. J Nucl Med 1983; 24:P23.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oei HY, Geyskes GG, Dorhout Mees EJ, Pulyaert CBAJ. Captopril induced renographic alteration in unilateral renal artery stenosis [abstract]. J Nucl Med 1984; 25:P36.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fommei E, Mezzasalma L, Ghione S, Volterrani D, Oei HY, Hilson AJW, Carrieri M, and the European Captopril Radionuclide Test Multicentre Study Group. European captopril radionuclide test multicentre study. Preliminary results: inspective renographic analysis. Am J Hypertens 1991; 4:690S-697S.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eyler WR, Clark MD, Garman JE, Rian RL, Meninger DE. Angiography of the renal areas including a comparative study of renal artery stenoses in patients with and without hypertension. Radiology 1962; 78:879–892.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holley KE, Hunt JC, Brown AL, Kinkaid OW, Sheps SG. Renal artery stenosis: a clinical-pathological study in normotensive patients. Am J Med 1964; 37:14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blaufox MD, Freeman LM. Renewed role of nuclear medicine in renovascular hypertension. Urol Radiol 1988; 10:35–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: E. Fommei

The European Multicentre Study Group

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fommei, E., Ghione, S., Hilson, A.J.W. et al. Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: a European multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 20, 617–623 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176558

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176558

Key words

Navigation