Skip to main content
Log in

Anisotropic mean-squared-displacement tensor in cubic almandine garnet: a single crystal 57Fe Mössbauer study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Physics and Chemistry of Minerals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes single-crystal measurements on a crystal plate cut from a naturally-occurring almandine-rich single crystal (Alm69Pyr19Spe8Gro4) from Wrangell Alaska. The objective was to measure the mean-squared-displacement (msd) tensor precisely using Mössbauer spectroscopy. Parallel quantum-mechanical calculations based on X-ray determined atomic displacement parameters and Mössbauer parameters from polycrystalline measurements indicated that the msd tensor should display significant anisotropy, easily measurable within the precision of the Mössbauer experiment. For each single-crystal orientation the observed Mössbauer spectrum represents a macroscopic quantity that is the average over six symmetry-related (local) dodecahedral sites in which the high-spin Fe2+ ions reside. The anisotropy in the measured msd tensor is, nevertheless, unequivocal. Furthermore, the magnitudes of the Mössbauer-determined msd principal values exceed those of the corresponding X-ray-determined quantities by a factor 3.7. The equivalent recoilless fractions are also anisotropic and consequently one observes the Gol’danskii–Karyagin Effect (GKE), as manifested by an asymmetric quadrupole doublet in polycrystalline absorbers. Moreover, the line widths of the two quadrupole lines are markedly different but angle invariant. This is interpreted as implying that, in addition to anisotropy in the msd tensor, differential spin–spin relaxation is present in the \( m = \pm 3/2 \leftrightarrow \pm 1/2 \) and \( m = \pm 1/2 \leftrightarrow \pm 1/2,\, \mp 1/2 \) nuclear transitions. While both effects contribute to the quadrupole asymmetries observed in Mössbauer spectra of polycrystalline almandine, the GKE is apparently predominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amthauer G, Annersten H, Hafner SS (1976) The Mössbauer spectrum of 57Fe in silicate garnets. Z Kristallog 143:14–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster T, Geiger CA, Lager GA (1992) Single-crystal X-ray structure study of synthetic pyrope almandine garnets at 100 and 293 K. Am Miner 77:512–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume M (1965) Magnetic relaxation and asymmetric quadrupole doublets in the Mössbauer effect. Phys Rev Lett 14:96–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume M, Tjon JA (1968) Mössbauer spectra in a fluctuating environment. Phys Rev 165:446–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand RN (1994) Program NORMOS. Distributed by Wissenschaftliche Elektronik, GMBH, Germany

  • Bull JN, Robinson WT, Tennant WC (2009) Ferrous ammonium sulphate hexahydrate revisited: a combined 57Fe Mössbauer and X-ray single crystal study. Hyperfine Interact 194:347–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull JN, Fitchett CM, Tennant WC (2011) Microscopic 57Fe electric-field-gradient and anisotropic mean-squared-displacement tensors: ferrous chloride tetrahydrate. Hyperfine Interact 198:273–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bykov GA, Hein PZ (1963) Calculation of parameters of experimental spectra of resonance absorption of gamma quanta in crystals. Sov Phys JETP 16:646–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins RL, Travers JC (1967) The electric field gradient tensor. In: Gruverman IJ (ed) Mössbauer effect methodology. Plenum Press, New York, vol 3, pp 123–161

  • De Grave E, Van Alboom A (1991) Evaluation of ferrous and ferric Mössbauer fractions. Phys Chem Miner 18:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira JCP, Kunrath JI, Vasquez A (1987) The Mössbauer effect in natural almandine: Fe3Al2(SiO4)3. Phys Scr 36:526–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds AR (1974) Angular momentum in quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Geiger CA, Armbruster Th, Lager GA, Jiang K, Lottermoser W, Amthauer G (1992) A combined temperature dependent 57Fe Mössbauer and single crystal X-ray diffraction study of synthetic almandine: evidence for the Gol’danskii–Karyagin effect. Phys Chem Miner 19:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger CA, Grodzicki M, Amthauer G (2003) The crystal chemistry and FeII-site properties of aluminosilicate garnet solid solutions as revealed by Mössbauer spectroscopy and electronic structure calculations. Phys Chem Miner 30:280–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb TC (1978) The orientation of the electric-field-gradient tensor from single crystal Mössbauer measurements. J Chem Soc, Dalton Trans 7:743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding RM (1969) Applied wave mechanics. D Van Nostrand Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding RM, Tennant WC (2008) Quantum mechanics in chemical physics: an exploration. Common Ground Publishing, Altona

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RW, Housley RM, Gonser U (1969) Nuclear electric field gradient and mean square displacement of the iron sites in sodium nitroprusside. Phys Rev 178:523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gütlich P, Link R, Trautwein A (1978) Mössbauer spectroscopy and transition metal chemistry. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Housley RM, Grant RW, Gonser U (1969) Coherence and polarization effects in Mössbauer absorption by single crystals. Phys Rev 178:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubutin IS, Dodokin AP (1971) Temperature dependence of the Mössbauer Effect for Fe2+ in dodecahedral coordination in garnet. Sov Phys Crystallogr 18:1091–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon CA, Chinn IL, Gurney JJ, McCallum ME (1998) Ferric iron content of mineral inclusions in diamonds from George Creek, Colorado determined using Mössbauer spectroscopy. Contrib Miner Petrol 133:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCammon CA, Tennant WC, Miletich R (2000) A new method for single crystal measurements: application to Mössbauer spectra of mineral inclusions in diamond. Hyperfine Interact 126:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murad E, Wagner FE (1987) The Mössbauer spectrum of almandine. Phys Chem Miner 14:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak GA, Gibbs GV (1971) The crystal chemistry of the silicate garnets. Am Miner 56:791–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandl W (1971) Die magnetische Struktur und die Atomparameter des Almandins. Al2Fe3(SiO4)3. Z Kristallogr 134:333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prandl W, Wagner F (1971) Die Orientierung des elektrischen Feldgradienten und des innere Magnetfeld beim Almandin. Z Kristallogr 134:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae AD (1969) Relationships between the experimental Hamiltonian and point symmetry of a paramagnetic species in a crystal. J Chem Phys 50:2672–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant WC (1992) Analysis of single-crystal Mössbauer data in low-symmetry 57Fe centres. J Phys: Condens Matter 4:6993–7008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant WC, McGavin DG, Patterson KH (1992) Theory and FORTRAN programme for analysis of Mössbauer single crystal data. NZ Inst for Ind Res Dev, Report IRL No 8

  • Weil JA (1973) Use of symmetry-related crystal sites for measuring tensor properties in magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson 10:391–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil JA, Buch T, Clapp JE (1973) Crystal point group symmetry and microscopic tensor properties in magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Adv Magn Reson 6:183–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland AB, Droop G, O’Neill H, St C (1995) Almandine-rich garnet from near Collobrières, southern France, and its petrological significance. Eur J Mineral 7:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zherebetskyy D, Lebernegg S, Amthauer G, Grodzicki M (2012) Magnetic structure of almandine. Phys Chem Miner 39:351–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (1975) A method for evaluation of single crystal 57Fe Mössbauer spectra (FeCl2·4H2O). Nucl Instr Meth 128:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (1983) In: Thosar BV, Srivastava JK, Iyengar PK, Bhargava SC (eds) Advances in Mössbauer spectroscopy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–315

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the following: R Spiers (Geology Dept, University of Canterbury) for help with crystal preparation, W Robinson for the space group and cell edge determination, H Schultz and D Ojwang (both at Bayerisches Geoinstitut) for cutting/polishing of the crystal and electron microprobe analysis, respectively, and H Spiering (Mainz) for useful comments and discussions, particularly regarding the masking of the detector. JNB gratefully acknowledges financial support from a Tertiary Education Top Achiever Scholarship. WCT would especially like to thank the charming but unnamed young ladies of Wrangell, Alaska, from whom the crystal used in these studies was purchased at the port of Wrangell in 2008. We thank C A Geiger and an anonymous referee for their helpful reviews, and C A Geiger for bringing the Zherebetskyy et al. paper to our attention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. C. Tennant.

Appendix

Appendix

Thickness corrections

We outline briefly the equations and procedures for thickness corrections following Housley et al. (1969) and Zimmermann (1983) (see also Golding and Tennant (2008), vol II, p. 810). We define useful quantities in terms of a polarization operator, σ, its eigenvalues σ 1 and σ 2 and a “thickness”, p (effectively the cross section at resonance), where

$$ p = (\sigma_{1} + \sigma_{2} )/2 $$
(28)

In the most general case, thickness is polarization dependent and the degree of polarization, a, is defined as

$$ a = (\sigma_{1} - \sigma_{2} )/(\sigma_{1} + \sigma_{2} ), $$
(29)

hence

$$ \sigma_{1} = p(1 + a)\quad {\text{and}}\quad \sigma_{ 2} = p(1 - a) $$
(30)

In the almandine case, since polarization is zero, we have simply σ1 = σ2 = p.

Assuming that the gamma-ray source is a single line and unpolarized, the dimensionless absorption areas, S, can be expressed by the Bykov and Hein (1963) equation (Housley et al. 1969; Zimmermann 1983; Golding and Tennant 2008), namely

$$ S(p) = \frac{{\sigma_{1} }}{2}\exp \left( { - \frac{{\sigma_{1} }}{2}} \right)\left\{ {I_{0} \left( {\frac{{\sigma_{1} }}{2}} \right) + I_{1} \left( {\frac{{\sigma_{1} }}{2}} \right)} \right\} + \frac{{\sigma_{2} }}{2}\exp \left( { - \frac{{\sigma_{2} }}{2}} \right)\left\{ {I_{0} \left( {\frac{{\sigma_{2} }}{2}} \right) + I_{1} \left( {\frac{{\sigma_{2} }}{2}} \right)} \right\} $$
(31)

In Eq. 31, I 0 (x) and I 1 (x) are modified Bessel functions of the first kind (i.e., with imaginary argument) of order 0 and 1, respectively. An expansion of Eq. 31 utilising Eq. 30 for the zero polarization case and its more useful inversion as detailed by Bull et al. (2009) are as follows:

$$ S = p + \frac{1}{4}p^{2} + \frac{1}{16}p^{3} + \frac{5}{384}p^{4} + \frac{5}{3,072}p^{5} - \frac{7}{30,720}p^{6} - \frac{169}{737,280}p^{7} + \ldots $$
(32)
$$ p = S + \frac{1}{4}S^{2} + \frac{1}{16}S^{3} + \frac{5}{384}S^{4} + \frac{5}{3,072}S^{5} - \frac{7}{30,720}S^{6} - \frac{169}{737,280}S^{7} + \cdots $$
(33)

The inverse Eq. 33, is usually sufficient to obtain a convergent thickness correction. The correction can be checked easily by substitution in Eq. 32 for which a few extra terms, given in Bull et al. (2009), can be useful.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bull, J.N., Tennant, W.C., Ballaran, T.B. et al. Anisotropic mean-squared-displacement tensor in cubic almandine garnet: a single crystal 57Fe Mössbauer study. Phys Chem Minerals 39, 561–575 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-012-0512-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-012-0512-1

Keywords

Navigation