Thermoelasticity and high-T behaviour of anthophyllite

Abstract

The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite has been determined for a natural crystal with crystal-chemical formula ^ANa_0.01 ^B(Mg_1.30Mn_0.57Ca_0.09Na_0.04) ^C(Mg_4.95Fe_0.02Al_0.03) ^T(Si_8.00)O₂₂ ^W(OH)₂ using single-crystal X-ray diffraction to 973 K. The best model for fitting the thermal expansion data is that of Berman (J Petrol 29:445–522, 1988) in which the coefficient of volume thermal expansion varies linearly with T as α _V,T  = a ₁ + 2a ₂ (T − T ₀): α₂₉₈ = a ₁ = 3.40(6) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a ₂ = 5.1(1.0) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻². The corresponding axial thermal expansion coefficients for this linear model are: α _a ,₂₉₈ = 1.21(2) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a _2,a  = 5.2(4) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻²; α _b ,₂₉₈ = 9.2(1) × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹, a _2,b  = 7(2) × 10⁻¹⁰ K⁻². α _c ,₂₉₈ = 1.26(3) × 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹, a _2,c  = 1.3(6) × 10⁻⁹ K⁻². The thermoelastic behaviour of anthophyllite differs from that of most monoclinic (C2/m) amphiboles: (a) the ε ₁ − ε ₂ plane of the unit-strain ellipsoid, which is normal to b in anthophyllite but usually at a high angle to c in monoclinic amphiboles; (b) the strain components are ε ₁ ≫ ε ₂ > ε ₃ in anthophyllite, but ε ₁ ~ ε ₂ ≫ ε ₃ in monoclinic amphiboles. The strain behaviour of anthophyllite is similar to that of synthetic C2/m ^ANa ^B(LiMg) ^CMg₅ ^TSi₈ O₂₂ ^W(OH)₂, suggesting that high contents of small cations at the B-site may be primarily responsible for the much higher thermal expansion ⊥(100). Refined values for site-scattering at M4 decrease from 31.64 epfu at 298 K to 30.81 epfu at 973 K, which couples with similar increases of those of M1 and M2 sites. These changes in site scattering are interpreted in terms of Mn ↔ Mg exchange involving M1,2 ↔ M4, which was first detected at 673 K.