Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermal equations of state of dioctahedral micas on the join muscovite–paragonite

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Physics and Chemistry of Minerals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 Powder diffraction measurements at simultaneous high pressure and temperature on samples of 2M1 polytype of muscovite (Ms) and paragonite (Pg) were performed at the beamline ID30 of ESRF (Grenoble), using the Paris-Edinburgh cell. The bulk moduli of Ms, calculated from the least-squares fitting of VP data on each isotherm using a second-order Birch–Murnaghan EoS, were: 57.0(6), 55.1(7), 51.1(7) and 48.9(5) GPa on the isotherms at 298, 573, 723 and 873 K, respectively. The value of (∂K T /∂T) was −0.0146(2) GPa K−1. The thermal expansion coefficient α varied from 35.7(3) × 10−6 K−1 at P ambient to 20.1(3) × 10−6 K−1 at P = 4 GPa [(∂α/∂P) T = −3.9(1) × 10−6 GPa−1 K−1]. The corresponding values for Pg on the isotherms at 298, 723 and 823 K were: bulk moduli 59.9(5), 55.7(6) and 53.8(7) GPa, (∂K T /∂T) −0.0109(1) GPa K−1. The thermal expansion coefficient α varied from 44.1(2) × 10−6 K−1 at P ambient to 32.5(2) × 10−6 K−1 at P = 4 GPa [(∂α/∂P) T = −2.9(1) × 10−6 GPa−1 K−1]. Thermoelastic coefficients showed that Pg is stiffer than Ms; Ms softens more rapidly than Pg upon heating; thermal expansion is greater and its variation with pressure is smaller in Pg than in Ms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 28 January 2002 / Accepted: 5 April 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comodi, P., Gatta, G., Zanazzi, P. et al. Thermal equations of state of dioctahedral micas on the join muscovite–paragonite. Phys Chem Min 29, 538–544 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-002-0252-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-002-0252-8

Navigation