Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes Following Immediate Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (VRAM) Flap-Based Perineal Reconstruction Following Resectional Surgery For Pelvic Malignancies

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Increasingly radical surgery combined with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy present a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The study objective was to review outcomes of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (VRAM) flap-based perineal reconstruction following resectional surgery for pelvic malignancies.

Methods

Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing immediate VRAM flap reconstruction of a perineal/pelvic defect for pelvic malignancy between July 2009 and November 2017. Primary outcome was perineal morbidity (surgical site infection (SSI), flap loss or dehiscence and perineal hernia). Secondary outcomes were length of stay and donor site morbidity (SSI, full-thickness dehiscence and incisional hernia).

Results

A total of 178 patients (96 females) were included. Median age was 67 years (range 28–88). The majority were performed for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 122; 68.5%) and 136 (76.4%) patients had received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients had complete flap loss (2.3%), and 40 had perineal dehiscence (22.5%); however, only, 18 patients required a return to theatre during the admission for perineal-related complications (10.1%). Abdominal dehiscence occurred in six patients (3.4%). Median length of post-operative stay was 15 days (6–131). Sixty-day mortality rate was 1.1%. SSI at the midline and perineum occurred in 34 (19.1%) and 38 patients (21.3%), respectively. At 90-day post-operatively, 75.6% of perineal wounds were healed. During a median follow-up of 44.5 months, twelve, eleven and 39 patients were diagnosed with perineal, midline and parastomal hernias, respectively (6.9%, 6.2% and 21.9%).

Conclusions

It is important to have accurate knowledge of perineal and donor-site morbidity rates to allow an informed consent process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) STROBE initiative. strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGregor AD (2005) Functional reconstruction of the perineum and pelvic floor. In: Beynon J, Carr ND (eds) Progress in colorectal surgery. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahami T, Haque A, Harris D et al (2015) The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap—a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 17(5):455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler CE, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2005) Pelvic reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: Is It worthwhile? Ann Surg Onc 12(2):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shukla H, Hughes L (1984) The rectus abdominis flap for perineal wounds. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66:337–339

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaudhry A, Oliver JD, Vyas KS et al (2019) Comparison of outcomes in oncoplastic pelvic reconstruction with VRAM versus omental flaps: a large cohort analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 35(6):425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson RA, Butler CE (2009) Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(1):175–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Proctor MJ, Westwood DA, Donahoe S et al (2019) Morbidity associated with the immediate vertical rectus abdominus myocutameous flap reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CC, Lan YT, Jiang JK et al (2019) Risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing and its impact on prolonged hospital stay after abdominoperineal resection. World J Surg Oncol 17:226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horch RE, Hohenberger W, Eweida A et al (2014) A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(7):813–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reeves N, Torkington J, Welsh Barbers SSI Research Collaborative (2019) WICS: Wound infection in colorectal surgery- an all Wales prospective snapshot audit of colorectal surgical site infections. Colorectal Dis 21(S3):48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T et al (2015) Systematic Review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138745

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Steven Atherton for the illustration

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhiannon L. Harries.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Human and animal rights

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harries, R.L., Radwan, R.W., Dewi, M. et al. Outcomes Following Immediate Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (VRAM) Flap-Based Perineal Reconstruction Following Resectional Surgery For Pelvic Malignancies. World J Surg 45, 2290–2297 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06044-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06044-0

Navigation