Abstract
Background
In resource-limited countries, open appendectomy is still performed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA). We sought to compare the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy under NA versus GA.
Methods
We conducted a post hoc analysis of the International Patterns of Opioid Prescribing (iPOP) multicenter study. All patients ≥ 16 years-old who underwent an open appendectomy between October 2016 and March 2017 in one of the 14 participating hospitals were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: NA—defined as spinal or epidural—and GA. All-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), and pain severity were assessed using univariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression adjusting for the following preoperative characteristics: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, history of opioid use, emergency status, and country.
Results
A total of 655 patients were included, 353 of which were in the NA group and 302 in the GA group. The countries operating under NA were Colombia (39%), Thailand (31%), China (23%), and Brazil (7%). Overall, NA patients were younger (mean age (SD): 34.5 (14.4) vs. 40.7 (17.9), p-value < 0.001) and had a lower BMI (mean (SD): 23.5 (3.8) vs. 24.3 (5.2), p-value = 0.040) than GA patients. On multivariable analysis, NA was independently associated with less postoperative complications (OR, 95% CI: 0.30 [0.10–0.94]) and shorter hospital LOS (LOS > 3 days, OR, 95% CI: 0.47 [0.32–0.68]) compared to GA. There was no difference in postoperative pain severity between the two techniques.
Conclusions
Open appendectomy performed under NA is associated with improved outcomes compared to that performed under GA. Further randomized controlled studies should examine the safety and value of NA in lower abdominal surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wagner M, Tubre DJ, Asensio JA (2018) Evolution and current trends in the management of acute appendicitis. Surg Clin North Am 98:1005–1023
Lin K-B, Chan C-L, Yang N-P et al (2015) Epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy for the low-income population in Taiwan, 2003–2011. BMC Gastroenterol 15:18
Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y et al (2013) Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. Jbjs 95:193–199
Lal P, Philips P, Saxena KN et al (2007) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair under epidural anesthesia: a detailed evaluation. Surg Endosc 21:595–601
Tiwari S, Chauhan A, Chaterjee P et al (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: a prospective, randomised study. J Minim Access Surg 9:65
Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K et al (2008) Spinal vs general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Arch Surg 143:497–501
Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD et al (1991) Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126:997–1001
Favaro MdL, Gabor S, Souza DBF et al (2020) Quadratus lumborum block as a single anesthetic method for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (Tep) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep 10:8526
Jun G-W, Kim M-S, Yang H-J et al (2014) Laparoscopic appendectomy under spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine infusion. Korean J Anesthesiol 67:246
Mane RS, Patil MC, Kedareshvara K et al (2012) Combined spinal epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: a case series. Saudi J Anaesth 6:27
Uzman S, Donmez T, Erdem VM et al (2017) Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective feasibility study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:208–213
Afolayan JM, Olajumoke TO, Amadasun FE et al (2014) Intrathecal tramadol versus intrathecal fentanyl for visceral pain control during bupivacaine subarachnoid block for open appendicectomy. Niger J Clin Pract 17:324–330
Techanivate A, Pakom U, Predee K (2004) Adding of intrathecal fentanyl in hyperbaric bupivacaine improves analgesia during appendicectomy. Chula Med J 48:9–21
Dohlman LE (2017) Providing anesthesia in resource-limited settings. Current Opin Anesthesiol 30:496–500
Kaafarani HM, Han K, El Moheb M et al (2020) Opioids after surgery in the United States versus the rest of the world: the international patterns of opioid prescribing (iPOP) multicenter study. Ann Surg 272(6):879–886
Sgroi MD, McFarland G, Mell MW (2019) Utilization of regional versus general anesthesia and its impact on lower extremity bypass outcomes. J Vasc Surg 69:1874–1879
Finsterwald M, Muster M, Farshad M et al (2018) Spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in high risk patients: Perioperative hemodynamic stability, complications and costs. J Clin Anesth 46:3–7
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mobarak S et al (2020) Meta-analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 30:371–380
Saied NN, Helwani MA, Weavind LM et al (2017) Effect of anaesthesia type on postoperative mortality and morbidities: a matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Br J Anaesth 118:105–111
Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S et al (2000) Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 321:1493
Burton BN, Padwal JA, Swisher MW et al (2019) Postoperative outcomes with neuraxial versus general anesthesia in bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth 52:71–75
Pisansky AJB, Brovman EY, Kuo C et al (2018) Perioperative outcomes after regional versus general anesthesia for above the knee amputations. Ann Vasc Surg 48:53–66
Samaali I, Ben Osman S, Bedoui R et al (2012) Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: propensity score analysis. Tunis Med 90:686–691
Khan NA, Quan H, Bugar JM et al (2006) Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center. J Gen Intern Med 21:177–180
Saracoglu KT, Saracoglu A, Umuroglu T et al (2012) Neuraxial block versus general anaesthesia for cesarean section: post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements. J Pak Med Assoc 62:441–444
Sarakatsianou C, Georgopoulou S, Baloyiannis I et al (2017) Spinal versus general anesthesia for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Am J Surg 214:239–245
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52
Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 15:48
Ulutas M, Secer M, Taskapilioglu O et al (2015) General versus epidural anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy. J Clin Neurosci 22:1309–1313
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
The local institutional review board for each participating institution reviewed and approved this study. Individually negotiated Data User Agreements were signed between MGH and each participating site.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Moheb, M., Han, K., Breen, K. et al. General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Appendectomy: A Multicenter International Study. World J Surg 45, 3295–3301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05978-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05978-9