Abstract
The study investigated the ability of transdermal electric stimulation to prevent the formation of intra-abdominal adhesions in the combination with Seprafilm® (anti-adhesive agent). One hundred and twenty-eight (128) rabbits were subjected to a surgical procedure to simulate the adhesion processes. After the simulation, the animals were divided into 4 groups (32 animals each), depending on the application of the methods of prevention: (1) control group (no anti-adhesives or electro-stimulation) (CG); (2) comparison group (applications of Seprafilm®) (SF); (3) comparison group 2 (transdermal electric stimulation of the abdominal muscles) TES; (4) group (transdermal electric stimulation + Seprafilm®) (TES + SF). We observed that the application of the Seprafilm® alone led to a significant decrease in the adhesive process compared to the control group (CG) (p < 0.01). The adhesion process in the group underwent transdermal electrical stimulation (TES) was significantly lower compared to the Seprafilm® group (SF) (p ≤ 0.05). The results demonstrated a significant decrease in the adhesion processes in the SF + TES group on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 in comparison with the CG group (p = 0.001), SF group (p = 0.001) and TES group (p = 0.01) group of animals. This study showed the efficacy of transdermal electrical muscle stimulation for the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions. Moreover, the combination of Seprafilm® anti-adhesion agent and electrical muscle stimulation resulted in the complete absence of adhesions. Our findings indicate the potential of such strategy for further clinical application.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 May 2020
In the original version of this article, Ydyrys Almabayev’s, Timur Saliev’s, Aygul Almabayeva’s, Baimakhan Tanabayev’s, Maral Yergazina’s, and Zhandos Serikpayev’s first and last names were transposed.
References
Sebastian-Valverde E, Poves I, Membrilla-Fernandez E et al (2019) The role of the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. BMC Surg 19(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0504-x
Tabibian N, Swehli E, Boyd A et al (2017) Abdominal adhesions: a practical review of an often overlooked entity. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 15:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021
Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O (2011) Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol 17(41):4545–4553. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545
Behman R, Nathens AB, Byrne JP et al (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction is associated with a higher risk of bowel injury: a population-based analysis of 8584 patients. Ann Surg 266(3):489–498. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002369
Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA et al (2017) Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in prevention and management. J Gastrointest Surg 21(10):1713–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3488-9
Tsaousia G, Stavrou G, Fotiadis K et al (2019) Implementation of phospholipids as pharmacological modalities for postoperative adhesions prevention. Eur J Pharmacol 842:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.10.054
Li J, Feng X, Liu B (2017) Polymer materials for prevention of postoperative adhesion. Acta Biomater 61:21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.002
Buyukkale S, Çıtak N, İşgorucu O, Sayar A (2015) A bioabsorbable membrane (Seprafilm®) may prevent postoperative mediastinal adhesions following mediastinoscopy: an experimental study in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(7):11544–11548
Hong MK, Ding DC (2017) Seprafilm® application method in laparoscopic surgery. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00097
Cai H, Li H, He Y (2016) Interceed and estrogen reduce uterine adhesions and fibrosis and improve endometrial receptivity in a rabbit model of intrauterine adhesions. Reprod Sci 23(9):1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116632923
Diamond MP, Wexner SD, diZereg GS, Korell M, Zmora O, Van Goor H et al (2010) Adhesion prevention and reduction: current status and future recommendations of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Innov 17:183–188
Diamond MP (2016) Reduction of postoperative adhesion development. Fertil Steril 106(5):994–997.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.029
Wei G, Chen X, Wang G, Fan L, Wang K, Li X (2016) Effect of resveratrol on the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. Cell Physiol Biochem 39(1):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445603
Bianchi E, Boekelheide K, Sigman M, Lamb DJ, Hall SJ, Hwang K (2016) Ghrelin inhibits post-operative adhesions via blockage of the TGF-β signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153968
Thompson KL, Meier TR, Scholz JA (2017) Endotracheal intubation of rabbits using a polypropylene guide catheter. J Vis Exp 129:56369. https://doi.org/10.3791/56369
Benato L, Rooney NJ, Murrell JC (2019) Pain and analgesia in pet rabbits within the veterinary environment: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg 46(2):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.10.007
Almabayev YA, Fakhradiyev IR et al (2015) Method for the prevention of adhesive disease. Patent of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 31219, 2015/0395
Ersoy E, Ozturk V, Yazgan A (2009) Comparison of the two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions in rats. J Gastrointest Surg 13(2):282–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0678-5
Sandhya P, Zeeshan K (2019) Fast-track protocol versus conventional protocol on patient outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Niger J Surg 25(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_34_17
Awonuga AO, Belotte J, Abuanzeh S, Fletcher NM, Diamond MP, Saed GM (2014) Advances in the pathogenesis of adhesion development: the role of oxidative stress. Reprod Sci 21:823–836
Reed KL, Heydrick SJ, Aarons CB et al (2007) A neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist that reduces intra-abdominal adhesion formation decreases oxidative stress in the peritoneum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 3:G544–G551
Fintl C, Hudson NP, Handel I, Pearson GT (2016) The effect of temperature changes on in vitro slow wave activity in the equine ileum. Equine Vet J 48(2):218–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12401
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: In the original version of this article, Ydyrys Almabayev’s, Timur Saliev’s, Aygul Almabayeva’s, Baimakhan Tanabayev’s, Maral Yergazina’s, and Zhandos Serikpayev’s first and last names were transposed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fakhradiyev, I.R., Almabayev, Y., Saliev, T. et al. Prevention of Intra-abdominal Adhesions by Electrical Stimulation. World J Surg 44, 3351–3361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05508-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05508-z