Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevention of Intra-abdominal Adhesions by Electrical Stimulation

  • Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 18 May 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The study investigated the ability of transdermal electric stimulation to prevent the formation of intra-abdominal adhesions in the combination with Seprafilm® (anti-adhesive agent). One hundred and twenty-eight (128) rabbits were subjected to a surgical procedure to simulate the adhesion processes. After the simulation, the animals were divided into 4 groups (32 animals each), depending on the application of the methods of prevention: (1) control group (no anti-adhesives or electro-stimulation) (CG); (2) comparison group (applications of Seprafilm®) (SF); (3) comparison group 2 (transdermal electric stimulation of the abdominal muscles) TES; (4) group (transdermal electric stimulation + Seprafilm®) (TES + SF). We observed that the application of the Seprafilm® alone led to a significant decrease in the adhesive process compared to the control group (CG) (p < 0.01). The adhesion process in the group underwent transdermal electrical stimulation (TES) was significantly lower compared to the Seprafilm® group (SF) (p ≤ 0.05). The results demonstrated a significant decrease in the adhesion processes in the SF + TES group on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 in comparison with the CG group (p = 0.001), SF group (p = 0.001) and TES group (p = 0.01) group of animals. This study showed the efficacy of transdermal electrical muscle stimulation for the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions. Moreover, the combination of Seprafilm® anti-adhesion agent and electrical muscle stimulation resulted in the complete absence of adhesions. Our findings indicate the potential of such strategy for further clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 18 May 2020

    In the original version of this article, Ydyrys Almabayev’s, Timur Saliev’s, Aygul Almabayeva’s, Baimakhan Tanabayev’s, Maral Yergazina’s, and Zhandos Serikpayev’s first and last names were transposed.

References

  1. Sebastian-Valverde E, Poves I, Membrilla-Fernandez E et al (2019) The role of the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. BMC Surg 19(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0504-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabibian N, Swehli E, Boyd A et al (2017) Abdominal adhesions: a practical review of an often overlooked entity. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 15:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O (2011) Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol 17(41):4545–4553. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Behman R, Nathens AB, Byrne JP et al (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction is associated with a higher risk of bowel injury: a population-based analysis of 8584 patients. Ann Surg 266(3):489–498. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA et al (2017) Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in prevention and management. J Gastrointest Surg 21(10):1713–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3488-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsaousia G, Stavrou G, Fotiadis K et al (2019) Implementation of phospholipids as pharmacological modalities for postoperative adhesions prevention. Eur J Pharmacol 842:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.10.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Feng X, Liu B (2017) Polymer materials for prevention of postoperative adhesion. Acta Biomater 61:21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buyukkale S, Çıtak N, İşgorucu O, Sayar A (2015) A bioabsorbable membrane (Seprafilm®) may prevent postoperative mediastinal adhesions following mediastinoscopy: an experimental study in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(7):11544–11548

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong MK, Ding DC (2017) Seprafilm® application method in laparoscopic surgery. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai H, Li H, He Y (2016) Interceed and estrogen reduce uterine adhesions and fibrosis and improve endometrial receptivity in a rabbit model of intrauterine adhesions. Reprod Sci 23(9):1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116632923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond MP, Wexner SD, diZereg GS, Korell M, Zmora O, Van Goor H et al (2010) Adhesion prevention and reduction: current status and future recommendations of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Innov 17:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diamond MP (2016) Reduction of postoperative adhesion development. Fertil Steril 106(5):994–997.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei G, Chen X, Wang G, Fan L, Wang K, Li X (2016) Effect of resveratrol on the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. Cell Physiol Biochem 39(1):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bianchi E, Boekelheide K, Sigman M, Lamb DJ, Hall SJ, Hwang K (2016) Ghrelin inhibits post-operative adhesions via blockage of the TGF-β signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0153968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson KL, Meier TR, Scholz JA (2017) Endotracheal intubation of rabbits using a polypropylene guide catheter. J Vis Exp 129:56369. https://doi.org/10.3791/56369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benato L, Rooney NJ, Murrell JC (2019) Pain and analgesia in pet rabbits within the veterinary environment: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg 46(2):151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Almabayev YA, Fakhradiyev IR et al (2015) Method for the prevention of adhesive disease. Patent of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 31219, 2015/0395

  18. Ersoy E, Ozturk V, Yazgan A (2009) Comparison of the two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions in rats. J Gastrointest Surg 13(2):282–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0678-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandhya P, Zeeshan K (2019) Fast-track protocol versus conventional protocol on patient outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Niger J Surg 25(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_34_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Awonuga AO, Belotte J, Abuanzeh S, Fletcher NM, Diamond MP, Saed GM (2014) Advances in the pathogenesis of adhesion development: the role of oxidative stress. Reprod Sci 21:823–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reed KL, Heydrick SJ, Aarons CB et al (2007) A neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist that reduces intra-abdominal adhesion formation decreases oxidative stress in the peritoneum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 3:G544–G551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fintl C, Hudson NP, Handel I, Pearson GT (2016) The effect of temperature changes on in vitro slow wave activity in the equine ileum. Equine Vet J 48(2):218–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ildar R. Fakhradiyev.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: In the original version of this article, Ydyrys Almabayev’s, Timur Saliev’s, Aygul Almabayeva’s, Baimakhan Tanabayev’s, Maral Yergazina’s, and Zhandos Serikpayev’s first and last names were transposed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fakhradiyev, I.R., Almabayev, Y., Saliev, T. et al. Prevention of Intra-abdominal Adhesions by Electrical Stimulation. World J Surg 44, 3351–3361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05508-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05508-z

Navigation