Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of a Surgical Simulation Care Pathway Approach to Training in Emergency Abdominal Surgery

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Simulation-based care pathway approach (CPA) training is a novel approach in surgical education. The objective of the present study was to determine whether CPA was feasible for training surgical residents and could improve efficiency in patients’ management. A common disease was chosen: acute appendicitis.

Methods

All five junior residents of our department were trained in CPA: preoperative CPA consisted in virtual patients (VPs) presenting with acute right iliac fossa pain; intraoperative CPA involved a virtual competency-based curriculum for laparoscopic appendectomy (LAPP); finally, post-operative VP were reviewed after LAPP. Thirty-eight patients undergoing appendectomy were prospectively included before (n = 21) and after (n = 17) the training. All demographic and perioperative data were prospectively collected from their medical records, and time taken from admission to management was measured.

Results

All residents had performed less than 10 LAPP as primary operator. Pre- and intraoperative data were comparable between pretraining and post-training patients. Times to liquid and solid diet were significantly reduced after training [7 h (2–20) vs. 4 (4–6); P = 0.004, and 17 h (4–48) vs. 6 (4–24); P = 0.005] without changing post-operative morbidity [4 (19%) vs. 0 (0); P = 0.11] and length of stay [48 h (30–264) vs. 44 (21–145); P = 0.22].

Conclusions

CPA training is feasible in abdominal surgery. In the current study, it improved patients’ management in terms of earlier oral intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP (2010) Simulation in surgical education. CMAJ 182:1191–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV et al (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191:272–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer L, Troyer JD, Mancini J et al (2011) Impact of laparoscopy simulator training on the technical skills of future surgeons in the operating room: a prospective study. Am J Surg 202:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2014) Surgical ward round quality and impact on variable patient outcomes. Ann Surg 259:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikendei C, Kraus B, Schrauth M et al (2008) Ward rounds: how prepared are future doctors? Med Teach 30:88–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith SD, Henn P, Gaffney R et al (2012) A study of innovative patient safety education. Clin Teach 9:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel V, Aggarwal R, Taylor D, Darzi A (2011) Implementation of virtual online patient simulation. Stud Heal Technol Inf 163:440–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel V, Lee H, Taylor D (2012) Virtual worlds are an innovative tool for medical device training in a simulated environment. Stud Heal Technol Inf 173:338–343

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer-Berjot L, Patel V, Acharya A et al (2014) Surgical training: Design of a virtual care pathway approach. Surgery 156:689–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krajewski S, Brown J, Phang PT et al (2011) Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg 54:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vettoretto N, Gobbi S, Corradi A et al (2011) Consensus conference on laparoscopic appendectomy: development of guidelines. Colorectal Dis 13:748–754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coakley BA, Sussman ES, Wolfson TS et al (2011) Postoperative antibiotics correlate with worse outcomes after appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 213:778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Rossem CC, Schreinemacher MHF, Treskes K et al (2014) Duration of antibiotic treatment after appendicectomy for acute complicated appendicitis. Br J Surg 101:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Back D, Haberstroh N, Antolic A et al (2014) Blended learning approach improves teaching in a problem-based learning environment in orthopedics - a pilot study. BMC Med Educ 14:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V (2012) The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach 34:e216–e221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Forrest D et al (2006) Surgical crisis management skills training and assessment: a simulation [corrected]-based approach to enhancing operating room performance. Ann Surg 244:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Undre S, Koutantji M, Sevdalis N et al (2007) Multidisciplinary crisis simulations: the way forward for training surgical teams. World J Surg 31:1843–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9128-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen DC, Sevdalis N, Patel V et al (2012) Major incident preparation for acute hospitals: current state-of-the-art, training needs analysis, and the role of novel virtual worlds simulation technologies. J Emerg Med 43:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen D, Sevdalis N, Taylor D et al (2013) Emergency preparedness in the 21st century: training and preparation modules in virtual environments. Resuscitation 84:78–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giger U, Fresard I, Hafliger A et al (2008) Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 22:901–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ross HM, Simmang CL, Fleshman JW, Marcello PW (2008) Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation. Surg Innov 15:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Asano TK, Soto C, Poulin EC et al (2011) Assessing the impact of a 2-day laparoscopic intestinal workshop. Can J Surg 54:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel V, Aggarwal R, Osinibi E et al (2012) Operating room introduction for the novice. Am J Surg 203:266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Singh P et al (2014) Ward simulation to improve surgical ward round performance: a randomized controlled trial of a simulation-based curriculum. Ann Surg 260:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Srisatkunam T, Darzi A (2014) Validation of the simulated ward environment for assessment of ward-based surgical care. Ann Surg 259:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hansen MM, Murray PJ, Erdley WS (2009) The potential of 3-D virtual worlds in professional nursing education. Stud Heal Technol Inf 146:582–586

    Google Scholar 

  35. LeRoy Heinrichs W, Youngblood P et al (2008) Simulation for team training and assessment: case studies of online training with virtual worlds. World J Surg 32:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9354-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Youngblood P, Hedman L, Creutzfeld J et al (2007) Virtual worlds for teaching the new CPR to high school students. Stud Heal Technol Inf 125:515–519

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boulos MN, Hetherington L, Wheeler S (2007) Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Heal Info Libr J 24:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR et al (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A et al (2009) Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 96:1086–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Drake FT, Florence MG, Johnson MG et al (2012) Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State’s Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 256:586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Sierra R et al (2005) Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 138:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Beyer-Berjot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Rajesh Aggarwal is funded by a Clinical Scientist Award from the National Institute of Health Research, U.K. (Award Grant Number NIHR/CS/009/001), and a consultant for Applied Medical. This study was approved by the NRES Committee, London.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyer-Berjot, L., Patel, V., Sirimanna, P. et al. Implementation of a Surgical Simulation Care Pathway Approach to Training in Emergency Abdominal Surgery. World J Surg 44, 696–703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05242-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05242-1

Navigation