Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colon Perfusion Patterns During Colorectal Resection Using Visible Light Spectroscopy

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The impact of blood supply to the anastomosis on development of anastomotic leakage is still a matter of debate. Considering that bowel perfusion may be affected by manipulation during surgery, perfusion assessment of the anastomosis alone may be of limited value. We propose perfusion assessment at different time points during surgery to explore the dynamics of bowel perfusion during colorectal resection and its impact on outcome.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing elective colorectal resection were eligible. Colon perfusion was evaluated using visible light spectroscopy. Main outcome was the difference in colon perfusion, quantified by measuring tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) in the colonic serosa, before and after anastomosis during surgery.

Results

We included 58 patients between July 2013 and November 2015. Colon perfusion increased by an average of 5.9% StO2 during surgery (95% confidence interval 3.1, 8.8; P < 0.001). The number of patients with abnormal perfusion (defined as StO2 < 65%) decreased from 50% at the beginning to 24% by the end of surgery. Six patients (10%) developed anastomotic leaks (AL), of which five patients had abnormal perfusion at the beginning of surgery, whereas four patients had normal StO2 at the anastomosis.

Conclusion

Colon perfusion significantly increased during colorectal surgery. Considering that one quarter of patients had suboptimal anastomotic perfusion without developing AL, impaired blood flow at the anastomosis alone does not seem to be critical. Further investigations including more patients are necessary to evaluate the impact of perioperative parameters on colon perfusion, anastomotic healing and surgical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M et al (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Color Dis 8:366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Marijnen CAM et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR et al (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi H-K, Law W-L, Ho JWC (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145:371–6; discussion 376

  8. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JLR et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J et al (2014) Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:662–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suding P, Jensen E, Abramson MA et al (2008) Definitive risk factors for anastomotic leaks in elective open colorectal resection. Arch Surg 143:907–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stokes KY, Granger DN (2005) Hypercholesterolemia: its impact on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 3:1061–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akça O (2011) Managing intraoperative blood pressure with norepinephrine: effects on perfusion and oxygenation of the intestinal tract. Anesthesiology 114:488–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shogan BD, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC, Umanskiy K (2013) Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg 17:1698–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradbury AW, Brittenden J, McBride K, Ruckley CV (1995) Mesenteric ischaemia: a multidisciplinary approach. Br J Surg 82:1446–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaleya R, Boley S (1995) Acute mesenteric ischemia. Crit Care Clin 11:479–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M et al (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43:76–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seike K, Koda K, Saito N et al (2007) Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery. Int J Color Dis 22:689–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster ME, Brennan SS, Morgan A, Leaper DJ (1985) Colonic ischaemia and anastomotic healing. Eur Surg Res 17:133–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Color Dis 24:569–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG (1996) Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg 183:357–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Komen N, Slieker J, de Kort P et al (2011) High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. Int J Color Dis 26:1075–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karliczek A, Benaron D, Zeebregts C et al (2009) Intraoperative ischemia of the distal end of colon anastomoses as detected with visible light spectroscopy causes reduction of anastomotic strength. J Surg Res 152:288–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karliczek A, Benaron D, Baas P et al (2008) Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy in esophageal and colorectal anastomoses. Eur Surg Res 41:303–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karliczek A, Benaron DA, Baas PC et al (2010) Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses. Color Dis 12:1018–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P et al (2004) The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg 14:1290–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerin J-P, Levraut J, Samat-Long C et al (2005) Effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics, oxygen exchange, and energy balance in vasoplegic septic patients. Shock 23:18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ et al (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6:14–26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ris F, Hompes R, Cunningham C et al (2014) Near-infrared (NIR) perfusion angiography in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28:2221–2226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll 220(82–92):e1

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gröne J, Koch D, Kreis ME (2015) Impact of intraoperative microperfusion assessment with Pinpoint Perfusion Imaging on surgical management of laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses. Color Dis 17:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Benaron DA, Parachikov IH, Ph D et al (2004) Tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy. Anesthesiology 25:1469–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Friedland S, Soetikno R, Benaron D (2004) Reflectance spectrophotometry for the assessment of mucosal perfusion in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 14:539–53, ix–x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Friedland S, Benaron D, Parachikov I, Soetikno R (2003) Measurement of mucosal capillary hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the colon by reflectance spectrophotometry. Gastrointest Endosc 57:492–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. http://www.spectros.com/index.php?id=55

  36. Benaron DA, Parachikov IH, Friedland S et al (2004) Continuous, noninvasive, and localized microvascular tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy. Anesthesiology 100:1469–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Denne JS, Jennison C (1999) Estimating the sample size for a t-test using an internal pilot. Stat Med 18:1575–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sarkar D (2008) Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ (2010) Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbeck Arch Surg 395:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hiltebrand LB, Koepfli E, Kimberger O et al (2011) Hypotension during fluid-restricted abdominal surgery: effects of norepinephrine treatment on regional and microcirculatory blood flow in the intestinal tract. Anesthesiology 114:557–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nygren A, Thorén A, Ricksten S-E (2006) Vasopressors and intestinal mucosal perfusion after cardiac surgery: norepinephrine vs. phenylephrine. Crit Care Med 34:722–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gourevich D, Allen PIM, Goldman M (1987) N on-i nvasive endoscopic technique to assess gastrointestinal perfusion. Br J Surg 74:1053–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Theodorou D, Drimousis PG, Larentzakis A et al (2008) The effects of vasopressors on perfusion of gastric graft after esophagectomy. An experimental study. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1497–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nygren A, Thorén A, Ricksten S-E (2009) Vasopressin decreases intestinal mucosal perfusion: a clinical study on cardiac surgery patients in vasodilatory shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:581–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Voluntary Academic Society (FAG) Basel (Switzerland) and the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, Basel (Switzerland). The Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics is supported by grants from Santésuisse and from the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Hoffmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors state that there are no conflicts of interest regard the manuscript. Rachel Rosenthal has been an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd since May 1, 2014. The present study has no connection to her employment by the company. Rachel Rosenthal continues to be affiliated with the University of Basel. Juliane Schäfer has been an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd since December 1, 2016. The present study has no connection to her employment by the company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffmann, H., Delko, T., Kirchhoff, P. et al. Colon Perfusion Patterns During Colorectal Resection Using Visible Light Spectroscopy. World J Surg 41, 2923–2932 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4100-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4100-x

Navigation