Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ALPPS Procedure in Insufficient Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The main limiting factor for major liver resections is the volume and function of the future remnant liver (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) is now standard in most centers for preoperative hypertrophy of FLR. However, it has a failure rate of about 20–30 %. In these cases, the “Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy” (ALPPS) may represent a suitable and possibly the only alternative.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of nine patients who had ALPPS following an insufficient hypertrophy after PVE. Computed tomography volumetry were performed before and after PVE as well as the first step of ALPPS. Furthermore, complications, 30-day mortality and outcome were analyzed.

Results

The FLR volume rose significantly by 77.7 ± 40.7 % (FLR/TLV: 34.9 ± 9.7 %) as early as 9 days after the first stage despite insufficient hypertrophy after preoperative portal vein embolization. Major complications (Grade > IIIb) occurred in 33 % of the patients, and 30-day mortality was 11.1 %. The OS at 1 and 2 years was 78 and 44 %. Four patients are presently still alive at a median of 33.4 (range 15–48) months (survival rate 44.4 %).

Conclusion

The ALPPS procedure could be a suitable alternative for patients following insufficient PVE or indeed the last chance of a potentially curative treatment in this situation. Nevertheless, the high morbidity and mortality rates and the lack of data on the long-term oncological outcome must also be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal S, Belghiti J (2011) Oncologic resection for malignant tumors of the liver. Ann Surg 253:656–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356:1545–1559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam VW, Spiro C, Laurence JM, Johnston E, Hollands MJ, Pleass HC, Richardson AJ (2012) A systematic review of clinical response and survival outcomes of downsizing systemic chemotherapy and rescue liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1292–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunvén P et al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azoulay D, Castaing D, Krissat J, Smail A, Hargreaves GM, Lemoine A et al (2000) Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg 232:665–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Greget M, Weber JC, Bachellier P (2004) A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 240:1037–1049 (discussion 1049–51)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, de Graaf W, Bipat S, Lameris JS, van Gulik TM, van Delden OM (2013) Portal vein embolization before liver resection: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wicherts DA, Miller R, de Haas RJ, Bitsakou G, Vibert E, Veilhan LA et al (2008) Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg 248:994–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart J, Farkas SA et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Santibañes E, Clavien PA (2012) Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg 255:415–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan AZ, Morris-Stiff G, Makuuchi M (2009) Patterns of chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury and their implications for patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:137–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann K, Rickenbacher A, Weber A, Pestalozzi BC, Clavien PA (2012) Chemotherapy before liver resection of colorectal metastases: friend or foe? Ann Surg 255:237–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Vorst JR, van Dam RM, van Stiphout RS, van den Broek MA, Hollander IH, Kessels AG, Dejong CH (2010) Virtual liver resection and volumetric analysis of the future liver remnant using open source image processing software. World J Surg 34:2426–2433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang SA, Loss M, Schlitt HJ (2013) “In-situ Split” (ISS) liver resection: new aspects of technique and indication. Zentralbl Chir 139:212–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, Durand F (2005) The, “50–50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–828 (discussion 828–9)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinoshita H, Sakai K, Hirohashi K, Igawa S, Yamasaki O, Kubo S (1986) Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 10:803–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, van den Esschert JW, Bennink RJ, van Gulik TM (2011) Increase in future remnant liver function after preoperative portal vein embolization. Br J Surg 98:825–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ, Damrah O, Tait P, Jackson J et al (2008) Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kishi Y, Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, Palavecino M, Ribero D, Chun YS, Vauthey JN (2008) Is embolization of segment 4 portal veins before extended right hepatectomy justified? Surgery 144:744–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagino M, Kanai M, Morioka A, Yamamoto H, Kawabata Y, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y (2000) Portal and arterial embolization before extensive liver resection in patients with markedly poor functional reserve. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1063–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M, Ohta H, Azekura K, Ueno M et al (2001) Proliferative activity of intrahepatic colorectal metastases after preoperative hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Hepatology 34:267–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shindoh J, Vauthey J-N, Zimmitti G, Curley SA, Huang SY, Mahvash A et al (2013) Analysis of the efficacy of portal vein embolization for patients with extensive liver malignancy and very low future liver remnant volume, including a comparison with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach. J Am Coll Surg 217:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Graaf W, van den Esschert JW, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM (2009) Induction of tumor growth after preoperative portal vein embolization: is it a real problem? Ann Surg Oncol 16:423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Elias D, De Baere T, Roche A, Ducreux M, Leclere J, Lasser P (1999) During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Br J Surg 86:784–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heinrich S, Jochum W, Graf R, Clavien PA (2006) Portal vein ligation and partial hepatectomy differentially influence growth of intrahepatic metastasis and liver regeneration in mice. J Hepatol 45:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Andreani P, Sotirov D, Salloum C, Castaing D et al (2010) Impact of portal vein embolization on long-term survival of patients with primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:240–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E (2013) The ALPPS approach for the management of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases current colorectal cancer reports 9:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K, Tschuor C, Sergeant G, Amacker N et al (2014) ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg 38:1510–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Santibañes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V (2012) How to avoid postoperative liver failure: a novel method. World J Surg 36:125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Knoefel WT, Gabor I, Rehders A, Alexander A, Krausch M, Schulte am Esch J et al (2013) In situ liver transection with portal vein ligation for rapid growth of the future liver remnant in two-stage liver resection. Br J Surg 100:388–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nadalin S, Capobianco I, Li J, Girotti P, Königsrainer I, Königsrainer A (2014) Indications and limits for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Lessons learned from 15 cases at a single centre. Z Gastroenterol 52:35–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bertens KA, Pineda-Solis K, Croome KP (2015) Can we improve the morbidity and mortality associated with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure in the management of colorectal liver metastases? Surgery 157:194–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Truant S, Scatton O, Dokmak S, Regimbeau JM, Lucidi V, Laurent A et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): impact of the inter-stages course on morbi-mortality and implications for management. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:674–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlegel A, Lesurtel M, Melloul E, Limani P, Tschuor C, Graf R et al (2014) ALPPS: from human to mice highlighting accelerated and novel mechanisms of liver regeneration. Ann Surg 260:839–846 (discussion 846–7)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dokmak S, Belghiti J (2012) Which limits to the “ALPPS” approach? Ann Surg 256:e6 (author reply e16–e6; author reply e17)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kokudo N, Shindoh J (2013) How can we safely climb the ALPPS? Updates Surg 65:175–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R, Malago M, Machado M, Hernandez-Alejandro R et al (2014) Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the international ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 260:829–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brouquet A, Abdalla EK, Kopetz S, Garrett CR, Overman MJ, Eng C et al (2011) High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol 29:1083–1090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M, Pekolj J, de Santibañes E (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg 261:723–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Petrowsky H, Györi G, de Oliveira M, Lesurtel M, Clavien PA (2015) Is partial-ALPPS safer than ALPPS? A single-center experience. Ann Surg 261:e90–e92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oldhafer KJ, Donati M, Jenner RM, Stang A, Stavrou GA (2013) ALPPS for patients with colorectal liver metastases: effective liver hypertrophy, but early tumor recurrence. World J Surg 38:1504–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schadde E, Schnitzbauer AA, Tschuor C, Raptis DA, Bechstein WO, Clavien PA (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel procedure: associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3109–3120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lam VW, Laurence JM, Johnston E, Hollands MJ, Pleass HC, Richardson AJ (2013) A systematic review of two-stage hepatectomy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford) 15:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. F. Ulmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ulmer, T.F., de Jong, C., Andert, A. et al. ALPPS Procedure in Insufficient Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Embolization (PVE). World J Surg 41, 250–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3662-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3662-3

Keywords

Navigation