Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Cost of Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Femoral shaft fractures are one of the most common injuries seen by surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Surgical repair in LMICs is often dismissed as not being cost-effective or unsafe, though little evidence exists to support this notion. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the cost of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in Tanzania.

Methods

We used micro-costing methods to estimate the fixed and variable costs of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Variable costs assessed included medical personnel costs, ward personnel costs, implants, medications, and single-use supplies. Fixed costs included costs for surgical instruments and administrative and ancillary staff.

Results

46 adult femoral shaft fracture patients admitted to Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute between June and September 2014 were enrolled and treated with intramedullary fixation. The total cost per patient was $530.87 (SD $129.99). The mean variable cost per patient was $419.87 (SD $129.99), the largest portion coming from ward personnel $144.47 (SD $123.30), followed by implant $134.10 (SD $15.00) medical personnel $106.86 (SD $28.18), and medications/supplies $30.05 (SD $12.28). The mean fixed cost per patient was $111.00, consisting of support staff, $103.50, and surgical instruments, $7.50.

Conclusions

Our study provides empirical information on the variable and fixed costs of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in LMICs. Importantly, the lack of surgical capacity was the primary driver of the largest cost for this procedure, preoperative ward personnel time. Our results provide the cost data for a formal cost-effectiveness analysis on this intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD et al (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2224–2260. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimes CE, Bowman KG, Dodgion CM et al (2011) Systematic review of barriers to surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries. World J Surg 35(5):941–950. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1010-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farmer PE, Kim JY (2008) Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR. World J Surg 32(4):533–536. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9525-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chao TE, Sharma K, Mandigo M et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of surgery and its policy implications for global health: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2(6):e334–e345. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70213-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen AT, Pedtke A, Kobs JK et al (2012) Volunteer orthopedic surgical trips in Nicaragua: a cost-effectiveness evaluation. World J Surg 36(12):2802–2808. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1702-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosselin RA, Gialamas G, Atkin DM (2011) Comparing the cost-effectiveness of short orthopedic missions in elective and relief situations in developing countries. World J Surg 35(5):951–955. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0947-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Grimes CE, Henry JA, Maraka J et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. World J Surg 38(1):252–263. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2243-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips J, Jergesen HE, Caldwell A et al (2009) IGOT-The Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology: a model for collaboration and change. Tech Orthop 24(4):308–311. doi:10.1097/BTO.0b013e3181c3ebb1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (2009) Global status report on road safety: time for action. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bach O (2004) Musculoskeletal trauma in an East African public hospital. Injury 4:401–406. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00290-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal-Harding KJ, Meara JG, Greenberg SL et al (2015) Estimating the global incidence of femoral fracture from road traffic collisions: a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 6:e31. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma JT (2008) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Bong MR, Koval KJ, Egol KA (2006) The history of intramedullary nailing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 3–4:94–97

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vecsei V, Hajdu S, Negrin LL (2011) Intramedullary nailing in fracture treatment: history, science and Kuntscher’s revolutionary influence in Vienna, Austria. Injury 42:S1–S5. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(11)00419-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. International SFC (2012) Technique manual of SIGN IM nail & interlocking screw system insertion & extraction guide, Richland

  16. CPI Inflation Calculator, United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics

  17. Zirkle LG Jr (2008) Injuries in developing countries–how can we help? The role of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 10:2443–2450. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0387-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frye J (ed) (2014) International drug price indicator guide. Management Sciences for Health I, Medford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barnum H, Kutzin J (1993) World Bank. Public hospitals in developing countries: resource use, cost, financing. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

  20. Gosselin RA, Heitto M, Zirkle L (2009) Cost-effectiveness of replacing skeletal traction by interlocked intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures in a provincial trauma hospital in Cambodia. Int Orthop 33(5):1445–1448. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0798-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Table, World Bank (2014)

  22. Iotov A, Takov E, Ivanov V et al (1996) Infraisthmal femoral fractures: cast bracing or interlocking intramedullary nailing? Ortopediya i Travmatologiya 2:58

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ikem IC, Oginni LM, Bamgboye EA (2001) Open fractures of the lower limb in Nigeria. Int Orthop 6:386–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandrella B (2002) The conservative treatment of femur fractures by Perkins traction. Management in adverse situations. Unfallchirurg 105(10):923–931. doi:10.1007/s00113-002-0467-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gosselin R, Lavaly D (2007) Perkins traction for adult femoral shaft fractures: a report on 53 patients in Sierra Leone. Int Orthop 31(5):697–702. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0233-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clasper JC, Rowley DI (2009) Outcome, following significant delays in initial surgery, of ballistic femoral fractures managed without internal or external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):97–101. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.21106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bezabeh B, Wamisho BL, Coles MJ (2012) Treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures using the Perkins traction at Addis Ababa Tikur Anbessa University Hospital: the Ethiopian experience. Int Surg 97(1):78–85. doi:10.9738/cc48.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Doorgakant A, Mkandawire NC (2012) The management of isolated closed femoral shaft fractures in a district hospital in Malawi. Trop Dr 42(1):8–12. doi:10.1258/td.2011.110211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Opondo E, Wanzala P, Makokha A (2013) Cost effectiveness of using surgery versus skeletal traction in management of femoral shaft fractures at Thika level 5 hospital, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J 15:42. doi:10.11604/pamj.2013.15.42.2451

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Eliezer E, Haonga B, Morshed S et al (2015) Predictors of reoperation for adult femoral shaft fractures treated operatively in Tanzania. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting, San Diego

  31. Kramer EJ, Shearer D, Morshed S (2016) The use of traction for treating femoral shaft fractures in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3081-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samandari T, Bishai D, Luteijn M et al (2011) Costs and consequences of additional chest X-ray in a tuberculosis prevention program in Botswana. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183(8):1103–1111. doi:10.1164/rccm.201004-0620OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs B, Mercer A (1999) Feasibility of hospital-based blood banking: a Tanzanian case study. Health Policy Plan 14(4):354–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Duke T, Peel D, Wandi F et al (2010) Oxygen supplies for hospitals in Papua New Guinea: a comparison of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of methods for different settings. P N G Med J 53(3–4):126–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Janson J, Marais F, Mehtar S et al (2012) Costs and process of in-patient tuberculosis management at a central academic hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Public Health Action 2(3):61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cleary S, Boulle A, McIntyre D et al (2004) Cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive adults in a South African township. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 4:20. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-4-20

  37. Collins D, Gupta P, Sovannarith E (2009) Cost projections for the complementary package of activities for referral hospitals: Ministry of Health, Royal Government of CambodiaBasic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival (USAID/BASICS). United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Arlington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Rondall Lane (UCSF), Associate Professor of Anesthesia, UCSF School of Medicine, for assistance in developing anaesthetic medicine cost equations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik J. Kramer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential or real conflicts of interest to report.

Appendix: equations and assumptions

Appendix: equations and assumptions

See Table 5.

Table 5 Processes comprising time and motion analysis

Disposable supply cost details

The median supplier cost given in the database was used in this analysis with the exception of midazolam for which only a buyer median price was reported. For medications packaged in large multiuse vials, the total volume per unit was divided by the volume used and multiplied by the unit cost to assess the cost used in each procedure. The unit cost of gauze, scalpels, and needles were obtained from MOI. The cost of single-use X-ray materials were estimated from a 2008 study in Botswana [32]. The unit cost of a 500 mL transfusion was taken from a 1999 study in Tanzania [33]. The cost per litre (CPL) of oxygen gas produced from a central oxygen generator using grid electricity was estimated using the parameters of a 2010 cost study in Papua New Guinea and Eqs. 3 and 4 [34]. The cost of halothane or isoflurane used in each procedure was calculated with Eq. 5. For each patient, the costs of each supply used was summed to give a total supply and medication cost per patient.

Equation 1: Surgical personnel costs per patient (CPP)

Salaries were separated into nine occupational categories (attending orthopaedic surgeon, anaesthesiologist, medical resident, nurse anaesthetist, nurse, radiology technician, or hospital assistant):

$${\text{Total}}\;{\text{surgical}}\; {\text{CPP}}\; = \; \mathop \sum \nolimits ({\text{Person}}\; {\text{hours}}\; {\text{category}}_{i} \times {\text{wage}}^{a} )$$
(1)

where a is the mean wage of ward staff, calculated by dividing the mean annual salary by 1840, the product of 8 h days and 230 working days per year (365–104 weekend days–15 sick days and 16 holidays).

Equation 2: Ward personnel CPP calculated for general and private wards separately

$${\text{Ward}}\;{\text{personnel}}\;{\text{CPP}} = \frac{{\# {\text{Workers}}_{1} + \# {\text{workers}}_{2} }}{2} \times \frac{{{\text{Wage}}^{a} \times 24 \;{\text{h}} \times {\text{LOS}}^{b} }}{{\# {\text{Patients}}^{c} }},$$
(2)

where \(\# {\text{workers}}_{1}\) is the number of staff during normal hours (6AM–6PM), \(\# {\text{workers}}_{2}\) is the number of staff during off-hours (6PM–6AM), a is the mean wage of ward staff, b is the patient length of stay, and c is the number of patients in ward.

Equation 3: Oxygen capital cost per litre (CPL)

$${\text{Capital}}\;{\text{CPL}} = \frac{{\left( {{\text{Oxygen }}\;{\text{generator}}\;{\text{cost}} + {\text{building cost}} + {\text{piping costs}}} \right) + \left( {{\text{Maintenance}} \times 10\;{\text{years}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Total}}\; {\text{litres}}\; {\text{produced }} 10\;{\text{years}}}}.$$
(3)

Equation 4: Oxygen electrical cost per litre (CPL)

$${\text{Electrical CPL}} = \frac{{{\text{Running}}\;{\text{power}}^{a} \times 0.63^{b} \times \$ 0.07/{\text{kWh}}^{c} }}{{{\text{Maximum }}\;{\text{hourly}}\;{\text{capacity}}\;({\text{L}})^{d} }}{\text{}}$$
(4)

where a is the (([{#Beds  × 0.75} + {all ORs × 10}] × peak hours/week × 60 min × 52 weeks) + ([{#beds × 0.75} + {emergency OR × 10}] × non-peak hours/week × 60 min × 52 weeks)) × 10, b is the capacity factor based on litres needed during peak/non-peak hours, c is the TANESCO price/kWh for high power users (December 2014 prices), and d is the assuming system is designed for operation at calculated peak need +10 %, (6000 L/h).

Equation 5: Liquid volume of halothane and isoflurane used in anaesthesia

$$V_{l} = \frac{{Q_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }} tMP}}{22.4\rho },$$
(5)

where \(Q_{{{\text{O}}_{2} }}\) is the oxygen flow rate (L/min), P is the percent by gaseous volume of the compound, M is the molecular weight of the compound (g/mol), and t is the time (min) and \(\rho\) is the density of the compound (g/mL) at 20 °C.

Equation 6: Femur fixation-specific instrument set costs per patient (CPP)

$${\text{Instrument}}\;{\text{CPP}} = \frac{{{\text{Instrument }}\;{\text{set }}\;{\text{cost}} \times \# {\text{sets}}}}{{{\text{Procedures}} \;{\text{per}}\;{\text{year}}^{a} \times {\text{lifespan}}}},$$
(6)

where a is the Femoral shaft fixation procedures per year.

Equation 7: Administrative and ancillary staff costs per patient, patient-day equivalent (PDE) method

$$\begin{aligned} \left( {\text{i}} \right) {\text{Total}}\;{\text{PDEs}} = {\text{Inpatient}}\;{\text{days}} + \frac{{{\text{Outpatient}}\;{\text{visits}}}}{{{\text{Inpatient}}\;{\text{equivalence}}\;{\text{ratio}}^{a} }} \hfill \\ \left( {\text{ii}} \right){\text{Femur}}\;{\text{PDEs}} = \frac{{\# {\text{Patients }} \times {\text{LOS}}}}{\text{Total PDE}} \hfill \\ \left( {\text{iii}} \right){\text{Cost}}\;{\text{per}}\;{\text{patient}} = \frac{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{staff}}\;{\text{cost }} \times {\text{Femur PDEs}}}}{{\# {\text{Femur}}\;{\text{cases}} }} \hfill \\ \end{aligned},$$
(7)

where a is the inpatient equivalence ratio (IER) built by averaging the IERs of three previously published cost studies (3, 3.77, 4) [3537].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kramer, E.J., Shearer, D.W., Marseille, E. et al. The Cost of Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. World J Surg 40, 2098–2108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3496-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3496-z

Keywords

Navigation