Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Lateral Pelvic Lymph-Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lateral pelvic lymph-node metastasis.

Patients

Eighty-four patients with primary lower rectal cancer were examined by MRI and subsequently underwent radical surgery with lateral pelvic lymph-node dissection, without preoperative treatment. Lateral lymph-node metastases were assessed preoperatively by MRI, and the results were compared with the histopathological findings. The criterion for lateral lymph-node metastasis was any recognizable lymph node in the pelvic wall, regardless of diameter.

Result

Lateral pelvic lymph-node metastasis was diagnosed on preoperative MRI in 16 patients (19.9 %). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI were 75, 69.1, 36.4, 92.2, and 70.2 %, respectively. When a cut-off value of 10 mm was used for diagnosis, the corresponding values were 43.8, 98.5, 87.5, 88.1, and 88.1 %, respectively. The mean diameter of metastatic nodes (14.7 mm) was significantly larger than that of negative nodes (5.7 mm; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

MRI is an effective technique for predicting lateral pelvic node involvement and thus may facilitate preoperative decision-making in rectal cancer treatment. A cut-off value of 10 mm is useful for avoiding unnecessary lateral lymph-node dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83(3):375–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2011) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12(6):575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi T, Ueno M, Azekura K, Ohta H (2000) Lateral node dissection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43(10 Suppl):S59–S68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1997) Importance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. World J Surg 21(7):728–732. doi:10.1007/s002689900298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2007) Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg 245(1):80–87

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y (2009) Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2779–2786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizukami Y, Ueda S, Mizumoto A et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer. World J Surg 35(4):895–899. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-0986-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LeBlanc JK (2007) Imaging and management of rectal cancer. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(12):665–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Imaging for predicting the risk factors–the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease–of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26(4):259–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goligher JCDH, Nixon HH (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, 5th edn. Bailliere Tindall, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Jpn J Surg 13(6):557–573 (1983)

  14. Moriya Y, Hojo K, Sawada T, Koyama Y (1989) Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection. Dis Colon Rectum 32(4):307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T (2005) Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(6):756–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hojo K, Koyama Y, Moriya Y (1982) Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Surg 144(3):350–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambregts DM, Beets GL, Maas M et al (2011) Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 253(3):539–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90(3):355–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW et al (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227(2):371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gearhart SL, Frassica D, Rosen R, Choti M, Schulick R, Wahl R (2006) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13(3):397–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heriot AG, Hicks RJ, Drummond EG et al (2004) Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Kamikonya N et al (1994) Preoperative detection of local extension of carcinoma of the rectum using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Surg 179(6):653–656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Indinnimeo M, Grasso RF, Cicchini C et al (1996) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Int Surg 81(4):419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Ishibe.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There is no grant support and no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishibe, A., Ota, M., Watanabe, J. et al. Prediction of Lateral Pelvic Lymph-Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. World J Surg 40, 995–1001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3299-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3299-7

Keywords

Navigation