Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Two hundred thirty two patients with rectal cancer at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent extended systematic lymphadenectomy, especially lateral node dissection, were reviewed with respect to survival rate, degree of surgical technique, and mode of recurrence. On the basis of the extent of lateral node spread, two types of lateral node dissection were performed, consisting of preservation of internal iliac vessels (conventional) anden bloc excision of these vessels (extended). The overall disease-free five-year survival rate was 69.4 percent in all patients—75.8 percent for those who underwent extended resection and 67.4 percent for those who underwent conventional resection an excellent survival rate of 49 percent of patients with lateral node metastasis was obtained. The analysis was carried out with regard to prognostic factors such as number of node metastases, obesity index, mode of recurrence, etc. We would recommend that systemic lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection be performed for advanced rectal cancer at or below the peritoneal reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. The clinical correlation of an autopsy study of recurrent colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1979;189:496–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbertson VA. Adenocarcinoma of the rectum: indicence and locations of recurrent tumor following present-day operations performed for cure. Ann Surg 1960;151:340–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bacon HE. Major surgery of the colon and rectum: rehabilitation and survival rate in 2,457 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1960;3: 393–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grinnell RS. Results of ligation of inferior mesenteric artery at the aorta in resections of carcinoma of the descending and sigmoid colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965;120:1031–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott F, Hughes E, Pihe E, Milne BJ, Price AB. Long term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154: 833–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolmark N, Fisher B. An analysis of survival and treatment failure following abdominoperineal and sphincter-saving resection in Dukes' B and C rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:480–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deddish MR. Discussion of the treatment of advanced cancer of the rectum. Proc Soc Med 1950;43:1075–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deddish MR. Surgical procedures for carcinoma of the left colon and rectum, with five-year end results following adominopelvic dissection of lymph nodes. Am J Surg 1960;99:188–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stearns MW Jr, Deddish MR. Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carconoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sauer I, Bacon HE. Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicability of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg 1951;81:111–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koyama Y, Moriya Y, Hojo K. Effects of extended systematic lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: significant improvement of survival rate and decrease of local recurrence. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1984;14:623–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hojo K, Koyama Moriya Y. Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1982;144:350–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moriya Y, Hojo K. Early detection of recurrent colorectal carcinoma and results of surgical treatment. In: Lapis K, Eckhardt S, eds. Lectures and symposia of the 14th international cancer congress. Budapes: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1986:41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goligher J, Duthie H, Nixon H. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London. Bailliere Tindall, 1984:595–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Enker WE, Lafter UT, Block GE. Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection. Ann Surg 1979;190:350–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moriya Y, Koyama Y, Hojo K, Itabashi H, Hirota T. Local recurrence after sphincter-saving procedure for carcinoma of the rectum. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1980;10:265–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Moriya, Y., Hojo, K., Sawada, T. et al. Significance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 307–315 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553486

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553486

Key words

Navigation