Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inventing the Future of Surgery

  • Surgical Symposium Contribution
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical innovation relies on patient safety and quality of life, which require a drastic iatrogenic impact reduction. A parallel development toward less invasive approaches has occurred in the field of surgery, interventional radiology, and endoscopy. Minimally invasive techniques provide unquestionable benefits to patients in terms of postoperative outcome. However, those techniques are not intuitive, and extensive training is required to overcome the inherent challenges and to be proficient and consequently to achieve a steep learning curve. Technologies have been developed by computer science and robotics departments, which might improve minimally invasive techniques. A new concept of cyber therapies is emerging through the development of computer and robotic sciences aiming at human–machine integration. Additionally, the convergence of surgery, endoscopy, and interventional radiology toward a hybrid therapeutic modality, namely image-guided minimally invasive procedures, holds promises insofar as they could well maximize benefits in terms of efficacy and iatrogenic impact. In the present manuscript, the mainstays of these new paradigm developments are briefly outlined in light of our experience and vision of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ooki A, Nagao G, Masaki T, Mori T, Sugiyama M (2013) Recent developments in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: towards the era of endoscopic resection of layers deeper than the submucosa. Dig Endosc Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc 25(Suppl 1):64–70

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen J (2013) A novel opportunity in minimally invasive colorectal cancer therapy: defining a role for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Diagn Ther Endosc 2013:681783

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678-683; quiz 645

  10. Nicolau SA, Vemuri A, Wu HS, Huang MH, Ho Y, Charnoz A, Hostettler A, Forest C, Soler L, Marescaux J (2011) A cost effective simulator for education of ultrasound image interpretation and probe manipulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 163:403–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forest C, Comas O, Vaysiere C, Soler L, Marescaux J (2007) Ultrasound and needle insertion simulators built on real patient-based data. Stud Health Technol Inform 125:136–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soler L, Delingette H, Malandain G, Ayache N, Koehl C, Clement JM, Dourthe O, Marescaux J (2000) An automatic virtual patient reconstruction from CT-scans for hepatic surgical planning. Stud Health Technol Inform 70:316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Agostino J, Diana M, Soler L, Vix M, Marescaux J (2012) 3D virtual neck exploration prior to parathyroidectomy. N Engl J Med 367:1072–1073

  15. Iseki H, Masutani Y, Iwahara M, Tanikawa T, Muragaki Y, Taira T, Dohi T, Takakura K (1997) Volumegraph (overlaid three-dimensional image-guided navigation). Clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68:18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner A, Ploder O, Enislidis G, Truppe M, Ewers R (1995) Virtual image guided navigation in tumor surgery–technical innovation. J Cranio Maxillo Facial Surg Off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio Maxillo Facial Surg 23:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolau SA, Pennec X, Soler L, Buy X, Gangi A, Ayache N, Marescaux J (2009) An augmented reality system for liver thermal ablation: design and evaluation on clinical cases. Med Image Anal 13:494–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M, Mutter D, Soler L (2004) Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Am Med Assoc 292:2214–2215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mutter D, Soler L, Marescaux J (2010) Recent advances in liver imaging. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:613–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino J, Diana M, Vix M, Nicolau S, Soler L, Bourhala K, Hassler S, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2013) Three-dimensional metabolic and radiologic gathered evaluation using VR-RENDER fusion: a novel tool to enhance accuracy in the localization of parathyroid adenomas. World J Surg 37:1618–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Agostino J, Wall J, Soler L, Vix M, Duh QY, Marescaux J (2013) Virtual neck exploration for parathyroid adenomas: a first step toward minimally invasive image-guided surgery. JAMA Surg 148:232–238; discussion 238

  22. Marzano E, Piardi T, Soler L, Diana M, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Pessaux P (2013) Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreatico-duodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 17:1980–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diana M, Pessaux P, Marescaux J (2014) New technologies for single-site robotic surgery in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 21:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, Piardi T, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2014) Robotic duodenopancreatectomy assisted with augmented reality and real-time fluorescence guidance. Surg Endosc 28:2493–2498

  25. Hostettler A, Nicolau SA, Remond Y, Marescaux J, Soler L (2010) A real-time predictive simulation of abdominal viscera positions during quiet free breathing. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 103:169–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haouchine N, Dequidt J, Berger MO, Cotin S (2013) Deformation-based augmented reality for hepatic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 184:182–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Umale S, Chatelin S, Bourdet N, Deck C, Diana M, Dhumane P, Soler L, Marescaux J, Willinger R (2011) Experimental in vitro mechanical characterization of porcine Glisson’s capsule and hepatic veins. J Biomech 44:1678–1683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Diana M, Wall J, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Gonzales KD, Harrison MR, Agnus V, Soler L, Nicolau S, Marescaux J (2011) Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendez-vous technique. Surg Innov 18:317–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 13:86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Vix M, Leroy J, Pessaux P, Marescaux J (2013) Innovations in minimally invasive surgery: lessons learned from translational animal models. Langenbeck’s Archiv Surg/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 398:919–923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826; discussion 826-827

  33. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Marescaux J (2009) Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy. Brit J Surg 96:1162–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Eleftheriadis N, Inoue H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Yoshida A, Hosoya T, Maselli R, Kudo SE (2012) Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 8:329–342

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Costamagna G, Marchese M, Familiari P, Tringali A, Inoue H, Perri V (2012) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia: preliminary results in humans. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver 44:827–832

    Google Scholar 

  36. Inoue H, Kudo SE (2010) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for 43 consecutive cases of esophageal achalasia. Nihon rinsho Jpn J Med 68:1749–1752

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rieder E, Swanstrom LL, Perretta S, Lenglinger J, Riegler M, Dunst CM (2013) Intraoperative assessment of esophagogastric junction distensibility during per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 27:400–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2012) STEPS to POEM: introduction of a new technique at the IRCAD. Surg Innov 19:216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S, Fiolka A, Can S, Hann von Weyhern C, Schneider A, Feussner H (2007) An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES. Endoscopy 39:401–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Costantino FA, Diana M, Wall J, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2012) Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections. Surg Endosc 26:1495–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leroy J, Diana M, Perretta S, Wall J, De Ruijter V, Marescaux J (2011) Original technique to close the transrectal viscerotomy access in a NOTES transrectal and transgastric segmental colectomy. Surg Innov 18:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Diana M, Leroy J, Wall J, De Ruijter V, Lindner V, Dhumane P, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2012) Prospective experimental study of transrectal viscerotomy closure using transanal endoscopic suture vs. circular stapler: a step toward NOTES. Endoscopy 44:605–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Rojas OA, Almenara R, Blasi A, Llach J (2008) MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: report of a transvaginal resection in the human. Surg Endosc 22:1717–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lamade W, Hochberger J, Ulmer C, Matthes K, Thon KP Triluminal hybrid NOS as a novel approach for colonic resection with colorectal anastomosis. Surg Innov 17:28–35

  45. Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV, Sbeih MA, Lacy AM, Rattner DW (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3396–3405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martinez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)–short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27:3165–3172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Leroy J, Barry BD, Melani A, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2013) No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg 148:226–230; discussion 231

  48. Leroy J, Diana M, Barry B, Mutter D, Melani AG, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Perirectal oncologic gateway to retroperitoneal endoscopic single-site surgery (PROGRESSS): a feasibility study for a new NOTES approach in a swine model. Surg Innov 19:345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dhumane PW, Diana M, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2011) Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: a technological review. J Minim Access Surg 7:40–51

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH, Dallemagne B, Demartines N, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2013) Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27:4130–4135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Barry B, Marescaux J (2013) The ANUBISCOPE(R) flexible platform ready for prime time: description of the first clinical case. Surg Endosc 27:2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Franklin ME Jr, Ramos R, Rosenthal D, Schuessler W (1993) Laparoscopic colonic procedures. World J Surg 17:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Diana M, Perretta S, Wall J, Costantino FA, Leroy J, Demartines N, Marescaux J (2011) Transvaginal specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: current state of the art. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol GB Irel 13:e104–e111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Diana M, Wall J, Costantino F, D’Agostino J, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2011) Transanal extraction of the specimen during laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol GB Irel 13(Suppl 7):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  55. Diana M, Dhumane P, Cahill RA, Mortensen N, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2011) Minimal invasive single-site surgery in colorectal procedures: current state of the art. J Minim Acces Surg 7:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  56. Leroy J, Diana M, Wall J, Costantino F, D’Agostino J, Marescaux J (2011) Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) with transanal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) sigmoidectomy: a new step before pure colorectal natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(R)). J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 15:1488–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Leroy J, Perretta S, Diana M, Wall J, Lindner V, Harrison M, Marescaux J (2012) An original endoluminal magnetic anastomotic device allowing pure NOTES transgastric and transrectal sigmoidectomy in a porcine model: proof of concept. Surg Innov 19:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J, Deruijter V, Gonzales KD, Lindner V, Harrison M, Marescaux J (2013) MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Diana M, Mutter D, Lindner V, Vix M, Chung H, Demartines N, Marescaux J (2014) A modular magnetic anastomotic device for minimally invasive digestive anastomosis: proof of concept and preliminary data in the pig model. Surg Endosc 28:1613–1623

  60. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Duran C, Lumsden AB, Bismuth J (2014) A randomized, controlled animal trial demonstrating the feasibility and safety of the magellan endovascular robotic system. Ann Vasc Surg 28:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Guy Temporal, Christopher Burel, and Lucie Oudot for their assistance in proofreading the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Jacques Marescaux is the recipient of grants from Karl Storz Endoskope (Tuttlingen, Germany), Covidien (Boulder, Colorado), and Siemens Healthcare. Michele Diana is the recipient of a research grant from Karl Storz Endoskope (Tuttlingen, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Marescaux.

Additional information

This editorial follows the keynote lecture given by the first author at the International Surgical Week (ISW), which was held in Helsinki, Finland, August 25–29, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marescaux, J., Diana, M. Inventing the Future of Surgery. World J Surg 39, 615–622 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2879-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2879-2

Keywords

Navigation