Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stapleless Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Individual Vessel Dissection in Patients with Splenomegaly

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mechanical stapling devices have been established as a mainstay in laparoscopic splenectomy (LS), but limited data are available regarding stapleless LS for splenomegaly with individual vessel dissection (IVD). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of stapleless LS for splenomegaly and its potential advantage over staple-based LS.

Methods

A total of 51 patients with splenomegaly underwent stapleless LS and were subsequently reviewed. The data collected include the patients’ demographics, operative outcomes, and the rates of conversion to open surgery, complications, and mortality. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of the primary diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), and massive splenomegaly on the perioperative conversion rate.

Results

There were no deaths. The mean for various parameters are as follows: spleen length 21.6 cm; spleen weight 1,184 g, operating time 148 min, hospital stay 5.2 days, estimated blood loss 245 ml. The total conversion rate was 9.8 % (including one reoperation for bleeding). The presence of a BMI >30 % and hematologic malignancy—cofactors of portal hypertension (PH)—and a spleen weight >1,000 g were independent predictors of conversion to open surgery.

Conclusions

Stapleless LS for splenomegaly is feasible and safe in selected patients. It has advantages over traditional procedures using staples, at least in patients with benign splenomegaly. Patients with hematologic malignancy, BMI >30 %, coexistence of PH, and spleen weight >1,000 g are susceptible to bleeding during dissection of the splenic hilum, with use of IVD being relatively limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach: report of a case. Presse Med 20:2263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Targarona EM, Cerdan M, Trias M (2002) Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. In: Katkhouda N, editor. Soper N, editor-in-chief. Surgical diseases of the spleen. Problems in general surgery, vol 19. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 65–72

  3. Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Walsh RM et al (2002) Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Am J Surg 183:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Winslow ER, Brunt LM (2003) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis of complications. Surgery 134:647–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miles WF, Greig JD, Wilson RG et al (1996) Technique of laparoscopic splenectomy with a powered vascular linear stapler. Br J Surg 83:1212–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choy C, Cacchione R, Moon V et al (2004) Experience with seven cases of massive splenomegaly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:197–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B et al (2003) Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 238:235–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohta M, Nishizaki T, Matsumoto T et al (2005) Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:433–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reso A, Brar MS, Church N et al (2010) Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy with preoperative splenic artery embolization for massive splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 24:2008–2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kayaalp C, Aydin C, Olmez A (2009) Measurement of spleen size at laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Surg 33:1336. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9954-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahon D, Rhodes M (2003) Laparoscopic splenectomy: size matters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:248–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM et al (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy based on hematologic indication. Surg Endosc 16:272–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou J, Wu Z, Cai Y et al (2011) The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study. J Surg Res 171:e55–e60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Danielson PD, Shaul DB, Phillips JD et al (2000) Technical advances in pediatric laparoscopy have had a beneficial impact on splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg 35:1578–1581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomikawa M, Akahoshi T, Sugimachi K et al (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy may be a superior supportive intervention for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pattenden CJ, Mann CD, Metcalfe MS et al (2010) Laparoscopic splenectomy: a personal series of 140 consecutive cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:398–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelmini R, Romano F, Quaranta N et al (2006) Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency. Surg Endosc 20:991–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grahn SW, Alvarez J III, Kirkwood K (2006) Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Arch Surg 141:755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Owera A, Hamade AM, Bani Hani OI et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Targarona EM, Balague C, Trias M (2004) Is laparoscopic approach reasonable in cases of splenomegaly? Semin Laparosc Surg 11:185–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heniford BT, Park A, Walsh RM et al (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with normal-sized spleens versus splenomegaly: does size matter? Am Surg 67:854–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feldman LS (2011) Laparoscopic splenectomy: standardized approach. World J Surg 35:1487–1495. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1059-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Uraneus S, Grossman D, Ludwig L et al (2007) Laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Surg Endosc 21:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xin Z, Qingguang L, Yingmin Y (2009) Total laparoscopic versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization in the management of portal hypertension: a comparative study. Dig Surg 26:499–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanek A, Stefaniak T, Makarewicz W et al (2005) Accessory spleens: preoperative diagnostics—limitations and operational strategy in laparoscopic approach to splenectomy in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borrazzo EC, Daly JM, Morrisey KP et al (2003) Hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for giant spleens. Surg Endosc 17:918–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cadiere GB, Verroken R, Himpens J et al (1994) Operative strategy in laparoscopic splenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 179:668–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a Grant from the National Ministry of Health, China (No. 200802012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiaHong Dong.

Additional information

JingWang Tan and Yajuan Chu have contributed equally to this study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, J., Chu, Y., Tan, Y. et al. Stapleless Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Individual Vessel Dissection in Patients with Splenomegaly. World J Surg 37, 2300–2305 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2152-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2152-0

Keywords

Navigation