Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethical Debate: The Ethics of Not Performing Extended Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ethical debate about performing—or not—extended lymphadenectomy in patients with a gastrointestinal malignancy is approached in this work. It offers a thorough overview of the ethical principles. Problem-solving tools are provided to assist in framing the issues and resolving the conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J et al (1996) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial—The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 347:995–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J et al (1995) Randomized comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 345:745–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall JC (2006) Surgical decision-making: integrating evidence, inference and experience. Surg Clin North Am 86:201–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCullough LB (1998) John Gregory’s writings on medical ethics and philosophy of medicine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black HC (1970) Black′s law dictionary. West Publishing, St. Paul, p 563

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCullough LB, Jones JW, Brody BA (1998) Surgical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kant I (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysic of morals. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith CM (2005) Origin and uses of “primum non nocere”: above all, do no harm! J Clin Pharmacol 45:371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, revised edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adedeji S, Sokol DK, Palser T et al (2009) Ethics of surgical complications. World J Surg 33:732–737. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9907-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ (2010) Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kon AA (2006) Answering the question: “Doctor, if this were your child, what would you do?”. Pediatrics 118:393–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brock DE (2010) Ethical and value issues in insurance coverage for cancer treatment. Oncologist 15:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer JD (2003) Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis. J Am Coll Surg 196:410–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thall PF (2002) Ethical issues in oncology biostatistics. Stat Methods Med Res 11:429–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanna GB, Boshier PR, Knaggs A et al (2012) Improving outcomes after gastroesophageal cancer resection: can Japanese results be reproduced in Western centres? Arch Surg 147:738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pellegrino ED (1994) Patient autonomy and the physician’s ethics. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 27:171–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Emanuel EJ, Joffe S (2003) Ethics in oncology. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR et al (eds) Holland-Frei cancer medicine, 6th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW (2008) The ethics of surgical practice: cases, dilemmas and resolutions. Oxford University Press, New York, p 199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto R. Ferreres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferreres, A.R. Ethical Debate: The Ethics of Not Performing Extended Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer. World J Surg 37, 1821–1828 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2063-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2063-0

Keywords

Navigation