Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Redo Fundoplication

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nearly 15% of patients who undergo anti-reflux surgery report recurrent symptoms on long-term follow-up and may be candidates for redo anti-reflux surgery (redo-ARS). In the last 10 years, several studies have evaluated the feasibility and short-term results of redo-ARS. The purpose of the present study was to critically review our experience with 102 redo fundoplications with short- to medium-term follow-up and special emphasis on subjective outcomes for redo-ARS.

Methods

A retrospective chart analysis was done on consecutive 102 redo fundoplications performed between December 2003 and March 2008. The patients were divided into two groups, the open group (group A) and the laparoscopic (group B). Subjective symptom analysis was performed on an annual basis using a standard questionnaire.

Results

There was no significant difference in mean age, body mass index (BMI), or time since first surgery between the two groups. Significant differences were noted between operative time, estimated blood loss, and median hospital stay between the two groups. A total of 16 patients were found to have short esophagus and underwent Collis gastroplasty. Complications included 11 hollow viscus injuries seen in group A and 13 such injuries in group B. There was significant improvement in all symptom scores in the two groups, along with a significant decrease in the use of acid suppression therapy. In the open group 58% of patients rated their satisfaction as excellent compared to 90% in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

This study clearly establishes the safety and efficacy of redo laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with excellent outcomes after short- to medium-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C et al (1991) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khaitan L, Bhatt P, Richards W et al (2003) Comparison of patient satisfaction after redo and primary fundoplications. Surg Endosc 17:1042–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Furnee EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA et al (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1539–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Curet MJ, Josloff RK, Schoeb O et al (1999) Laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. Arch Surg 134:559–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Floch NR, Hinder RA, Klingler PJ et al (2999) Is laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery feasible? Arch Surg 134:733–737

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D et al (1999) Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 134:809–815 discussion 815–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD et al (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 230:595–604 discussion 604–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Szwerc MF, Wiechmann RJ, Maley RH et al (1999) Reoperative laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surgery 126:723–728 discussion 728–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Game PA et al (1999) Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 86:98–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Awad ZT, Filipi CJ, Mittal SK et al (2000) Left side thoracoscopically assisted gastroplasty: a new technique for managing the shortened esophagus. Surg Endosc 14:508–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlson MA, Frantzides CT (2001) Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10,735 reported cases. J Am Coll Surg 193:428–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franzen T, Bostrom J, Tibbling Grahn L et al (1999) Prospective study of symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux 10 years after posterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 86:956–960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD et al (1996) A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 223:673–685 discussion 685–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luostarinen M (1993) Nissen fundoplication for reflux esophagitis. long-term clinical and endoscopic results in 109 of 127 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 217:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrne JP, Smithers BM, Nathanson LK et al (2005) Symptomatic and functional outcome after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 92:996–1001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pessaux P, Arnaud JP, Delattre JF et al (2005) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: five-year results and beyond in 1340 patients. Arch Surg 140:946–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohnmacht GA, Deschamps C, Cassivi SD et al (2006) Failed antireflux surgery: results after reoperation. Ann Thorac Surg 81:2050–2053 discussion 2053–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittal SK, Awad ZT, M Tasset, Filipi CJ et al (2000) Preoperative predictability of the short esophagus. Surg Endosc 14:464–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khajanchee YS, O’Rourke R, Cassera MA et al (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery: subjective and objective outcomes in 176 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 142:785–901 discussion 791–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA et al (2005) When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg 241:861–869 discussion 869–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Granderath FA (2007) Measurement of the esophageal hiatus by calculation of the hiatal surface area (HSA). Why, when and how? Surg Endosc 21:2224–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee E, Frisella MM, Matthews BD et al (2007) Evaluation of acellular human dermis reinforcement of the crural closure in patients with difficult hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 21:641–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J et al (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:481–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK et al (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23:1219–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mittal SK, Bikhchandani J, Gurney O et al (2011) Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years. Surg Endosc 25:556–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iqbal A, Awad Z, Simkins J et al (2006) Repair of 104 failed anti-reflux operations. Ann Surg 244:42–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Legner A, Tsuboi K, Bathla L et al (2010) Reoperative antireflux surgery for dysphagia. Surg Endosc 25:1160–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Awais O, Luketich JD, Tam J et al (2008) Roux-en-Y near esophagojejunostomy for intractable gastroesophageal reflux after antireflux surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1954–1959 discussion 1959–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams VA, Watson TJ, Gellersen O et al (2007) Gastrectomy as a remedial operation for failed fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 11:29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Makris KI, Lee T, Mittal SK (2009) Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2226–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lamb PJ, Myers JC, Jamieson GG et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of revisional surgery following laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 96:391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Avaro JP, D’Journo XB, Trousse D et al (2008) Long-term results of redo gastro-esophageal reflux disease surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:1091–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonatti H, Bammer T, Achem SR et al (2007) Use of acid suppressive medications after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: prevalence and clinical indications. Dig Dis Sci 52:267–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D et al (2001) Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285:2331–2338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oelschlager BK, Lal DR, Jensen E et al (2006) Medium- and long-term outcome of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc 20:1817–1823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeet Mittal.

Appendix: Post-procedure questionnaire

Appendix: Post-procedure questionnaire

 

figure a
figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bathla, L., Legner, A., Tsuboi, K. et al. Efficacy and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Redo Fundoplication. World J Surg 35, 2445–2453 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1250-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1250-0

Keywords

Navigation