This prospectively randomized study showed that a bilateral superficial cervical block combined with general anesthesia reduced postoperative pain and incidence and duration of severe PONV in patients who underwent thyroid and parathyroid operations.
Andrieu et al. [9] performed BSCPB with/without clonidine and found reduced intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement. However, other studies showed that local and regional anesthetic techniques did not decrease analgesic requirement after thyroid surgery [10, 11]. These results were based only on postoperative pain VAS and analgesic requirement. Procedure failure and ineffective regional anesthesia may sometimes be a problem. Unfortunately, there is no good method to confirm procedure success. Andrieu et al. used systolic blood pressure recorded at induction, incision, end of resection, and extubation to evaluate the process efficacy [9]. Among the three groups, we kept the same depth of anesthesia, maintaining a target range of arterial-line autoregressive index (AAI) between 15 and 25. The AAI is calculated from the middle latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and the electroencephalogram (EEG), and it is helpful in detecting intraoperative awareness with recall and decreasing anesthetic requirements [12, 13]. Struys et al. concluded that AAI monitoring is an accurate indicator of the level of sedation and loss of consciousness [14]. Lu et al. also demonstrated that, at an AAI of 20 ± 5, desflurane can maintain an adequate anesthetic effect [12]. Therefore, if concentration of end-tidal desflurane is reduced 1 h after BSCPB, it may help to confirm procedure success. In groups B and C in the present study, lower average concentration of end-tidal desflurane both proved the efficacy of regional anesthesia and lowered the incidence of PONV.
Different techniques and local anesthetic agents used for BSCPB in previous studies could be another reason for the controversy surrounding the use of this form of anesthesia. There are two-point and three-point injection techniques for BSCPB. The standard two-point injection technique is to insert the needle at the junction of the upper and middle thirds of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle at 1–2 cm depth (in a subcutaneous plane), then inject 2–3 ml prepared anesthetic cephalad toward the mastoid, and then inject the other 2–3 ml caudad toward the clavicle [15]. The three-point injection technique added the horizontal injection. Our technique of BSCPB is a modified two-point injection. We skipped the injection cephalad toward the mastoid; instead, we emphasized the lower neck compartment. Dieudonne et al. used a three-point injection with 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% and 1:200,000 epinephrine [4]. Andrieu et al. used a three-point injection with 10 ml ropivacaine and clonidine [9]. Eti et al. used a two-point injection with 0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml [10]. In addition to BSCPB, Suh, Inabnet, and Pintaric [16–18] used combined (superficial and deep) cervical plexus block. Levobupivacaine is the S(−)-enantiomer of the racemic local anesthetic bupivacaine. It is superior to bupivacaine for its less toxic effect on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems [19]. There are few studies comparing the efficacies of different local anesthetics in cervical blocks. Levobupivacaine seems to be more potent than bupivacaine in in vitro studies [20]. However, there is no difference between the two anesthetics in in vivo studies [21]. In our study, we found that levobupivacaine has a slightly longer duration of action.
Local anesthetic wound infiltration (LWI) is an excellent way to reduce postoperative pain in hernia operations [22]. For deeper procedures like thyroidectomy, the results are conflicting. Some investigators found BSCBP to be superior to LWI [1]; however Dieudonne et al. found no difference in reduction of postoperative analgesic requirement between the two techniques [4]. The reason for the controversy might be that there is no standard way to perform LWI, which affects a relatively smaller, more superficial acting area and is of shorter duration.
Nausea and vomiting after neck operations can be caused by intubations, inhalation anesthetics, perioperative analgesics, and surgical manipulation. Sonner et al. reported that 54% of their patients had nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy, with the incidence more common in women and in those who had inhalation anesthesia. They scored postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after thyroidectomy as grades 1–4 and defined severe PONV as grades 3 and 4 [2]. Our incidence of PONV in the three groups was 32.9%. This lower rate may be related to our routine use of 5 mg dexamethasone intravenously during thyroid operations [23]. Fewer patients in our groups B and C developed severe PONV. Unfortunately, our study did not have a large enough number of patients to detect differences in PONV among the three groups.
Post-thyroidectomy swallowing pain has received less attention in the literature. Suh et al. reported that bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with or without deep cervical plexus block reduced incision pain at rest and on swallowing at 0, 2, and 4 h postoperatively. They concluded that BSCPB is an effective technique with fewer side effects and greater patient satisfaction [16]. Again, in our study, because of the insufficient number of patients, there was no statistically valid basis from which to conclude if there was a difference in postoperative swallowing pain among the three groups. Superficial cervical block may not be able to cover deeper compartments to alleviate swallowing pain. We do not use deep cervical block because of the higher rate of complications, such as intravenous injection, hematoma, nerve injury, and unintended blockade of vagus nerve, brachial plexus [17], or phrenic nerve [24]. We had one patient (0.6%) who had a phrenic nerve and brachial plexus block that resolved after 6 h. She was thin and the injection was likely deeper than intended.
Cervical plexus block without general anesthesia is an option. Pintaric et al. used either superficial or combined cervical plexus block (CCPB) without general anesthesia effectively in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy [18]. Inabnet et al. and Arora et al. [17, 25] also found regional and local anesthesia without general anesthesia to be safe for same-day discharge after thyroidectomy. We have occasionally used superficial cervical plexus block without general anesthesia in high-risk patients. Factors that influence this decision may include goiter size, extent of operation, airway protection, fire risk, neck pressure, coughing during surgical manipulation, and patient anxiety. The percentage of conversion to general anesthesia was 1.8% because of ineffective anesthesia and changes in operative extent [17]. Contraindications for local/regional anesthesia without general anesthesia for thyroid surgery may include communication barrier (dementia, language barrier, mental retardation), planned sternotomy (retrosternal extension), additional procedures, known or suspected locally invasive cancer, allergy to local anesthetics, patient preference for general anesthesia, and cervical lymphadenectomy [25]. Either BSCPB or bilateral CCPB combined with general anesthesia may be safer and more widely applicable in low anesthetic risk patients.
In conclusion, bilateral superficial cervical plexus block is effective in reducing the amount of general anesthetic required during thyroidectomy. It also significantly lowers the severity of postoperative pain during the first 24 h and shortens the hospital stay.