Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic-Assisted Combined Colon and Liver Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Initial Experience

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic approaches have become increasingly used in selected patients with either colorectal or liver cancer. However, the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection in primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.

Methods

Laparoscopic surgery involving intestinal anastomosis was performed for primary colorectal cancer. The liver was then mobilized with the assistance of a hand inserted through the upper midline incision. For minor resections, the parenchymal transection was performed laparoscopically. For major resection involving a hilar dissection, transection was performed according to the standard open techniques under direct vision through the incision. Resected specimens were retrieved directly through the midline incision.

Results

Ten patients with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases underwent the above procedure between September 2006 and April 2007. Surgical procedures for colorectal cancer included 5 low anterior resections, 3 anterior resections, 1 right hemicolectomy, and 1 subtotal colectomy. Combined hepatic surgery included 6 major hepatectomies, 3 segmentectomies, and 1 tumorectomy. All procedures were successful, with no conversions to open surgery required. The median operation time was 439 min (range: 210–690 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 350 ml (range: 300–1,200 ml). There was no surgical mortality or major morbidity, except in one patient in whom postoperative bleeding at the site of para-aortic node dissection was promptly controlled.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Millikan KW, Staren ED, Doolas A (1997) Invasive therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. Surg Clin North Am 77:27–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beard SM, Holmes M, Price C et al (2000) Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Surg 232:763–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber JC, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2003) Simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 90:956–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyass S, Zamir G, Matot I et al (2001) Combined colon and hepatic resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 78:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips RK (2005) A companion to specialist surgical practice: colorectal surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A et al (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients. Surg Endosc 21:619–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms-a meta-analysis. Surgery 141:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2006) Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer and liver metastasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:486–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SH, Park SJ, Lee SA et al (2007) Various liver resections using hanging maneuver by three Glisson’s pedicles and three hepatic veins. Ann Surg 245:201–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraus T, Weitz J, Mehrabi A et al (1998) Monitoring of gastric PCO2 for evaluation of splanchnic mucosal microcirculatory impairment during mesenteric venous occlusion and reperfusion. Transplant Proc 30:833–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonce ME, Brackett DJ, Squires RA et al (1995) Development of circulatory and metabolic shock following transient portal triad occlusion. J Surg Res 59:534–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmandra TC, Mierdl S, Bauer H et al (2002) Transoesophageal echocardiography shows high risk of gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatic resection under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 89:870–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takagi S (1998) Hepatic and portal vein blood flow during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 12:427–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Litwin DE, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J et al (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg 231:715–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Group Southern Surgeons’ Club Study (1999) Handoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter trial of a minimally invasive technique for complex abdominal surgery. Arch Surg 134:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joels CS, Mostafa G, Matthews BD et al (2003) Factors affecting intravenous analgesic requirements after colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cali RL, Meade PG, Swanson MS et al (2000) Effect of morphine and incision length on bowel function after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43:163–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all anesthesiologists and surgery nurses for their assistance and patience in the development and execution of this surgical technique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok-Byung Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Lim, SB., Ha, Y.H. et al. Laparoscopic-Assisted Combined Colon and Liver Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Initial Experience. World J Surg 32, 2701–2706 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9761-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9761-z

Keywords

Navigation