Abstract
Background
Anal manometry is a useful tool for testing the effectiveness of surgical treatment. However, most techniques for anal pressure measurement are not easily available because of high cost. The aim of the present study was to introduce an easy and reproducible method for measuring anal pressures in testing the effectiveness of surgical procedures.
Materials and methods
We used a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube connected to a mercury manometer. After calibration of the system by inflating the distal (gastric) balloon and filling connection lines to the mercury manometer with 0.9% NaCl solution, resting and squeezing anal pressures were measured. The system was used on 50 human subjects (35 with anal fissure and 15 normal volunteers). Left lateral internal sphincterotomy had been performed in the anal fissure cases. Anal pressures were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 2 and 20.
Results
Preoperative resting anal pressures in the group with anal fissure (83.4 ± 1 mmHg) were significantly higher than those in the group of normal individuals (52 ± 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.001). Resting anal pressures after the sphincterotomy (29 ± 1 mmHg) were found to be significantly lower on POD 2, and resting anal pressure measurements (47 ± 1 mmHg) on POD 20 were lower than the corresponding preoperative values. These values are closer to those of normal volunteers (p = 0.016).
Conclusions
Anal manometry can be performed with this easily constructible and inexpensive system. This reproducible method can be used in the assessment of the results of surgical treatment in patients with anal and perianal diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coller JA. Clinical application of anorectal manometry. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987;16:17–33
Gibbons JP, Read NW. Anal hypertonia in fissures: cause or effect? Br J Surg 1986;73:443–445
Hannock AF. Measurement of anal pressure and motility. Gut 1976;17: 645–651
Schouten WR, van Vroonhoven TJ. A simple method of anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:721–724
Karoui S, Boubaker J, Filali A. Technical aspects and indications of anorectal manometry. Tunis Med 2005;83:315–319
Ram E, Alper D, Stein GY, et al. Internal anal sphincter function following lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a long-term manometric study. Ann Surg 2005;242:208–211
Orrom WI, Williams JG, Rothengerber DA. Portable anorectal manometry. Br J Surg 1990;77:876–877
Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P, et al. Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. Am J Surg 2005;189:429–434
Iaconoa G, Bonventreb S., Scalicia C, et al. Food intolerance and chronic constipation: manometry and histology study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:143–150
Gearhart S., Hull T, Floruta C, et al. Anal manometric parameters: predictors of outcome following anal sphincter repair? J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:115–120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Günal, Ö., Gürleyik, E., Arikan, Y. et al. Assessment of Anal Sphincter Function by Sengstaken-Blakemore Tube Anal Manometry. World J. Surg. 31, 399–402 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0365-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0365-1