Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Helical CT and CT Arterial Portography for Colorectal Liver Metastastes

  • INVITED COMMENTARY
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002;236:397–406; discussion 406–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choti MA, Bowman HM, Pitt HA, et al. Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:11–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, et al. Survival after resection of multiple hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:643–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg 1995;19:59–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999;230:309–318; discussion 318–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez FG, Drebin JA, Linehan DC, et al. Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). Ann Surg 2004;240:438–447; discussion 447–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valls C, Andia E, Sanchez A, et al. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT. Radiology 2001;218:55–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olsen AK. Intraoperative ultrasonography and the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1990;77:998–999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker GA, Lawrence W Jr, Horsley JS 3rd, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound of the liver affects operative decision making. Ann Surg 1989;209:569–576; discussion 576–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt J, Strotzer M, Fraunhofer S, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography versus helical computed tomography and computed tomography with arterioportography in diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: lesion-by-lesion analysis. World J Surg 2000;24:43–47; discussion 48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soyer P, Levesque M, Elias D, et al. Detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative US and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1992;183:541–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Orgeon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, L223A, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Kevin G. Billingsley MD

Authors
  1. Kevin G. Billingsley MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin G. Billingsley MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Billingsley, K.G. Comparison of Helical CT and CT Arterial Portography for Colorectal Liver Metastastes. World J. Surg. 30, 1900–1901 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0345-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0345-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation