Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Long Time Conservation of Heavily Grazed Shrubland: A Case Study in the Northern Negev, Israel

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major reasons for desertification is unrestricted grazing leading to vegetation depletion, soil erosion and degradation, phenomena often considered irreversible in the short term. Here, we compare soil and biological parameters of degraded and conserved, recently rehabilitated arid shrubland in the Northern Negev, Israel. The study area was restored by conservation efforts including a strictly controlled grazing regime initiated in 1992. The visually recognizable improvement in the ecology of the restored shrubland is reflected in significant improvement in all examined biotic (herbaceous biomass, shrub patch density, and insect activity), and soil parameters (nutrients, organic matter content, moisture, and water infiltration). The difference is created predominantly by restoration of large biological patches composed of shrubs and other perennial plants often associated with ant or termite nests, where the most significant increases in productivity and soil quality were observed. In the conserved shrubland such patches covered 35 or 25 % of the area (in a normal and a drought year, respectively). In the degraded shrubland 5 % or less of the area was occupied by such patches that were much smaller and of lower biological complexity. With respect to plant biodiversity, six plant species were found only—and 18 others became significantly more common—in the rehabilitated area. The results of this article indicate that functional arid drylands can be restored within <16 years relying on strict conservation management with reduced grazing intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd El-Ghani MM (1997) Environmental correlates of species distribution in arid desert ecosystems of eastern Egypt. J Arid Environ 38:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar M, Sala OE (1999) Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Tree 14(7):273–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson J, Floret C, LeFloc’h E, Ovalle C, Pontanier R (1993) Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. II. Case Studies in Southern Tunisia, Central Chile and Northern Cameroon. Restor Ecol 1(3):168–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Martin RE, Harris AT (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses and global change. Ann Rev Environ Resour 29:99–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Ward JP, Havstad KM (2006) Soil geomorphic heterogeneity governs patchy vegetation dynamics at an arid ecotone. Ecology 87:963–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeken B, Orenstein D (2001) The effect of plant litter on ecosystem properties in a Mediterranean semi-arid shrubland. J Veg Sci 12:825–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AM, Kendi FD, Ward PS (2005) Species richness, abundance, and composition of ground-dwelling ants in Northern California grasslands: role of plants, soil, and grazing. Environ Entomol 34(1):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breshears DD, Barnes FJ (1999) Interrelationships between plant functional types and soil moisture heterogeneity for semiarid landscapes within the grassland/forest continuum: a unified conceptual model. Landscape Ecol 14(5):465–478

  • Chesson P, Gebauer RLE, Schwinning S, Huntly N, Wiegand K, Ernest MSK, Sher A, Novoplansky A, Weltzin JF (2004) Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141(2):236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dregne HE, Chou N-T (1992) Global desertification dimensions and costs. In: Degradation and restoration of arid lands. Texas Tech. Univ. Press, Lubbock. http://www.ciesin.org/docs/002-186/002-186.html

  • Dunkerley DL (2002) Infiltration rates and soil moisture in a groved mulga community near Alice Springs, arid central Australia: evidence for complex internal rainwater redistribution in a runoff–runon landscape. J Arid Environ 51(2):199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge DJ, Zaady E, Shachak M (2000) Infiltration through three contrasting biological soil crusts in patterned landscapes in the Negev, Israel. Catena 40(3):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer RA, Turner NC (1978) Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29:277–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golodets C, Boeken B (2006) Moderate sheep grazing in semiarid shrubland alters small-scale soil surface structure and patch properties. Catena 65:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graetz RD, Tonngway DJ (2006) Influence of grazing management on vegetation, soil structure and nutrient distribution and the infiltration of applied rainfall in a semi-arid chenopod shrubland. Aust J Ecol 11(4):347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood KL, McKenzie BM (2001) Grazing effects on soil physical properties and the consequences for pastures: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 41(8):1231–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez JL, Jones CG (2006) Physical ecosystem engineers as agents of biogeochemical heterogeneity. Bioscience 56(3):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helman D, Mussery A, Lensky IM, Leu S (2014) Detecting changes in biomass productivity in different land management regimes in drylands using satellite-derived vegetation index. Soil Use Manage 30:32–39

  • Hille RisLambers R, Rietkerk M, van den Bosch F, Prins HT, de Kroon H (2001) Vegetation pattern formation in semi-arid grazing systems ecology: Ecology 82(1):50–61. http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/milieu/2008-0111-200607/rietkerk-01-veg%20pattern.pdf

  • Hogan C (2012) Overgrazing. http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155088

  • Huxman TE, Snyder KA, Tissue D, Leffler AJ, Ogle K, Pockman WT, Sandquist DR, Potts DL, Schwinning S (2004) Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, O’Connor TG (1999) On the relevance of nonequilibrium concepts to arid and semi-arid grazing systems. Ecol Appl 9(3):798–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouquet P, Dauber J, Lagerlo J (2006) Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Appl Soil Ecol 32:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassas M (1995) Desertification: a general review. J Arid Environ 30(2):455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéfi S, Rietkerk M, Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Papanastasis VP, ElAich A, de Ruiter PC (2007) Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems. Nature 449:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefi S, Alados CL, Chaves Y, Pueyo Y, Rietkerk M (2010) Is the patch size distribution of vegetation a suitable indicator of desertification processes? Comment. Ecology 91(12):3739–3742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee H, Imeson AC, Sarah P (1998) The impact of climate change on geomorphology and desertification along Mediterranean arid transect. Land Degrad Dev 9:407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesschen JP, Cammeraat LH, Kooijman AM, Van Wesemael B (2008) Development of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation and soil properties after land abandonment in a semi-arid ecosystem. J Arid Environ 72(11):2082–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu S, Mor-Mussery A, Lensky I (2011) GIS analysis of biological productivity and vegetation cover in a diverse arid landscape in the Northern Negev; February 21–24, 2011, Haifa, Israel. http://agri-sensing.technion.ac.il/Lectures%20PDF/Rangelands/Leu.pdf

  • Ludwig JA, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Tongway DJ, Imeson AC (2005) Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscape. Ecology 86(2):288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor-Mussery A, Leu S, Budovsky A (2013) Modeling the optimal grazing regime of Acacia victoriae silvopasture in the Northern Negev, Israel. J Arid Environ 94:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oba G, Vetaas OR, Stenseth NC (2001) Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands. J Appl Ecol 38:836–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsvig-Whittaker L, Frankenberg E, Perevolotsky A, Ungar EG (2006) Grazing, overgrazing and conservation: changing concepts and practices in the Negev rangelands. Sécheresse. 17(1): 195–199. http://www.john-libbey-eurotext.fr/en/revues/agro_biotech/sec/edocs/00/04/1F/12/resume.phtml?type=text.html

  • Osem Y, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J (2002) Grazing effect on diversity of annual plant communities in a semi-arid rangeland: interactions with small-scale spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity. J Ecol 90(6):936–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osem Y, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J (2007) Interactive effects of grazing and shrubs on the annual plant community in semi-arid Mediterranean shrublands. J Veg Sci 18:869–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo CA, Martin A (2006) Effects of grazing on patch structure in a semi-arid two-phase vegetation mosaic. J Veg Sci 16(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantis J,  Margaris NS (1988) Can systems dominated by asphodels be considered as semi-deserts? Int J Biometeorol 32:87–91

  • Safriel U, Adeel Z (2005). Dryland systems, in: ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Millennium ecosystem assessment series, vol 1. Island Press. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.291.aspx.pdf

  • Sall J, Lehman A (1996) JMP® Start statistics, chapter 6 (the difference between two means) and chapter 7 (comparing many means, one way analysis of variance). SAS Institute, Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Sava R (1994) Guide to sampling, air, water, soil and vegetation for chemical analysis. Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1999) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger Y, Leschnert H, Shmida A (1992) Activity pattern of harvester ants (Messor spp.) in the Negev desert ecosystem. J Arid Environ 23:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1999) Soil taxonomy a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn. United State Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

  • Wagner D, Jones JB (2004) The contribution of harvester ant nests, Pogonomyrmex rugosus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), to soil nutrient stocks and microbial biomass in the Mojave desert. Environ Entomol 33(3):599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21(2/3):213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaady E (2005) Seasonal change and nitrogen cycling in a patchy Negev desert: a review. Arid Land Res Manage 19:111–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the Oren and Eren families, the Yattir farm owners, for their help in implementing this research. We also thank the Israel Ministry of Science and the Wadi Attir association (Sustainable agriculture community) for sponsoring this project, and above all to Dr. Bert Boeken on his helpful comments and species analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Mor Mussery.

Appendix

Appendix

Absence: The species is absent from the studied shrubland (Grazed or Conserved).

Rare: The species appears in one plot in the studied shrubland (from “up,” “middle,” and “down” plots, Fig. 1).

Common: The species appears in two or three plots in the studied shrubland.

 

Latinist name

Conserved

Grazed

Forbs

1

Adonis dentata

Rare

Common

2

Anagallis arvensis

Absence

Rare

3

Arnebia decumbens

Rare

Rare

4

Artemisia crassifolia

Rare

Absence

5

Asteriscus pygmaeus

Common

Common

6

Astragalus cretaceus

Rare

Common

7

Astragalus tribuloides

Common

Absence

8

Bupleurum nodiflorum

Absence

Rare

9

Carthamus tenuis

Common

Common

10

Centauria hyalolepis

Common

Common

11

Cnicus beneficus

Rare

Rare

12

Dianthus strictus

Common

Rare

13

Echinops polyceras

Common

Absence

14

Filago contracta

Rare

Rare

15

Gundelia tourneforti

Common

Common

16

Heliotropium europaeum

Rare

Rare

17

Helianthemum lediflorum

Rare

Absence

18

Herniaria hirsuta

Absence

Rare

19

Hippocrepis unisiliquosa

Rare

Rare

20

Hymenocarpos circinnatus

Rare

Absence

21

Hormuzakia aggregata

Common

Absence

22

Medicago laciniata

Common

Rare

23

Neotorularia torulosa

Rare

Rare

24

Onobrychis cristata

Rare

Common

25

Paronychia argentea

Rare

Absence

26

Plantago coronopus

Absence

Common

27

Pterocephalus brevis

Absence

Rare

28

Reboudia pinnata

Rare

Rare

29

Roemeria hybrida

Absence

Rare

Shrubs

30

Atractylis serratuloides

Rare

Rare

31

Helianthemum ventosum

Rare

Absence

32

Noaea mucronata

Rare

Absence

33

Phagnalon rupestre

Common

Absence

Cryptophytes

34

Allium stamineum

Common

Rare

35

Asphodelus racemosus

Rare

Common

36

Carex pachystyla

Common

Common

37

Gynandriris sisyrhinchium

Common

Common

38

Scorzonera papposa

Rare

Rare

Hemi cryptophytes

39

Astragalus cichrous

Common

Rare

40

Gypsophila arabica

Rare

Rare

41

Eryngium creticum

Rare

Rare

42

Salvia lanigera

Absence

Rare

Graminoids

43

Avena barbata

Common

Absence

44

Broumus fasciculatus

Rare

Absence

45

Convolvulus lanatus

Rare

Absence

46

Rostraria cristata

Rare

Absence

47

Schismus arabicus

Common

Common

48

Stipa capensis

Common

Common

49

Vulpia ciliaris

Absence

Rare

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leu, S., Mussery, A.M. & Budovsky, A. The Effects of Long Time Conservation of Heavily Grazed Shrubland: A Case Study in the Northern Negev, Israel. Environmental Management 54, 309–319 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0286-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0286-y

Keywords

Navigation