Environmental Management

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 416–428 | Cite as

The Influence of Study Species Selection on Estimates of Pesticide Exposure in Free-Ranging Birds

  • Shannon L. Borges
  • Nimish B. Vyas
  • Mary C. Christman


Field studies of pesticide effects on birds often utilize indicator species with the purpose of extrapolating to other avian taxa. Little guidance exists for choosing indicator species to monitor the presence and/or effects of contaminants that are labile in the environment or body, but are acutely toxic, such as anticholinesterase (anti-ChE) insecticides. Use of an indicator species that does not represent maximum exposure and/or effects could lead to inaccurate risk estimates. Our objective was to test the relevance of a priori selection of indicator species for a study on pesticide exposure to birds inhabiting fruit orchards. We used total plasma ChE activity and ChE reactivation to describe the variability in anti-ChE pesticide exposure among avian species in two conventionally managed fruit orchards. Of seven species included in statistical analyses, the less common species, chipping sparrow (Spizella passerina), showed the greatest percentage of exposed individuals and the greatest ChE depression, whereas the two most common species, American robins (Turdus migratorius) and gray catbirds (Dumatella carolinensis), did not show significant exposure. Due to their lower abundance, chipping sparrows would have been an unlikely choice for study. Our results show that selection of indicator species using traditionally accepted criteria such as abundance and ease of collection may not identify species that are at greatest risk. Our efforts also demonstrate the usefulness of conducting multiple-species pilot studies prior to initiating detailed studies on pesticide effects. A study such as ours can help focus research and resources on study species that are most appropriate.


Anticholinesterase pesticide Birds Exposure Indicator species Orchard 


  1. Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5954–5959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bani L, Massimino D, Bottoni L, Massa R (2006) A multiscale method for selecting indicator species and priority conservation areas: a case study for broadleaved forests in Lombardy, Italy. Conserv Biol 20:512–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop CA, Collins B, Mineau P, Burgess NM, Read WF, Risley C (2000) Reproduction of cavity-nesting birds in pesticide-sprayed apple orchards in southern Ontario, Canada, 1988–1994. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:588–599Google Scholar
  4. Borges SL (2002) Exposure of free-flying birds to anticholinesterase insecticides in two conventionally managed fruit orchards. MS Thesis, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  5. Boutin C, Freemark KE, Kirk DA (1999) Farmland birds in southern Ontario: field use, activity patterns and vulnerability to pesticide use. Agric Ecosyst Environ 72:239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouvier J-C, Toubon J-F, Boivin T, Sauphanor B (2005) Effects of apple orchard management strategies on the great tit (Parus major) in southeastern France. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2846–2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouvier J-C, Ricci B, Agerberg J, Lavigne C (2011) Apple orchard pest control strategies affect bird communities in southeastern France. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess NM, Hunt KA, Bishop C, Weseloh DV (1999) Cholinesterase inhibition in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and Eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) exposed to organophosphorus insecticides in apple orchards in Ontario, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:708–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cobb GP, Mellott R, Brewer LW, Bens CM, Kendall RJ (2000) Diazinon dissipation from vegetation, occurrence in earthworms, and presence in avian gastrointestinal tracts collected from apple orchards following D-Z-N® 50W application. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1360–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott JE, Birmingham AL, Wilson LK, McAdie M, Trudeau S, Mineau P (2008) Fonofos poisons raptors and waterfowl several months after granular application. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fildes KJ, Szabo JK, Astheimer L, Hooper M, Buttemer WA (2009) Plasma cholinesterase characteristics in native Australian birds: significance for monitoring avian species for pesticide exposure. Emu 109:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleischli MA, Franson JC, Thomas NJ, Finley DL, Riley W Jr (2004) Avian mortality events in the United States caused by anticholinesterase pesticides: a retrospective summary of National Wildlife Health Center records from 1980 to 2000. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fluetsch KM, Sparling DW (1994) Avian nesting success and diversity in conventionally and organically managed apple orchards. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1651–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fryday SL, Hart ADM, Langton SD (1996) Effects of exposure to an organophosphorus pesticide on the behavior and use of cover by captive starlings. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1590–1596Google Scholar
  16. Gard NW, Hooper MJ (1993) Age-dependent changes in plasma and brain cholinesterase activities of Eastern bluebirds and European starlings. J Wildl Dis 29:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill H, Wilson LK, Cheng KM, Trudeau S, Elliott JE (2000) Effects of azinphos-methyl on American robins breeding in fruit orchards. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 65:756–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill H, Williams TD, Bishop CA, Cheng KM, Elliot JE (2004) Effects of azinphos-methyl on cholinergic responses and general health in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) after previous treatment with p,p′-DDE. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham DJ, DesGranges J (1993) Effects of the organophosphate azinphos-methyl on birds of potato fields and apple orchards in Quebec, Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 43:183–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greig-Smith PW (1990) Intensive study versus extensive monitoring in pesticide field trails. In: Somerville L, Walker CH (eds) Pesticide effects of terrestrial wildlife. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 217–239Google Scholar
  21. Grue CE, Fleming WJ, Busby DG, Hill EF (1983) Assessing hazards of organophosphate pesticides to wildlife. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 48:200–220Google Scholar
  22. Hardy AR (1990) Estimating exposure: the identification of species at risk and routes of exposure. In: Somerville L, Walker CH (eds) Pesticide effects of terrestrial wildlife. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 81–97Google Scholar
  23. Hensley MM, Cope JB (1951) Further data on removal and repopulation of the breeding birds in a spruce-fir forest community. Auk 68:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill EF (1992) Avian toxicology of anticholinesterases. In: Ballantyne B, Marrs TC (eds) Clinical and experimental toxicology of organophosphates and carbamates. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, pp 272–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill EF, Fleming WJ (1982) Anticholinesterase poisoning of birds: field monitoring and diagnosis of acute poisoning. Environ Toxicol Chem 1:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooper MJ, Detrich PJ, Weisskopf CP, Wilson BW (1989) Organophosphorus insecticide exposure in hawks inhabiting orchards during winter dormant-spraying. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 42:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunt KA, Hooper MJ (1993) Development and optimization of reactivation techniques for carbamate-inhibited brain and plasma cholinesterases in birds and mammals. Anal Biochem 212:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutto RL (1998) Using landbirds as an indicator species group. In: Marzluff JM, Sallabanks R (eds) Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 75–92Google Scholar
  29. Johnson EV, Mack GL, Thompson DQ (1976) The effects of orchard pesticide applications on breeding robins. Wilson Bull 88:16–35Google Scholar
  30. Jones J (2003) Tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor): a new model organism? Auk 120:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landres PB, Verner J, Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv Biol 2:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Millikin RL, Smith JNM (1990) Sublethal effects of fenitrothion on forest passerines. J Appl Ecol 27:983–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mineau P, Peakall DB (1987) An evaluation of avian impact assessment techniques following broad-scale forest insecticide sprays. Environ Toxicol Chem 6:781–791Google Scholar
  34. Mineau P, Fletcher MR, Glaser LC, Thomas NJ, Brassard C, Wilson LK, Elliott JE, Lyon LA, Henny CJ, Bollinger T, Porter SL (1999) Poisoning of raptors with organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides with emphasis on Canada, U.S., and U.K. J Raptor Res 33:1–37Google Scholar
  35. Moore NW (1966) A pesticide monitoring system with special reference to the selection of indicator species. J Appl Ecol 1966:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niemi GJ, McDonald ME (2004) Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons KC, Mineau P, Renfrew RB (2010) Effects of pesticide use in rice fields on birds. Waterbirds 33(sp1):193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patnode KA, White DH (1991) Effects of pesticides on songbird productivity in conjunction with pecan cultivation in southern Georgia: a multiple-exposure experimental design. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1479–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rattner BA, Fairbrother A (1991) Biological variability and the influence of stress on cholinesterase activity. In: Mineau P (ed) Cholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides: their impact on wildlife and the environment. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, pp 35–71Google Scholar
  40. Robinson SC, Kendall RJ, Robinson R, Driver CJ, Lacher TD Jr (1988) Effects of agricultural spraying of methyl parathion on cholinesterase activity and reproductive success in wild starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Environ Toxicol Chem 7:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rondeau G, DesGranges J (1995) Effects of insecticide use on breeding birds in Christmas tree plantations in Quebec. Ecotoxicology 4:281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith GJ (1987) Pesticide use and toxicology in relation to wildlife: organophosphorus and carbamate compounds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 170Google Scholar
  43. Stewart RE, Aldrich JW (1951) Removal and repopulation of breeding birds in a spruce-fir forest community. Auk 68:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stinson ER, Hayes LE, Bush PB, White DH (1994) Carbofuran affects wildlife on Virginia corn fields. Wildl Soc Bull 22:566–575Google Scholar
  45. Stone WB (1979) Poisoning of wild birds by organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. NY Fish Game J 26:38–47Google Scholar
  46. Strum KM, Hooper MJ, Johnson KA, Lanctot RB, Zacagnini ME, Sandercock BK (2010) Exposure of nonbreeding migratory shorebirds to cholinesterase inhibiting contaminants in the Western hemisphere. Condor 112:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson ID (2006) Monitoring of biodiversity indicators in boreal forests: a need for improved focus. Environ Monit Assess 121:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson HM, Langton SD, Hart ADM (1995) Prediction of inter-species differences in the toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides to wildlife—a biochemical approach. Comp Biochem Physiol 111C:1–12Google Scholar
  49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1992) Personal protective equipment. US Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 170, Section 240, as amended Sep 1, 2004. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  50. USEPA (1999) Methyl parathion, receipt of requests for cancellation; cancellation order. Federal Register vol. 64, No 207, Oct 27. USEPA, Washington, DC, pp 5787–5788Google Scholar
  51. USEPA (2006) Reregistration eligibility decision for methyl parathion. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/REDs/methyl_parathion_red.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2013
  52. Vergara P, Fargallo JA, Banda E, Parejo D, Lemus JA, Garcia-Montijano M (2008) Low frequency of anti-acetylcholinesterase pesticide poisoning in lesser and Eurasian kestrels in Spanish grassland and farmland populations. Biol Conserv 141:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vyas NB (1999) Factors influencing the estimation of pesticide-related wildlife mortality. J Toxicol Ind Health 15:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vyas NB, Spann JW, Hulse CS, Borges SL, Bennett RS, Torrez M, Williams BI, Leffel R (2006) Field evaluation of an avian risk assessment model. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1762–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vyas NB, Spann JW, Hulse CS, Gentry S, Borges SL (2007) Dermal insecticide residues from birds inhabiting an orchard. Environ Monit Assess 133:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiemeyer SN, Sparling DW (1991) Acute toxicity of four anticholinesterase insecticides to American kestrels, Eastern screech-owls and Northern bobwhites. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1139–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson L, Martin PA, Elliott JE, Mineau P, Cheng KM (2001) Exposure of California quail to organophosphorus insecticides in apple orchards in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. Ecotoxicology 10:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shannon L. Borges
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nimish B. Vyas
    • 2
  • Mary C. Christman
    • 3
  1. 1.MEES Graduate ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterBARCBeltsvilleUSA
  3. 3.MCC Statistical Consulting, LLCGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Office of Pesticide ProgramsU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations