Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 379–391 | Cite as

Shifting Lands: Exploring Kansas Farmer Decision-Making in an Era of Climate Change and Biofuels Production

  • Stacey Swearingen WhiteEmail author
  • Theresa Selfa
Article

Abstract

While farming has been the subject of frequent critical analysis with respect to its environmental impacts, including its greenhouse gas emissions, there has been relatively little consideration of the potentially positive role of agriculture in responding to a future greatly influenced by climate change. One possible realm for agriculture to contribute successfully to this future is through biofuels cultivation. This paper uses the state of Kansas as an example to examine factors that are influencing farmer decision-making during a time of heightened debates about climate and energy. Drawing on interviews with key informants and Kansas farmers, we apply and refine a conceptual model for understanding farmer decisions. We find that farmers have largely positive perceptions of the natural environment. Climate change, especially, is not a salient concern at this time. Factors that appear most likely to influence farmer decisions to adopt a new practice include the relative advantage of that practice and the ability to learn about and discuss it through existing social networks. Successful policy incentives must provide farmers with a continued sense of both independence and contribution to greater societal good.

Keywords

Farmer decision-making Agricultural change Kansas Biofuels 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR, EPS-0903806) and the University of Kansas Transportation Research Institute (KU-TRI). The authors thank Scott White and the Kansas Energy Information Network (KEIN) for assistance with our biofuels facilities map. They are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Atwell R, Schulte LA, Westphal LM (2009a) Landscape, community, countryside: linking biophysical and social scales in US Corn Belt Agricultural Landscapes. Landsc Ecol 24:791–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwell R, Schulte LA, Westphal LM (2009b) Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the U.S. corn belt. Ecol Soc 14(1):30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art30/. Accessed 26 Nov 2012
  3. Boswell MR, Greve AI, Seale TL (2012) Local climate action planning. Island Press, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton R (2004a) Reconceptualizing the ‘behavioral approach’ in agricultural studies. J Rural Stud 20:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton R (2004b) Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behavior. Sociol Rural 44(2):195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton R, Wilson GA (2006) Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? J Rural Stud 22(1):95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr S, Tait J (1991) Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications. J Environ Manag 32:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng AS, Krueger LE, Daniels S (2003) “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Soc Nat Resour 16:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cope M, McLafferty S, Rhoads BL (2011) Farmer attitudes toward production of perennial energy grasses in east central Illinois: implications for community-based decision making. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(4):852–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coughenour CM (2003) Innovating conservation agriculture: the case of no-till cropping. Rural Soc 68(2):278–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creswell J (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. Falconer K (2000) Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective. J Rural Stud 16(3):379–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field DR, Voss PR, Kuczenski TK, Hammer RB, Radeloff VC (2003) Reaffirming social landscape analysis in landscape ecology: a conceptual framework. Soc Nat Resour 16:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foltz J, Zeuli K (2005) The role of community and farm characteristics in farm input purchasing patterns. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 27(4):508–525Google Scholar
  15. Galpin CJ (1915) The social anatomy of an agricultural community. Agricultural experiment station bulletin no. 34. University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldschmidt W (1948) Down on the farm: new style. Antioch Rev 8(2):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison CM, Burgess J, Clark J (1998) Discounted knowledges: farmers’ and residents’ understandings of nature conservation goals and policies. J Environ Manag 54:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes MN, Olmstead AL (1984) Farm size and community quality: Arvin and Dinuba revisited. Am J Agric Econ 66:430–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holloway L (1999) Understanding climate change and farming: scientific and farmers’ constructions of ‘global warming’ in relation to agriculture. Environ Plan A 31(11):2017–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Institute for Policy and Social Research (2011) Kansas statistical abstract 2010. http://www.ipsr.ku.edu/ksdata/ksah/KSA45.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2012
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. International Energy Agency (2010) Sustainable production of second generation biofuels: potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. Paris (information paper)Google Scholar
  23. Jensen K et al (2007) Farmer willingness to grow switchgrass for energy production. Biomass Bioenergy 31:773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan N, Boody G, Broussard W, Glover JD, Keeney D, McCown BH, McIsaac G, Muller M, Murray H, Neal J, Pansing C, Turner RE, Warner K, Wyse D (2007) Sustainable development of the agricultural bio-economy. Science 316: 1570–1571Google Scholar
  25. Kansas Energy Information Network (2012) Ethanol and biodiesel plant activity in Kansas: November 2012. http://kansasenergy.org/biofuels.htm. Accessed 26 Nov 2012
  26. Kelsey KD, Franke TC (2009) The producers’ stake in the bioeconomy: a survey of Oklahoma producers’ knowledge and willingness to grow dedicated biofuel crops. J Ext 47(1). http://www.joe.org/joe/2009february/rb5.php. Accessed 26 Nov 2012
  27. Landis PH (1933) The growth and decline of South Dakota trade centers 1901–1933. Agricultural experiment station bulletin no. 279. South Dakota State University, BrookingsGoogle Scholar
  28. Lehrer N (2010) (Bio)fueling farm policy: the biofuels boom and the 2008 farm bill. Agric Hum Values 27:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyson TA, Welsh R (2005) Agricultural industrialization, anticorporate farming laws and rural community welfare. Eniron Plan A 37:1479–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyson TA, Torres R, Welsh R (2001) Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement and community welfare. Soc Forces 80:311–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mattison E, Norris K (2007) Intentions of UK farmers toward biofuel crop production: implications for policy targets and land use change. Environ Sci Technol 41(16):5589–5594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McEachern C (1992) Farmers and conservationists: conflict and accommodation in farming politics. J Rural Stud 8:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McHenry H (1998) Wild flowers in the wrong fields are weeds! Examining farmers’ constructions of conservation. Eniron Plan A 29:1039–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook for new methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris C (2006) Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: an analysis of UK agri-environment schemes. Geoforum 37:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Napier TL et al (2000) Adoption of conservation production systems in three midwest watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 55:123–134Google Scholar
  37. National Research Council, Committee on economic and environmental impacts of increasing biofuels production (2011) renewable fuel standard: potential economic and environmental effects of U.S. biofuels policy. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Ojima DS, Lackett JM (2002) Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Central Great Plains. U.S. Global Change Research Program. http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/gpa/gpa_report.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2011
  39. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  40. Paulrud S, Laitila T (2010) Farmers’ attitudes about growing energy crops: A choice experiment approach. Biomass Bioenergy. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.007
  41. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Hammer S, Mehrotra S (eds) (2011) Climate change and cities: first assessment report of the urban climate change research network. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossi A, Hinrichs C (2011) Hope and skepticism: farmer and local community views on the socio-economic benefits of agricultural bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 35(4):1418–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silverman D (ed) (2011) Qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  45. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala T, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels: the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271Google Scholar
  46. Tsouvalis J, Seymour S, Watkins C (2000) Exploring knowledge-cultures: precision farming, yield mapping and the expert/farmer interface. Environ Plan A 32:909–924Google Scholar
  47. Wallender S, Claasen R, Nickerson C (2011) The ethanol decade: an expansion of US corn production, 2000–09. EIB-79, USDA, Economic Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  48. Wejnert B (2002) Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Annu Rev Soc 28:297–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White SS, Brown JC, Gibson J, Hanley E, Earnhart DH (2009) Planting food or fuel: developing an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the role of culture in farmer’s decisions to grow second-generation biofuel feedstock crops. Comp Technol Transf Soc 7(3):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson G, Hart K (2001) Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: towards conservation-oriented thinking? Sociol Rural 41(2):254–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright W (2005) Fields of cultural contradiction: lessons from the tobacco patch. Agric Hum Values 22:465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban PlanningUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Studies, SUNY ESFSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations