Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Thinning Pine Plantations to Reestablish Oak Openings Species in Northwestern Ohio

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globally the area in forest plantations is rising by 2% annually, increasing the importance of plantations for production of human goods and services and for ecological functions such as carbon storage and biodiversity conservation. Specifically in the Great Lakes states and provinces of Midwestern North America, thousands of hectares of pine plantations were established in the early and mid-1900s to revegetate abandoned agricultural fields that had replaced mixed-species forests and oak–prairie ecosystems. Plantation establishment also was intended to bolster the timber base. Management priorities have shifted, with many resource managers currently seeking to manage existing plantations for promoting mixed-species ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to assess plant succession and the reestablishment of oak savanna and prairie species after thinning 14 plantations of Pinus resinosa and strobus in northwestern Ohio, USA. Thinning reduced tree basal area by an average of 75%. Plant communities were sampled on 0.05-ha plots one and 3 years after thinning and compared to 10 unthinned control plantations. By 3 years after thinning, thinned plots contained 2–3 times more species and 14 times more plant cover than control plots. The species composition of colonizing plants was most strongly correlated with residual pine basal area and soil variables related to drainage (e.g., sand concentration, available water capacity). Although plant composition was dominated by widespread colonizers such as Erechtites hieraciifolia, the coefficient of conservatism (indicative of species of more intact, undisturbed communities) significantly increased on thinned plots from year 1 to 3. This finding, coupled with the presence of four rare, state-listed Ohio species whose eight plot occurrences all were on thinned plots, suggests that plant composition is moving towards species typifying more high-quality savanna and prairie habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella SR, MacDonald NW (2002) Spatial and temporal patterns of eastern white pine regeneration in a northwestern Ohio oak stand. Michigan Botanist 41:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Abella SR, Jaeger JF, Gehring DH, Jacksy RG, Menard KS, High KA (2001) Restoring historic plant communities in the Oak Openings region of northwest Ohio. Ecological Restoration 19:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Abella SR, Jaeger JF, Schetter TA (2007) Public land acquisition and ecological restoration: an example from northwest Ohio’s Oak Openings region. Natural Areas Journal 27:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams MD (1998) The red maple paradox: what explains the widespread expansion of red maple in eastern forests? Bioscience 48:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amezaga I, Onaindia M (1997) The effect of evergreen and deciduous coniferous plantations on the field layer and seed bank of native woodlands. Ecography 20:308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreas BK, Mack JJ, McCormac JS (2004) Floristic quality assessment index (FQAI) for vascular plants and mosses for the state of Ohio. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus, OH, p 219

    Google Scholar 

  • Armesto JJ, Cheplick GP, McConnell MJ (1983) Observations on the reproductive biology of Phytolacca americana (Phytolaccaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 110:380–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigas FJ, Boerner REJ (1989) Advance regeneration and seed banking of woody plants in Ohio pine plantations: implications for landscape change. Landscape Ecology 2:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwell RC, Schulte LA, Palik BJ (2008) Songbird response to experimental retention harvesting in red pine (Pinus resinosa) forests. Forest Ecology and Management 255:3621–3631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1996) Role of temperature and light in the germination ecology of buried seeds of weedy species of disturbed forests. II. Erechtites hieracifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 74:2002–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith SL (1954) Ecological succession on abandoned farm lands and its relationship to wildlife management. Ecological Monographs 24:349–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender LC, Minnis DL, Haufler JB (1997) Wildlife responses to thinning red pine. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 14:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D (1995) The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. In: Mead DJ, Cornforth IS (eds) Proceedings of the trees and soil workshop, Lincoln University 28 February–2 March 1994. Agronomy Society of New Zealand special publication no. 10. Lincoln University Press, Canterbury, pp 1–33

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Inc., Belmont, CA, p 358

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer LG, Vankat JL (2004) Description of the vegetation of the Oak Openings of northwestern Ohio at the time of Euro-American settlement. Ohio Journal of Science 104:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer LG, Vankat JL (2006) Richness and diversity of oak savanna in northwestern Ohio: proximity to possible sources of propagules. American Midland Naturalist 155:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity Conservation 17:925–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockway DG, Gatewood RG, Paris RB (2002) Restoring grassland savannas from degraded pinyon-juniper woodlands: effects of mechanical overstory reduction and slash treatment alternatives. Journal of Environmental Management 64:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudvig LA, Asbjornsen H (2008) The removal of woody encroachment restores biophysical gradients in Midwestern oak savannas. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech coords) (1990) Silvics of North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Agricultural Handbook 654. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) (2002) Methods of soil analysis: Part 4–physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, p 1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann DI, O’Neill WJ, Caveney N (1987) Wide-spaced red pine: a multiple use opportunity. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 4:44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KJ, Boring LR, Swank WT (1998) Changes in vegetation structure after grass-to-forest succession in a southern Appalachian watershed. American Midland Naturalist 140:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore DW, Palik BJ (eds) (2006) A revised managers handbook for red pine in the North Central region. General technical report NC-264. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Saint Paul, MN, 55 pp

  • Haney A, Bowles M, Apfelbaum S, Lain E, Post T (2008) Gradient analysis of an eastern sand savanna’s woody vegetation, and its long-term responses to restored fire processes. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1560–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington CA, Roberts SD, Brodie LC (2005) Tree and understory responses to variable-density thinning in western Washington. In: Peterson CE, Maguire DA (eds) Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. Proceedings of a conference. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-635. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 97–106

  • Konen ME, Jacobs PM, Burras CL, Talaga BJ, Mason JA (2002) Equations for predicting soil organic carbon using loss-on-ignition for north central U.S. soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1878–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach MK, Givnish TJ (1999) Gradients in the composition, structure, and diversity of remnant oak savannas in southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 69:353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. User’s guide. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, p 237

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmaster SG, Bell FW, Roosenboom CR, Cole HA, Towill WD (2006) Restoration of floral diversity through plantations on abandoned agricultural land. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2009) The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA. Accessed online May 25, 2009: http://plants.usda.gov

  • Nuzzo VA (1986) Extent and status of Midwest oak savanna: presettlement and 1985. Natural Areas Journal 6:6–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Division of Natural Areas and Preserves (2008) Rare native Ohio plants: 2008–09 status list. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker WC, Elliott KA, Dey DC, Boysen E, Newmaster SG (2001) Managing succession in conifer plantations: converting young red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantations to native forest types by thinning and underplanting. Forestry Chronicle 77:721–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilon J (ed) (2006) Guidelines for red pine management based on ecosystem management principles for state forestland in Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR (2002) Effects of forest plantation management on herbaceous-layer composition and diversity. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, vol 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2004) JMP user’s guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton KE, Rawls WJ (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:1569–1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah DA, Madden LV (2004) Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data in designed factorial experiments. Phytopathology 94:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (ed) (1996) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3–chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., and American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, p 1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone KL, McConoughey EH, Bottrell GD, Crowner DJ (1980) Soil Survey of Lucas County, Ohio. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 139 pp

  • Sturgess P, Atkinson D (1993) The clear-felling of sand-dune plantations: soil and vegetational processes in habitat restoration. Biological Conservation 66:71–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink F, Wilhelm G (1979) Plants of the Chicago region. Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, p 922

    Google Scholar 

  • Tramer EJ (1975) The regulation of plant species diversity on an early successional old-field. Ecology 56:905–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winjum JK, Schroeder PE (1997) Forest plantations of the world: their extent, ecological attributes, and carbon storage. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 84:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J (2004) A 200-year fire history in a remnant oak savanna in southeastern Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 152:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I collected the 2002 data while employed by the Metropolitan Park District of the Toledo Area, which also funded the 2004 sampling. John Jaeger (retired) of the park district planned the thinning treatments and supported the post-treatment monitoring. Calvin Seymour Logging contractors (Wellston, Ohio) performed the thinning. I thank Jenny Finfera (park district) for helping to collect the 2004 data; Tim Walters for identifying plant samples; Cheryl Vanier and Cayenne Engel (University of Nevada Las Vegas) for running the repeated measures analyses of variance; and Sharon Altman (University of Nevada Las Vegas) for preparing the figures and formatting Table 2, and Beverly Collins, three anonymous reviewers, and Sharon Altman for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Public Affairs, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-4030, USA

    Scott R. Abella

Authors
  1. Scott R. Abella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott R. Abella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abella, S.R. Thinning Pine Plantations to Reestablish Oak Openings Species in Northwestern Ohio. Environmental Management 46, 391–403 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9538-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9538-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation