Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Approach for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Various Ozone Air Quality Standards for Protecting Trees

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We demonstrate an approach for evaluating the level of protection attained using a variety of forms and levels of past, current, and proposed Air Quality Standards (AQSs). The U.S. Clean Air Act requires the establishment of ambient air quality standards to protect health and public welfare. However, determination of attainment of these standards is based on ambient pollutant concentrations rather than prevention of adverse effects. To determine if a given AQS protected against adverse effects on vegetation, hourly ozone concentrations were adjusted to create exposure levels that “just attain” a given standard. These exposures were used in combination with a physiologically-based tree growth model to account for the interactions of climate and ozone. In the evaluation, we used ozone concentrations from two 6-year time periods from the San Bernardino Mountains in California. There were clear differences in the level of vegetation protection achieved with the various AQSs. Based on modeled plant growth, the most effective standards were the California 8-hr average maximum of 70 ppb and a seasonal, cumulative, concentration-weighted index (SUM06), which if attained, resulted in annual growth reductions of 1% or less. Least effective was the 1-hr maximum of 120 ppb which resulted in a 7% annual reduction. We conclude that combining climate, exposure scenarios, and a process-based plant growth simulator was a useful approach for evaluating effectiveness of current or proposed air quality standards, or evaluating the form and/or level of a standard based on preventing adverse growth effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmore MR (2005) Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant, Cell and Environment 28:949–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CARB (California Air Resources Board) 2005. Review of the ambient air quality standard for ozone. California Air Resource Board. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/ozone-rs/ozone-rs.htm

  • Chameides WL, Kasibhatla J Yienger, Levy H II (1994) Growth of continental-scale metro-agro-plexes, regional ozone pollution, and world food production. Science 264:74–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CS, Weber JA, Lee EH, Hogsett WE (1995) Accentuation of gas exchange gradients in flushes of ponderosa pine exposed to ozone. Tree Physiology 15:181–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran PH, Jennings JW, Youngberg CT (1984) Biomass estimators for thinned second-growth ponderosa pine trees. USDA-FS Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Station, Research Note PNW-415

  • Congressional Federal Register. (1997) National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Final Rule. 40 CFR Part 50. Federal Register Vol. 62 (138) Friday July 18, 1997. U.S. Congress

  • Dozier J (1980) Clear-sky spectral solar radiation model for snow-covered mountainous terrain. Water Resources Research 16:709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubayah R, Van Katwijk V (1992) The topographic distribution of annual incoming solar radiation in the Rio Grande basin. Geophysical Research Letters 19:2231–2234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth-Info (1992) National Climate Data Center summary of the day, user’s manual. Earth-Info, Inc, Boulder, Colorado

  • Emberson L, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen J-P (2000) Modelling stomatal flux across Europe. Environmental Pollutions 109:403–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn ME, Poth MA, Johnson DW (1996) Evidence for nitrogen saturation in the San Bernardino Mountains of southern California. Forest Ecology and Management 82:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer J, Skarby L, Ashmore MR (1997) Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe. Environmental Pollution 97:91–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grulke NE, Retzlaff WA (2001) Changes in physiological attributes of ponderosa pine from seedling to nature tree. Tree Physiol 21:275–286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heck WW, Cowling EB (1997) The need for a long-term cumulative secondary ozone standard - an ecological perspective. EM Journal (January): 23–33

  • Hogsett WE, Tingey DT, Lee EH (1988) Ozone exposure indices: concepts for development and evaluation of their use. In: Taylor OC, Heck WW, Tingey DT (eds), Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants: Proceedings from an International Conference. Elsevier Applied Science, New York Raleigh, NC. Pages 107-138

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogsett WE, Tingey DT, Holman SR (1985) A programmable exposure control system for determination of the effects of pollutant exposure regimes on plant growth. Atmospheric Environment 19(7):1135–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horst R, Duff M (1995) Concentration data transformation and the quadratic rollback methodology. Report to U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (Round 2, Revised). MathTech, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC

  • Hubbell BJ, Hallberg A, McCubbin DR, Post E (2005) Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone standard. Environmental Health Perspectives 113:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford RD, Nemani RR, Running SW, Coughlan JC (1989) MTCLIM: Mountain Microclimate Simulation Model. Research Paper INT-414. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, pp. 52

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendry GR, Weinstein D, Nosal M, Percy KE (2005) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant, Cell and Environment 28:965–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz M, Lathe FE (1939) Introduction. in Effect of Sulphur Dioxide on Vegetation. National Research Council of Canada, Associate Committee of Trail Smelter Smoke, N.R.C. No. 815. Ottawa, Canada. Pages 1–15

  • Kolb TE, Matyssek R (2001) Limitations and perspective about scaling ozone impacts in trees. Environmental Pollution 115:373–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krupa SV, Grühagen L, Jäger HJ, Nosal M, Manning WJ, Legge AH, Hanewald K (1995) Ambient ozone and adverse crop response: a unified view of cause and effect. Environ Pollut 87:119–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence JA, Kohut R, Amundson R (1993) Use of TREGRO to simulate effects of ozone on the growth of red spruce seedlings. Forest Science 39:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence JA, Retzlaff WA, Kern JS, Lee EH, Hogsett WE, Weinstein DA (2001) Predicting the regional impact of ozone and precipitation on the growth of loblolly pine and yellow-poplar using linked TREGRO and ZELIG models. Forest Ecology and Management 146:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EH, Tingey DT, Hogsett WE (1988) Evaluation of ozone exposure indices in exposure-response modeling. Environmental Pollution 53:43–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EH, Tingey DT, Hogsett WE, Laurence JA (2003) History of tropospheric ozone for the San Bernardino Mountains of southern California, 1963–1999. Atmospheric Environment 37(2003):2705–2717. http://wedcor.cor.epa.gov/pages/whatsnew.htm

  • Lefohn AS, Foley JK (1992) NCLAN results and their application to the standard-setting process: protecting vegetation from surface ozone exposures. J Waste Manage Assoc 42:1046–1052

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC-Y, Jacob DJ, Fiore AM (2001) Trends in exceedances of the ozone air quality standard in the continental United States, 1980–1998. Atmospheric Environment 35:3217–3228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MathTech (1995) Addendum to the regional farm model (RFM) User’s Guide Version 3.0 for personal computers. 18 pages, Memorandum to U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. Mathtech, Inc, Princeton, NJ

  • Miller PR, McBride JR (1999) Introduction. In: Miller PR, McBride JR (eds) Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 1–3

  • Miller PR, Rechel J (1999) Temporal changes in crown condition indices needle litterfall, and collateral needle injuries of Ponderosa and Jeffrey pines. In: Miller PR, McBride JR (eds) Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California. Springer, New York. Pages 164–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselman RC, Oshima RJ, Gallavan RE (1983) Significance of pollutant concentration distribution in the response of `Red Kidney’ beans to ozone. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 108(2):347–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musselman RC, Massman WJ (1999) Ozone flux to vegetation and its relationship to plant response and ambient air quality standards. Atmospheric Environment 33:65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver WW, Ryker RA (1990) Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws. 28 pages In: Burns RM and B.H. Honkala, (tech coords), Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. U.S. Forest Service, http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/Volume_1/pinus/ponderosa.htm

  • Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB (1997) Simulating ozone effects on forest productivity: Interactions among leaf-, canopy-, and stand-level processes. Ecological Applications 7:1237–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston EM, Tingey DT (1988) The NCLAN program for crop loss assessment. In: Taylor OC, Heck WW, Tingey DT (eds) Assessment of Crop Loss from Air Pollutants: Proceedings from an International Conference. Elsevier Applied Science, New York Pages 45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff WA, Weinstein D, Laurence JA, Gollands B (1996) Simulated root dynamics of a 160 yr-ol sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh) tree with and without ozone exposure using the TREGRO model. Tree Physiology 20:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff WA, Arthur MA, Grulke NE, Weinstein DA, Gollands B (2000) Use of a single tree simulation model to predict effects of ozone and drought on growth of a white fir tree. Tree Physiology 20:195–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano AT (1977) Air pollution surveys. In: Stern AC (ed) Air Pollution Volume V: Air Quality Management. Academic Press, New York. Pages 247–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson L, Kelly JM (2000) Scaling ozone effects from seedling to forest trees. Tansley Review no. 21. New Phytologist 149:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith G, Coulston J, Jepsen E, Pritchard T (2004) A national ozone biomonitoring program - Results from field surveys of ozone sensitive plants in northeastern forests (1994–2000). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 87(3):271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Hogsett WE, Lee EH, Herstrom AA, Azevedo SH (1990a) An evaluation of various alternative ambient ozone standards based on crop yield loss data. Pages 272–288 in R.L. Berglund, D.R. Lawson and D.J. McKee (eds), Tropospheric Ozone and the Environment: Papers from an International Conference. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburg

  • Tingey DT, Hogsett WE, Henderson S (1990b) Definition of adverse effects for the purpose of establishing secondary national ambient air quality standards. J Environ Qual 19:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Hogsett WE, Lee EH, Laurence JA (2004) Stricter ambient air quality standard has beneficial effect on Ponderosa pine in California. Environmental Management 34:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Laurence JA, Weber JA, Greene J, Hogsett WE, Brown S, Lee EH (2001) Elevated CO2 and temperature alter the response of Pinus ponderosa to ozone: A simulation analysis. Ecological Applications 11:1412–1424

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Taylor Jr GE (1982) Variation in plant response to ozone: a conceptual model of physiological events. In: Unsworth MH, Ormrod DP (eds) Effects of Gaesous Air Pollution in Agriculture and Horticulture. Butterworth Scientific, London. Pages 113–138

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1990) Clean Air Act Ammendments. Public Law 101–549-Nov. 15, 1990. 101st Congress

  • U.S. EPA (1996a) Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants Vol II. EPA/600/P-93?004bF. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C

  • U.S. EPA (1996b) Staff Paper: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. Assesment of Scientific and Technical Information. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  • U.S. EPA (2006a) Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development. National Center for Environmental Assessment

  • U.S. EPA (2006b) Technology Transfer Network: Air Quality System (AQS). Environmental Protection Agency

  • Weber JA, Clark CS, Hogsett WE (1993) Analysis of the relationships among O3 uptake, conductance, and photosynthesis in needles of Pinus ponderosa. Tree Physiology 13:157–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein DA, Beloin R (1990) Evaluating effects of pollutants on integrated tree processes: A model of carbon, water and nutrient balances. In: Dixon RK, Medldahl RS, Ruark GA, Warren WG (eds), Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Timber Press, Portland Oregon. Pages 313–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein DA, Yanai RD (1994) Integrating the effects of simultaneous multiple stresses on plants using the simulation model TREGRO. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:418–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein DA, Beloin RM, Yani RD (1991) Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stresses. Tree Physiology 9:127–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein DA, Laurence JA, Retzlaff WA, Kern JS, Lee EH, Hogsett WE, Weber J (2005) Predicting the effects of tropospheric ozone on regional productivity of ponderosa pine and white fir. Forest Ecology and Management 205:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun S-C, Laurence JA (1999) The response of sensitive and tolerant clones of Populus tremuloides to dynamic ozone exposure under controlled environmental conditions. New Phytologist 143:305–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has supported the research described in this paper. The research has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Environmental and Health Effects Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, Oregon, 97333, USA

    William E. Hogsett, David T. Tingey, E. Henry Lee, Peter A. Beedlow & Christian P. Andersen

Authors
  1. William E. Hogsett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David T. Tingey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Henry Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter A. Beedlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian P. Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Hogsett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogsett, W.E., Tingey, D.T., Lee, E.H. et al. An Approach for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Various Ozone Air Quality Standards for Protecting Trees. Environmental Management 41, 937–948 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9057-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9057-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation