Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Brief Overview of Carbon Sequestration Economics and Policy

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the issues and challenges involved in analyzing the costs and program design for carbon sequestration. The first section examines some of the pitfalls of comparing the results of carbon sequestration cost studies and suggests some simple ways in which analysts could make their results more useful. The pitfalls in comparing studies include different definitions for the summary statistic “dollars per ton,” differences in the type of costs that are estimated, and differences in underlying assumptions regarding program design and implementation. Future cost studies will benefit from improved treatment of leakage, general equilibrium interactions, and public finance interactions. The second section reviews issues related to the implementation of a carbon sequestration program, including which policy tools are available and which have received the most attention, some of the challenges for using those policy tools, and one alternative that has received little attention, but may become necessary. The discussion also provides an overview and analysis of the bills introduced in the last two congresses and considers the general policy implications of those proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Fig. 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. R. Adams D. Adams J. Callaway C. Chang B. McCarl (1993) ArticleTitleSequestering carbon on agricultural land: Social cost and impacts on timber markets Contemporary Policy Issues XI(1 76–87

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Adams R. Alig B. McCarl J. Callaway S. Winnett (1999) ArticleTitleMinimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests Land Economics 75(3) 360–374

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl (1998) ArticleTitleEcological and economic impacts of forest policies: Interactions across forestry and agriculture Ecological Economics 27(1998) 63–78 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00129-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Alig D. Adams B. McCarl J.M. Callaway S. Winnett (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors Environmental and Resource Economics 9 259–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026409105660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Andersson K. Richards (2001) ArticleTitleImplementing an international carbon sequestration program: Can the leaky sink be fixed Climate Policy 1(2001) 173–188 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1469-3062(01)00004-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antle, J., S. Capalbo, S. Mooney, E. Elliott, and K. Paustian. 2002. Spatial heterogenity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture. Draft paper available from authors.

  7. Aukland, L., P. Moura Costa, S. Brown. 2001. A conceptual framework for addressing leakage on avoided deforestation projects. At Available from www.ecosecurities.com/download/Aukland M Costa+S Brown Leakage.pdf.)

  8. D. Cole P. Grossman (1999) ArticleTitleWhen is command-and-control efficient? Institutions, technology, and the comparative efficiency of alternative regimes for environmental protection Wisconsin Law Review 1999 887–938

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Dudek A. LeBlanc (1990) ArticleTitleOffsetting new CO2 emissions: A rational first greenhouse policy step Contemporary Policy Issues 8 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goulder, L. 1994. Environmental taxation and the “double dividend”: A reader’s guide. Paper prepared for the International Institute of Public Finance 50th Congress, “Public Finance, Environment, and Natural Resources.”

  11. L. Goulder I. Parry D. Burtraw (1997) ArticleTitleRevenue-raising versus other approaches to environmental protection: The critical significance of preexisting tax distortions RAND Journal of Economics 28(4) 708–731

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Goulder I. Parry R. Williams SuffixIII D. Burtraw (1998) The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting Resources for the Future Working Paper Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kerr, S., S. Brown, J. Hendy, S Liu, A. Pfaff, and A. Sanchez. 2003a. Tropical forest protection, uncertainty, and the environmental integrity of carbon mitigation policies. Draft paper available from authors.

  14. Kerr, S., A. Pfaff, and G. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2003b. Development and deforestation: Evidence from Costa Rica. Draft paper available from authors.

  15. Lal, R., J. M. Kimble, R. F. Follett, and C. V. Cole. 1998. The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Sleeping Bear Press.

  16. S. Matthews R. O’Connor A. Plantinga (2002) ArticleTitleQuantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests Ecological Economics. 40(1) 71–87 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00269-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarl, B., B. Murray, and U. Schneider. 2001. Jointly estimating carbon sequestration supply from forests and agriculture. Paper prepared for Western Economics Association Meetings.

  18. R. Moulton K. Richards (1990) Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. General Technical Report WO-58 US Department of Agriculture Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murray, B., B. McCarl, and H. Lee. 2003. Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. Land Economics.

  20. InstitutionalAuthorNameNew York State Energy Office (1991) Analysis of carbon reduction in New York State. Report of the New York State Energy Office, in consultation with NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and NYS Department of Public Service NYS Energy Office Albany, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Newell R. Stavins (2000) ArticleTitleClimate change and forest sinks: Factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40(3) 211–235 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1999.1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Nordhaus J Boyer (2000) Warming the world: Economic models of global warming MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Parry (1995a) ArticleTitlePollution taxes and revenue recycling Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 S64–S77 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1995.1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Parry (1995b) ArticleTitleOptimal pollution taxes and endogenous technological progress Resource and Energy Economics 17 69–85 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0928-7655(94)00010-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. I. Parry (1997a) ArticleTitleEnvironmental taxes and quotas in the presence of distorting taxes in factor markets Resource and Energy Economics 19 203–220 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0928-7655(96)00012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. I. Parry (1997b) ArticleTitleReducing carbon emissions: Interactions with the tax system raise the cost Resources for the Future 128 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Parry (1998) ArticleTitleA second-best analysis of environmental subsidies International Tax and Public Finance 5 153–170 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008638320593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfaff, A. 2003. What would have happened? Reviewing and improving estimated baselines for tropical forests and sequestered carbon. Draft paper available from authors.

  29. Plantinga, A. and T. Mauldin. 2000. A method for estimating the cost of CO2 mitigation through afforestation. Draft paper available from authors.

  30. A. Plantinga T. Mauldin D. Miller (1999) ArticleTitleAn econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4) 812–824

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Plantinga J. Wu (2003) ArticleTitleCo-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: An evaluation of the reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin Land Economics 79(1) 74–85

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richards, K. 1997a. Estimating costs of carbon sequestration for a United States greenhouse gas policy. Report prepared for Charles River Associates.

  33. K. Richards (1997b) ArticleTitleThe time value of carbon in bottom-up studies Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27 S279–S292 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvVOjtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Richards (2000) ArticleTitleFraming environmental policy instrument choice Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum X 221–285

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Richards K. Andersson (2001) ArticleTitleThe leaky sink: Persistent obstacles to a forest carbon sequestration program based on individual projects Climate Policy I(2001) 41–54 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1469-3062(00)00003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Richards, K., and C. Stokes. 2003. A review of carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen years of research. Climatic Change in press.

  37. K. Richards R. Moulton R. Birdsey (1993) ArticleTitleCosts of creating carbon sinks in the U.S Energy Conservation and Management 34(9–11) 905–912 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0196-8904(93)90035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Sappington J. Stiglitz (1986) ArticleTitlePrivatization, information, and incentives Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6 567–581

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sedjo, R., and A. Solomon. 1989. In P. Crosson, J. Darmstadter, W. Easterling, and N. Rosenberg (eds.). Greenhouse warming: Abatement and adaptation. RFF Proceedings, pp. 110–119.

  40. Sedjo, R., B. Sohngen, and R. Mendelsohn. 2001. Estimating carbon supply curves for global forests and other land uses. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 01–19, Washington DC.

  41. B. Sohngen R. Mendelsohn (2001) ArticleTitleOptimal forest carbon sequestration American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2) 448–457

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. Stavins (1999) ArticleTitleThe costs of carbon sequestration: A revealed-preference approach American Economic Review 89 994–1009

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. van Kooten L. Arthur W. Wilson (1992) ArticleTitlePotential to sequester carbon in Canadian forests: Some economic considerations Canadian Public Policy XVIII(2) 127–138

    Google Scholar 

  44. O. Williamson (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism The Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA

    Kenneth R. Richards

Authors
  1. Kenneth R. Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, K. A Brief Overview of Carbon Sequestration Economics and Policy. Environmental Management 33, 545–558 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9111-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9111-8

Search

Navigation