Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Treatment of Alar Base Depression in Rhinoplasty with Diced Autologous Cartilage or Mass Cartilage: A Systematic Review

  • Review
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Alar base is the basal part where the two sides of the nose and the upper lip are connected. Alar base depression affects the overall facial contour by making the nasolabial folds deepen, the nasolabial angle smaller, the center of the face flat, etc. Despite the rapid development of rhinoplasty, controversy still exists regarding the treatment of alar base depression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two prevalent techniques—diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage—for addressing alar base depression.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching the literature published in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, Cochrane from January 2000 to April 2023 with the key words ‘alar base depression or depressed alar base’ and ‘alar base augmentation,’ and 2 investigators independently screened the retrieved literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 269 articles were obtained through database search. After removing duplicates, reading titles and abstracts, and finally reviewing the full text, 6 articles were included in the final study, including 165 patients.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that both diced autologous cartilage and mass cartilage techniques exhibit favorable outcomes in correcting alar base depression. Diced autologous cartilage offers better malleability, lighter border contours, and a more natural appearance. On the other hand, diced autologous cartilage seems to offer superior long-term effects, while mass cartilage presents certain surgical procedural advantages. Also, compared to diced cartilage, mass cartilage may have a lower rate of long-term resorption and a lower risk of displacement. This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment selection based on individual patient characteristics.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang Y, Wang X (2021) Application of diced autologous rib cartilage for paranasal augmentation in cleft nose. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(3):1169–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02036-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponsky D, Guyuron B (2010) Alar base disharmonies. Clin Plast Surg 37(2):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orlando GJ, Marquez E (2019) Alar rim reconstruction with autologous graft cartilage: external approach. J Craniofac Surg 30(3):868–870. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore MLG, Nguyen TC, Day KM, Weinfeld AB (2020) Pyriform costal cartilage graft improves cleft-side alar asymmetry in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 57(5):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665619882558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. An Y, Zhen Y, Ye W, Cui Y, Dang W, Zhao J, Xie L, Li D (2021) Diced costal cartilage graft combined with muscle repositioning improves cleft-side alar asymmetry in Asian secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty: a three-dimensional evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 74(9):2265–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong W, Xu Y, Han R, Zheng R, Fan F (2022) Paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage for midface concavity: a retrospective study of 68 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(2):795–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02593-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Ma WS, Bai JP, Li XX, Li HD, Zhu T, Sun JY, Ge HG, Pang Y, Xue F, Cheng LY, Jin R, Zhang Y, Sun XM, Zhang YG (2019) Comprehensive application of autologous costal cartilage grafts in rhino- and mentoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 30(7):2174–2177. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yen CI, Chen RF, Zelken J, Chang CS, Yang SY, Chen HC, Chang SY, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Hsiao YC (2018) The influence of paranasal augmentation on the measurement of the nose for the treatment of midfacial concavity. Aesthet Surg J 38(3):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erol OO (2017) Injection of compressed diced cartilage in the correction of secondary and primary rhinoplasty: a new technique with 12 years’ experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):673e–685e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamani VR, Ghosh S, Tirunagari S (2016) Nasal correction in nasomaxillary hypoplasia (Binder’s syndrome): an optimised classification and treatment. Indian J Plast Surg 49(3):314–321. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.197237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss RO 2nd, Ong AA, Reddy LV, Bahmanyar S, Vincent AG, Ducic Y (2021) Orthognathic surgery-LeFort I osteotomy. Fac Plast Surg 37(6):703–708. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohluli B, Moharamnejad N, Yamani A (2012) Nasal base surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 24(1):87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2011.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin SI, Hsiao YC, Chang CS, Chen PK, Chen JP, Ueng SH (2016) Histology and long-term stability of diced cartilage graft for revision rhinoplasty in a cleft patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(6):e763. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee TY, Chung HY, Dhong ES, Jeong SH, Han SK (2019) Paranasal augmentation using multi-folded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) in the east asian nose. Aesthet Surg J 39(12):1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsieh TY, Dhir K, Binder WJ, Hilger PA (2021) Alloplastic facial implants. Fac Plast Surg 37(6):741–750. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JH, Jung MS, Lee BH, Jeong HS, Suh IS, Ahn DK (2016) Silicone implant-based paranasal augmentation for mild midface concavity. Arch Craniofac Surg 17(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwaiger M, Echlin K, Atherton D, Haers P (2019) The use of Medpor implants for midface contouring in cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(9):1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ (1997) Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(5):1336–1353. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199710000-00043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JH, Kim JW, Kim SJ (2016) Midfacial soft-tissue changes after paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene. Facial Plast Surg 32(2):232–237. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniel RK, Calvert JW (2004) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):2156–2171. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122544.87086.b9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Winter E, Glauser G, Caplan IF et al (2020) The LACE+ index as a predictor of 30-day patient outcomes in a plastic surgery population: a coarsened exact match study. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(3):296e–305e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guarro G, Cozzani F, Rossini M, Bonati E, Del Rio P (2021) The modified TIME-H scoring system, a versatile tool in wound management practice: a preliminary report. Acta Biomed 92(4):e2021226. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i4.10666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Guarro G, Cozzani F, Rossini M, Bonati E, Del Rio P (2021) Wounds morphologic assessment: application and reproducibility of a virtual measuring system, pilot study. Acta Biomed 92(5):e2021227. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i5.11179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nanda V, Gutman B, Bar E et al (2015) Quantitative analysis of 3-dimensional facial soft tissue photographic images: technical methods and clinical application. Prog Orthod 16:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0082-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rhee SC, Dhong ES, Yoon ES (2009) Photogrammetric facial analysis of attractive Korean entertainers. Aesthet Plast Surg 33(2):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9257-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammond P (2007) The use of 3D face shape modelling in dysmorphology. Arch Dis Child 92(12):1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.103507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtsmeier JT (2005) Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 138A(3):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.30959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel A, Islam SM, Murray K, Goonewardene MS (2015) Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging. Prog Orthod 16:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0106-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bashir MM, Sohail M, Khan FA, Jan SN, Ansari HH, Nazir U, Hidayat Z (2017) A modified suction-assisted technique of transfer of diced cartilage graft to carrier material and outcome of direct injection of unwrapped diced cartilage in rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 28(4):924–927. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Toriumi DM (2015) Discussion: combined use of crushed cartilage and fibrin sealant for radix augmentation in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):301e–302e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to give our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xingyu Xiang and Shuyuan Wang have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China

    Xingyu Xiang, Xiancheng Wang & Shuyuan Wang

Authors
  1. Xingyu Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiancheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuyuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiancheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this review.

Inform Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, X., Wang, X. & Wang, S. The Treatment of Alar Base Depression in Rhinoplasty with Diced Autologous Cartilage or Mass Cartilage: A Systematic Review. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04008-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04008-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation