Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Round Autoprosthesis: Use of Adipodermaglandular Flap in T Scar Mastopexy

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study focuses on the use of round or anatomically shaped breast autoprosthesis with different volumes prepared from the central and lower poles of the breast. The technical details and surgical outcomes for patients with varying degrees of breast ptosis are discussed.

Material and Method

This study involved 42 patients who underwent the Wise-pattern superior pedicle mastopexy procedure using the adipodermaglandular island flap technique. The research spanned from December 2017 to August 2022. The study participants had not previously undergone breast surgery, did not desire breast implants, and exhibited grade 2 and 3 breast ptosis according to the Regnault Classification. Age and preoperative breast measurements of the patients were recorded for subsequent analysis. Measurements, such as the distance from the nipple–areolar complex to the inframammary fold and the distance from the suprasternal notch to the nipple–areolar complex, were taken both before the surgery and one year after. A systematic process was followed to identify acute and subacute complications during the postoperative follow-up period.

Results

This study involved 42 patients with a mean age of 33.9 years (range: 23–49 years). These procedures were conducted between December 2017 and August 2022. The average SN-N distance before surgery measured 26.7 cm (range: 24–33 cm). One year after surgery, the average SN-N distance was 23.1 cm (range: 21.3–24.8 cm). The follow-up duration for the examined cases ranged from 12 to 18 months on average. Among the observed cases, delayed wound healing was noted in one instance, venous insufficiency of the nipple in another, and fat necrosis in a third case. The overall complication rate in the group was determined to be 7.1%.

Conclusion

In our study, the detachment of dermal connections at the level of the inframammary fold (IMF) and the smooth advancement of the flap in the form of an “island flap” made a contribution to upper pole fullness. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the fusion of the medial and lateral ends of the flap will enhance tissue integration during the healing process, promoting compatibility between the autoprosthesis tissue and breast tissue. Regarding the rates of complications described, classic mastopexy techniques have exhibited similar rates in our findings.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2020) Plastic surgery statistics report

  2. Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond DC, O’Connor EA (2014) The lower ısland flap transposition (LIFT) technique for control of the upper pole in circumvertical mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:655–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf RM, Mansur AE, Tenius FP, Ono MC, Romano GG, Cruz GA (2008) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: extended chest wall-based flap associated with a loop of pectoralis muscle. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:371–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel M (1995) Mammaplasty with pectoral muscle flap. Paper presented at: 64th annual ASPRS/PSEF/ASMS scientific meeting Montreal, Quebec

  6. Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis: Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lassus C (1987) Breast reduction: evolution of a technique—a single vertical scar. Aesth Plast Surg 11:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lejour M (1993) Vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:985–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchac D, de Olarte G (1982) Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayman MS (1998) Short scar mastopexy with flap transposition. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de la Plaza R, Cruz L (2005) Moreno mastopexy utilizing a dermoglandular hammock flap. Aesthetic Surg J 25:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hönig F, Frey HP, Hasse FM, Hasselberg J (2009) Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle. Aesthet Plast Surg. 33(3):302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanniec K, Adams WP (2019) The tissue-based triad in augmentation mastopexy: single-stage technical refinements. Aesthet Surg J 39(12):1331–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qureshi AA, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM (2018) Mastopexy and mastopexy-augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 38(4):374–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Altınel D, Serin M, Toplu G (2022) Comparison of classic mastopexy method with double-pedicled auto augmentation mastopexy with conic-shaped modified ınferior butterfly flap. Aesthetic Plast Sur 46:1641–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ors S (2018) Augmentation mastopexy with a dermal encapsulated round or anatomic autoprosthesis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42:88–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaussinger M, Wenny R, Huemer GM (2022) Auto-augmentation mastopexy: inferiorly based parenchymal flap technique and evaluation of outcomes using BREAST-Q After 151 consecutive patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(6):2723–2732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf R, Tolazzi AR, Balbinot P, Pazio A, Valente PM, Freitas RS (2016) Influence of the pectoralis major muscle sling in chest wall-based flap suspension after vertical mammaplasty: ten-year follow-up. Aesthetic Surg J 36(10):1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mangialardi ML, Ozil C, Lepage C (2021) One-stage mastopexy–lipofilling in cosmetic breast surgery: a prospective study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 45(5):1975–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Watfa W, Zaugg P, Baudoin J, Bramhall RJ, Raffoul W, di Summa PG (2019) Dermal triangular flaps to prevent pseudoptosis in mastopexy surgery: the hammock technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(11):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Atiyeh B, Ghieh F, Chahine F, Oneisi A (2022) Ptosis and bottoming out following mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Is syn-thetic mesh internal breast support the solution? A systematic review of the literature. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams WP, Moses AC (2017) Use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh to optimize soft-tissue support in mastopexy: a single-site study. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):67–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthet Plast Surg. 32(5):757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Persichetti P, Simone P, Palazzolo D, Carusi C (2012) Reduction of the opposite breast in patients with a breast reconstructed with an implant: validity of the inverted “t”, superior pedicle technique, with an inferiorly-based dermal adipose flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46(5):339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kemaloglu CA, Özocak H (2018) Comparative outcomes of inferior pedicle and superomedial pedicle technique with wise pattern reduction in gigantomastic patients. Ann Plast Surg 80(3):217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpay Duran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration by obtaining informed consent from the subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary File 1 (MOV 200615 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duran, A., Cortuk, O. & Eroglu, S. Round Autoprosthesis: Use of Adipodermaglandular Flap in T Scar Mastopexy. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03909-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03909-2

Keywords

Navigation