Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting Risk of Infection After Rhinoplasty with Autogenous Costal Cartilage: A Cohort Study

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The study was aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict risk of postoperative infection after costal cartilage-based rhinoplasty

Methods

The primary cohort of this study consisted of 672 patients who were appraised between October 2018 and December 2020. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used for data reduction and selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the predicting model. The calibration curve and C-index were used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram, while DCA was used to assess the clinical value. Internal validation was evaluated and an independent validation cohort contained 118 consecutive patients from January 2021 to June 2021.

Results

Twenty-one features were reduced to 10 potential predictors on the basis of 672 patients in the primary cohort using LASSO regression. Thus, the predictive nomogram finally contained ten clinical features-age, number of nose operations, length of hospital stay, operation time, history of nose trauma, history of animal contact after operation, smoking after operation in one month, drinking after operation in one month, history of nose infection, and spicy food after operation in one month with the most essential factor. The model showed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.987 (95% CI, 0.978–0.996) (internal validation of 0.967) and good calibration. In addition, the model also had the highest sensitivity due to the AUC of the model was 0.987. Application of the nomogram in the validation cohort still gave good discrimination (C-index, 0.935 [95% CI, 0.910–0.960]). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically helpful.

Conclusion

This is the first study to develop a nomogram to predict infection after rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Use of this nomogram might help surgeons with early identification of patients at high risk of infection.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jang YJ, Alfanta EM (2014) Rhinoplasty in the Asian nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 22:357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Won TB, Jin HR (2010) Revision rhinoplasty in Asians. Ann Plast Surg 65:379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Varadharajan K, Sethukumar P, Anwar M, Patel K (2015) Complications associated with the use of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 35:644–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park JH, Jin HR (2012) Use of autologous costal cartilage in Asian rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1338–1348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toriumi DM, Pero CD (2010) Asian rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 37:335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DW, Shah AR, Toriumi DM (2006) Concentric and eccentric carved costal cartilage: a comparison of warping. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wee JH, Park MH, Oh S, Jin HR (2015) Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg 102:148–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP (2015) Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 16:e173-180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE (2007) Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: the Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited. Crit Care Med 35:2052–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB (2004) Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med 23:2109–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M (2008) Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bateman N, Jones NS (2000) Retrospective review of augmentation rhinoplasties using autologous cartilage grafts. J Laryngol Otol 114:514–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cervelli V, Bottini DJ, Gentile P et al (2006) Reconstruction of the nasal dorsum with autologous rib cartilage. Ann Plast Surg 56:256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Won TB, Jin HR (2012) Immediate reconstruction with autologous cartilage after removal of infected alloplast in revision rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147:1054–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei L, Champman S, Li X et al (2017) Beliefs about medicines and non-adherence in patients with stroke, diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study in China. BMJ Open 7:e017293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu SC, Qi X, Hu YH, Zheng WJ, Wang QQ, Yao HY (2019) [Overview of multivariate regression model analysis and application]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 53: 334–336

  20. Chen Z, Chen J, Collins R et al (2011) China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5 million people: survey methods, baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up. Int J Epidemiol 40:1652–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Z, Lee L, Chen J et al (2005) Cohort profile: the kadoorie study of chronic disease in China (KSCDC). Int J Epidemiol 34:1243–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi CW, Choi JW, Park KC, Youn SW (2013) Facial sebum affects the development of acne, especially the distribution of inflammatory acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27:301–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Two AM, Wu W, Gallo RL, Hata TR (2015) Rosacea: part I. Introduction, categorization, histology, pathogenesis, and risk factors. J Am Acad Dermatol 72:749–758 (Quiz 759–760)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roosterman D, Goerge T, Schneider SW, Bunnett NW, Steinhoff M (2006) Neuronal control of skin function: the skin as a neuroimmunoendocrine organ. Physiol Rev 86:1309–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cichewicz RH, Thorpe PA (1996) The antimicrobial properties of chile peppers (Capsicum species) and their uses in Mayan medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 52:61–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bromham L, Skeels A, Schneemann H, Dinnage R, Hua X (2021) There is little evidence that spicy food in hot countries is an adaptation to reducing infection risk. Nat Hum Behav 5:878–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao C, Wang X, Mao Y et al (2021) Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and lifestyles. J Cosmet Dermatol 20:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciszek A (2017) Variability of skin pH after the use of different collagen gels. J Cosmet Dermatol 16:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Ohmagari N, Kanemoto H, Mizuno T (2012) Risk factor of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 36:2888–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gallo O, Locatello LG, Larotonda G, Napoleone V, Cannavicci A (2018) Nomograms for prediction of postoperative complications in open partial laryngeal surgery. J Surg Oncol 118:1050–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lubelski D, Feghali J, Ehresman J et al (2021) Web-based calculator predicts surgical-site infection after thoracolumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg 151:e571–e578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang C, Huang HZ, He Y et al (2020) A new nomogram based on early postoperative NLR for predicting infectious complications after gastrectomy. Cancer Manag Res 12:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cloarec A, Rivault C, Fontaine F, Le Guyader A (1992) Cockroaches as carriers of bacteria in multi-family dwellings. Epidemiol Infect 109:483–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mezzatesta ML, Gona F, Stefani S (2012) Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 7:887–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval and informed consent requirement were obtained for this cohort analysis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1421 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Dong, W., Wang, H. et al. Predicting Risk of Infection After Rhinoplasty with Autogenous Costal Cartilage: A Cohort Study. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 1797–1805 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02704-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02704-7

Keywords

Navigation