Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Invited Discussion on: Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction–Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications

  • Editor’s Invited Discussion
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gao P, Bai P, Ren Y et al (2021) Biological matrix-assisted one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes and complications. Aesth Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02509-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salzberg CA (2012) Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):95S-103S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahabedian MY (2012) Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(Suppl. 2):44S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahabedian MY (2010) Mastectomy, nipple areolar preservation, and immediate implant reconstruction: are total and partial muscle coverage techniques aesthetically equivalent? Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):319e–320e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J et al (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:403e

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No assistance (financial or otherwise) was obtained in preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Plastic Surgery, 7601 Lewinsville Dr., 400, McLean, VA, 22102, USA

    Maurice Y. Nahabedian

Authors
  1. Maurice Y. Nahabedian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurice Y. Nahabedian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Nahabedian is a consultant for Allergan/AbbVie (Irvine, CA) and Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI).

Human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nahabedian, M.Y. Invited Discussion on: Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction–Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 2591–2592 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02524-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02524-9

Search

Navigation