Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vertical Mammaplasty with Retromammary En Bloc Breast Suspension

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In a vertical mammaplasty, various types of pedicles have been proposed for the nipple-areola transposition. The preparation of any type of nipple-areola flap necessitates disconnecting the nipple-areola from the breast gland, except for the pedicle bearing glandular part. These flap-dependent techniques not only impair the functions of the breast but also do not provide enough fullness to the upper pole.

Method

No specific nipple-areola flap preparation is made. Reduction is obtained by a transverse excision from the lowermost part of the breast gland. Apart from this, no cut into the gland is needed. Liposuction, wide skin elevation and extended retromammary dissection permit the en bloc suspension of the breast.

Patients and Results

The study enrolled a total of 85 patients with 170 breasts. Mastopexy or minor reduction less than 100 gr was applied for 49 breasts; moderate reduction, 100–399 gr, for 67 breasts; and a large reduction of more than 400 gr for 54 breasts. No complete or incomplete nipple-areola necrosis was seen. The success rate for achieving upper pole fullness was compared between groups for reduction amount, age and body mass index (BMI).

Conclusion

The functions of the breast organ are preserved in the en bloc suspension technique. In patients with dense breasts, a good upper pole fullness was achieved with a high success rate. Young patients and patients with a body mass index below 25 are suitable for this technique. However, the same success rate could not be achieved in elderly patients with fatty breasts.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asplund O, Davies DM (1996) Vertical scar breast reduction with medial flap or glandular transposition of the nipple areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:507–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:748–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CM, White C, Warren SM, Cole J, Isik FF (2004) Simplifying the vertical reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lista F, Ahmad J (2006) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: a 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2152–2165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lista F, Austin RE, Singh Y, Ahmad J (2015) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:23–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Palumbo SK, Shifren J, Rhee C (1998) Modifications of the Lejour vertical mammaplasty: analysis of results in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 40:354–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Van de Sijpe KA, Van Landuyt KH, Thiessen FE, Monstrey SJ (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56:348–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond DC (1999) Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:890–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan UD (2007) Vertical scar with the bipedicle technique: a modified procedure for breast reduction and mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Datta G, Carlucci S (2009) Selective breast reduction: a personal approach with a central-superior pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin KS, Chung S, Lee HK, Lew JD (1996) Reduction mammaplasty by central pedicle flap with short submammary scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagerty RC, Nowicky DJ (1998) Integration of the central mound technique with the vertical skin takeout reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1182–1187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YS, Hwang K, Kim JH, Kim TH, Kim HM (2017) Central pedicle reduction mammaplasty with a vertical scar: a technical modification. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 51:436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leone MS, Franchelli S, Berrino P, Santi PL (1997) Vertical mammaplasty: a personal approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 21:356–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Würinger E (1999) Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1400–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR (2008) The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S (2009) Septum-based mammaplasty: a surgical technique based on Würinger’s septum for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:443–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bayramiçli M (2012) The central pillar technique: a new septum-based pedicle design for reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 32:578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gulyás G (1996) Combination of the vertical and periareolar mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mottura AA (2003) Circumvertical reduction mastoplasty: new considerations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Atiyeh BS, Rubeiz MT, Hayek SN (2005) Refinements of vertical scar mammaplasty: circumvertical skin excision design with limited inferior pole subdermal undermining and liposculpture of the inframammary crease. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1486–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammond DC, Loffredo M (2012) Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:829e–839e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maliniac JW (1943) Arterial blood supply of the breast: revised anatomic data relating to reconstructive surgery. Arch Surg 47:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Deventer PV (2004) The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. mon O’Dey D, Prescher A, Pallua N (2007) Vascular reliability of nipple-areola complex–bearing pedicles: an anatomical microdissection study. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1167–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Deventer PV, Graewe FR (2016) The blood supply of the breast revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1388–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Palmer JH, Taylor GI (1986) The vascular territories of the anterior chest wall. Br J Plast Surg 39:287–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarhadi NS, Dunn JS, Lee FD, Soutar DS (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J (2000) The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarhadi NS, Soutar DS (1997) Nerve supply of the nipple: only from the fourth or from several intercostal nerves? Eur J Plast Surg 20:209–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R (2005) Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ribeiro L, Accorsi JA, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:960–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Graf R, Ricardo Dall Oglio Tolazzi A, Balbinot P, Pazio A, Miguel Valente P, da Silva Freitas R (2016) Influence of the pectoralis major muscle sling in chest wall-based flap suspension after vertical mammaplasty: ten-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 36:1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H (2012) The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W292–W295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN (2006) A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:732–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, Brandt KR, Wang A, Janney C, Fredericksen ZS, Cerhan JR, Vachon CM (2008) Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol 167:1027–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuran I, Tumerdem B (2007) Vertical reduction mammaplasty: preventing skin redundancy at the vertical scar in women with large breasts or poor skin elasticity. Aesthet Surg J 27:336–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would especially like to thank his assistants, nurse Ebru Yavuz, for her help in the operations of the patients, biologist Betül Karöz, for her help in collecting and processing data from patients’ files, and graphic designer Gülşah Ertekin for taking photos of the patients and for her contribution to the drawings in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. İzmir, 35220, Turkey

    Ahmet Seyhan

Authors
  1. Ahmet Seyhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Seyhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Informed Consent

All patients signed informed consent for surgery and pictures for academic and study purposes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 19744 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (WMV 68330 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (WMV 67002 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyhan, A. Vertical Mammaplasty with Retromammary En Bloc Breast Suspension. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 78–91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01862-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01862-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation