Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Characteristics of Asymmetric Bilateral Gynecomastia: Suggestion of Desirable Surgical Method Based on a Single-Institution Experience

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia (ABGM) is uncommon, and reports on its characteristics are rare. In the present study, we investigated the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment of ABGM.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 1159 patients with gynecomastia who underwent subcutaneous mastectomy with liposuction at Damsoyu Hospital from January 2014 to February 2016. We then analyzed differences in the characteristics and operative results between two groups of patients: those with asymmetric and symmetric gynecomastia. Asymmetric gynecomastia was defined as gynecomastia meeting both of the following criteria: (1) upon physical examination, the size of the palpable mass below the nipple–areolar complex was twice as large as the smaller one, and (2) upon ultrasonography, the depth of the glandular tissue under the nipple-areolar complex was twice as large as the smaller one.

Results

Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with asymmetric gynecomastia. Among them, 51 had ABGM and three had unilateral gynecomastia. In the asymmetric group, more patients had a larger left than right breast (33 patients, 64.7%). The incidence of true-type (entirely glandular) breasts was significantly higher in the asymmetric group (84.3%) than in the symmetric group (p < 0.001). The asymmetry ratios in the asymmetric and symmetric groups were 1.87 ± 2.07 and 0.20 ± 0.16, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Bilateral mastectomy provided an acceptable and symmetric cosmetic outcome in patients with ABGM.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braunstein GD (2007) Clinical practice. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 357:1229–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Narula HS, Carlson HE (2014) Gynaecomastia–pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:684–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009) Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Mayo Clin Proc 84:1010–1015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiesman IM, Lehman JA Jr, Parker MG, Tantri MD, Wagner DS, Pedersen JC (2004) Gynecomastia: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 53:97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rew L, Young C, Harrison T, Caridi R (2015) A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men. J Adolesc 43:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kayar R, Çilengiroğlu OV (2015) Breast volume asymmetry value, ratio, and cancer risk. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 9:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH (2017) The characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41:1011–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanitis S, Starren E, Read J, Heymann T, Tekkis P, Hadjiminas DJ, Al Mufti R (2008) Surgical management of gynaecomastia: outcomes from our experience. Breast 17:596–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hands LJ, Greenall MJ (1991) Gynaecomastia. Br J Surg 78:907–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bannayan GA, Hajdu SI (1972) Gynecomastia: clinicopathologic study of 351 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 57:431–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Narula HS, Carlson HE (2007) Gynecomastia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 36:497–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cordova A, Moschella F (2008) Algorithm for clinical evaluation and surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaptanis S, Parvanta L, Beltran L (2014) Testicular seminoma presenting as unilateral gynecomastia. Breast J 20:424–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrando J, Grimalt R, Alsina M, Bulla F, Manasievska E (2002) Unilateral gynecomastia induced by treatment with 1 mg of oral finasteride. Arch Dermatol 138:543–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Qattan M, Hassanain J, Mahmoud S, El-Shayeb A, Tashkandi M, Al-Kattan WM (2005) On the neglected entity of unilateral gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 55:255–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daniels IR, Layer GT (2001) Gynaecomastia. Eur J Surg 167:885–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the research center of Damsoyu Hospital. We also thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Ryul Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board of the Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy, Seoul, South Korea, approved this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.R., Lee, S.G., Byun, G.Y. et al. Clinical Characteristics of Asymmetric Bilateral Gynecomastia: Suggestion of Desirable Surgical Method Based on a Single-Institution Experience. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 708–715 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1102-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1102-5

Keywords

Navigation