Skip to main content
Log in

Breast Durometer (Mammometer): A Novel Device for Measuring Soft-Tissue Firmness and Its Application in Cosmetic Breast Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of soft-tissue firmness has many potential applications in medical practice. This study reports a user-friendly, novel device that is capable of measuring changes in soft-tissue firmness in a reproducible manner. The study reports the development of the equipment and how it has been applied to breast implant surgery. The device was tested for both intra- and inter-observer variability on an in vitro model, using a breast implant. Once reproducibility was confirmed, breast firmness was measured on a series of patients who underwent sub-fascial breast augmentation (n = 50) to examine how it varied post-operatively. Firmness in the upper half of the breast increased to a maximum level two weeks post-surgery (0.44–0.61 Pa), reducing to pre-operative levels by 6 weeks (0.37–0.54 Pa). There was no further significant change at 12 weeks. Firmness in the nipple areolar complex (NAC) and at the lower outer quadrant (LOQ) followed a similar pattern, but remained firmer at 12 weeks. We interpret these patterns as implying that measurements taken at the upper half of the breast are indicative of post-operative oedema, whereas those at the NAC and LOQ represent changes in firmness produced by the breast implant composite. We consider the potential for this novel device in the measurement of soft-tissue firmness in aesthetic breast surgery and would encourage other researchers to explore novel applications.

Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mammometer Barker DE (1978) A new instrument for measuring “pseudocapsule firmness” after breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 2:447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhardt et al (1982) Objective clinical assessment of fibrous capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:794–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoflehner et al (1993) Mammacompliance: an objective technique for measuring capsular fibrosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:1078–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoflehner et al (1994) Subjective and objective assessment of capular contracture. Eur J Plast Surg 17:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzocchi et al (2006) Changes over time in mammary compliance values after breast augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 30:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore JR (1979) Applanation tonometry of breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:9–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alfano et al (2004) Mammary compliance: an objective measurement of capsular contracture. Aesth Plast Surg 28:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes H, McLeod P (1979) Indentation tonometry of breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown T (2012) Subfascial breast augmentation: is there any advantage over the submammary plane? Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:566–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertulat S et al (2012) Validating a dynamometer for non invasive measuring of udder firmness in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 95:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gylbert L, Berggren A (1989) Constant compression calliper for objective measurement of breast capsular contracture. Scand J Plasr Reconstr Surg 23:137–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulder JW, Nicolai JPA (1990) Breast tonometry—a practical device for accurate measurement of capsule formation. Eur J Plast Surg 13:274–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown TP, Ringrose C, Hyland RE, Cole AA, Brotherston TM (1999) A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 52:355–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown T (2016) Objective sensory changes following subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 36:784–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown T (2013) Patient expectations after breast augmentation: the imperative to audit your sizing system. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:1134–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spear SL, Baker JR (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vegas MR, Martin del Yerro JL (2013) Stiffness, compliance, resilience and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:922–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tebbetts JB (2002) A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Kayla Murphy for her technical assistance undertaking measurements on implants and Jamie Moore for statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, T., Brown, S. & Murphy, T. Breast Durometer (Mammometer): A Novel Device for Measuring Soft-Tissue Firmness and Its Application in Cosmetic Breast Surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 265–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0783-5

Keywords

Navigation