Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective and objective assessment of capsular contracture

Results obtained with textured silicone implants and histological correlation

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Contraction of the fibrous capsule around an implant after prosthetic breast surgery is a serious complication, which can adversely effect the outcome and spoil the overall result. Textured silicone implants are reported to have reduced rates of capsular contraction, but their exact mechanism, especially at the interface, remains unclear. Over a period of 21/2 years, 94 textured silicone implants were used in augmentation mammoplasty. A follow-up examination was possible in 74 cases. The clinical assessment of results was based on Baker's classification. In addition to the subjective assessment of breast firmness, objective measurements (mamma compliance) were obtained. The average follow-up period was 55.6 weeks. 79.7% of augmented breasts were classified as Baker I, 16.2% as Baker II, 4.1% as Baker III and 0% Baker IV In comparison to previous results reported in the literature, the incidence of capsular contracture obtained with textured implants was significantly lower. All Baker III cases were replacements of the original implant following advanced capsular contraction. The compliance measurements were found to correlate well with Baker's classification. Sixty-one of 72 cases of augmented breasts showed compliance values similar to normal breasts, which ranged between 0.64 and 3.7 cm at D20n. This measurement proves that 82.4% of the augmented breasts are as soft as normal breasts. A partial comparison between our clinical data and histological examination was possible. Firm adhesion of the capsule to the surface of the implant was characteristic of those breasts which showed no capsular contracture, while in breasts showing advanced capsular contraction, implant and capsule were separated by a liquid film. The use of surface textured silicone implants has led to a significantly decreased rate of capsular contraction without having to employ steroids. Close contact between implant and capsule seems to be the most important factor for reduced capsular contraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker JL (1978) Augmentation mammoplasty. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA (eds) Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. Mosby, St Louis, p 272

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs TM, Cukier J, Worthing LF (1982) Augmentation mammaplasty: a review of 18 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:445

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhardt BR, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ, Dempsey PD (1982) Objective clinical assessment of fibrous capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:794

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhardt BR et al (1986) Capsular contraction: a prospective study of the effect of local antibacterial agents. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:919

    Google Scholar 

  5. Courtiss H (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:813

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Transactions of the third international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, No. 66. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cronin TD, Persoff MM, Upton J (1978) Augmentation mammoplasty: complications and etiology. In: Owsley JQ Jr, Peterson RA (eds) Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. Mosby, St Louis, p 272

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell G (1990) Capsular contraction after breast reconstruction with silicone gel and saline filled implants: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:373

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hipps ChJ, Raju DR, Straith RE (1978) Influence of some operative and postoperative factors on capsular contracture around breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:384

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoflehner H, Pierer G, Rehak P (1993) Mamma compliance — an objective technique for measuring capsular fibrosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1078

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCurdy JA (1989) Capsular contraction following augmentation mammoplasty: etiology, management and prevention. Am J Cosm Surg 6:141

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGrath MH, Burkhardt BR (1984) The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:550

    Google Scholar 

  13. Little G, Baker JL (1980) Results of closed compression capsulotomy for treatment of contracted breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pierer G, Hoflehner H, Rehak P, Hellbom B, Scharnagl E, Deutschmann W (1991) Elektronische Kompressibilitätsmessung der Mamma — Ein neues Verfahren zur Objektivierung der Kapselfibrose. Abstraktband, 29. Jahrestagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft fur Plastische, Ästhetische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie

  15. Watson J (1976) Some observations on breast augmentation procedures over the past two decades. Aesthet Plast Surg 1:89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoflehner, H., Pierer, G., Ratschek, M. et al. Subjective and objective assessment of capsular contracture. Eur J Plast Surg 17, 69–74 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176918

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176918

key words

Navigation