Vertical Subperiosteal Mid-face-lift for Treatment of Malar Festoons
- 12k Downloads
Malar mounds may be accentuated by chronic lid edema, with the development from malar edema to malar mounds and finally to malar festoons. Because standard techniques do not seem effective and not specifically proposed for the treatment of malar festoons, subperiosteal vertical upper-midface lift associated with lower blepharoplasty overcomes these shortcomings.
Twelve patients (3 males and 9 females, age = 47 ± 6 years) underwent video-assisted endoscopic subperiosteal vertical upper-midface lift (SUM-lift) in conjunction with a lower blepharoplasty between 2006 and 2007 for treatment of malar festoons. This includes simultaneous lower blepharoplasties and video-assisted transtemporal subperiosteal and sub-SMAS tissue release.
All patients healed uneventfully without any major postoperative problems. The surgical outcome was evaluated according to the analysis of photographs obtained before and after surgery and the analysis of pre- and postoperative measurements. The technique we used (SUM-lift) achieved a significant rejuvenation of the midface and the malar festoons.
Subperiosteal vertical midface lift resuspends and redrapes the facial network that originates at the level of the orbital rim. It seems to improve the permeability characteristics of the malar septum in the treatment of malar festoons and malar mounds by freeing the cheek tissue from underlying bone and redraping the malar septum. It is a reliable technique to improve malar mounds, palpebral bags, or festoons.
KeywordsFestoons Malar membrane Vertical subperiosteal midface lift Malar mounds Blepharoplasty
Various surgical techniques have been used to treat malar bags and muscle festoons for the lower eyelid, taking into account its various etiologies. Pessa and Garza , who analyzed malar mounds and malar edema, found that the malar septum acts as a relatively impermeable barrier that allows tissue edema to accumulate above its cutaneous insertion. Following their studies, this septum defines the lower “boundary” of several clinical entities, e.g., malar mounds, malar edema, malar festoons. Therefore, malar mounds may be accentuated by chronic lid edema which may imply a time course in the progressive development from malar edema to malar mound and at least to malar festoons .
Knowing that standard lower blepharoplasties cannot correct malar loops with muscle pouches, nor the sagging of the lower orbicular muscles (ptosis), and that standard techniques do not seem effective and are not specifically proposed for the treatment of malar festoons, subperiosteal vertical upper-midface lift associated with lower blepharoplasty overcomes these shortcomings. In this article we share our experiences with our technique.
Video-assisted endoscopic subperiosteal vertical upper-midface lift (SUM-lift) in conjunction with a lower blepharoplasty and/or endoscopy-assisted forehead plasty, if needed, is indicated in patients with moderate skin elasticity and festoons which cannot be treated by high SMAS rotation advancement surgery alone and in patients who already have undergone a traditional face-lift procedure. Patients who exhibit a vertical descent of the midface (malar flatness, festoons, malar bags), including an oval configuration to the orbit, elongation of the lower eyelid skin, concomitant ptosis of the composite flap, including skin, muscle, and fat, prominent nasolabial fold, and early jowl formation, are ideal candidates for this procedure. Prior lower blepharoplasty patients who exhibit lid retraction and scleral show also may be improved by advancement of this upper-midface procedure [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14].
The procedures routinely have been performed under general anesthesia, with local anesthesia infiltration for homeostasis and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (Augmentin®, GlaxoSmithKline) for 48 h. No anticoagulation therapy was performed. Infiltration of the area was performed with a vasoconstricting solution consisting of 1 ml of 1:1000 epinephrine in 1000 ml of normal saline. Markings were performed preoperatively with the patient in a sitting position. If an upper blepharoplasty was needed, the eyebrow was held at the desired level. The redundant upper-eyelid skin was marked with the brow in an elevated position to avoid over resection. The center of the forehead at the region of the glabella was infiltrated, as were the corrugators and procerus muscles to obtain adequate vasoconstriction in the area to be dissected. The anterior temporal crest was infiltrated to produce hydrodissection and improve visualization. The infiltration continued laterally over the superior lateral orbital rim to the lateral canthus into the upper midface and the buccal sulcus.
For the forehead and upper-midface rejuvenation, six access incisions are used. The surgery is performed with a 4-mm, 30° down scope, with a protection sleeve and irrigation system to keep the field clean. The operation begins by elevating the forehead through two 2-cm sagittal incisions 1 cm behind the anterior scalp line and a standard subperiosteal forehead plasty is performed. The average lateral brow lift ranges between 4 and 6 mm as needed. For further correction of upper-eyelid pseudoptosis, loose skin of the upper lid in conjunction with a very small orbicularis oculi muscle fibers strip is resected. The protruding fat of the medial pocket is removed when needed.
The median observation time was 12 months. The procedure on average took 2 h 40 min ± 25 min. Immediate healing was achieved without major complications, adverse reactions, or side effects. Edema remained for 10–12 days.
No alopecia was observed; no swelling or seromatous fluid collection necessitated a second procedure or prolonged drainage. Three patients showed a very small intraoral wound dehiscence of 3-5 mm, two on the left side and one on the right side. Using daily local irrigation, the wound healed by secondary intention after 7 days. All patients were judged to have satisfactory cheek elevation and enhanced contour without evidence of recurrent festoons, ptosis, or loss of fixation. The patients did not complain of pain in the treated area 3 days after surgery. They did not take painkillers for more than 2 days after surgery.
Pre- and postoperative evaluation of the position of the nasojugal groove after a vertical upper-midface lift (SUM-lift) (N = 12)
5.8 ± 0.4
6.3 ± 0.3
6.0 ± 0.3
Festoons typically contain muscle and skin invaginations and must be differentiated from malar bags, which are edematous sack regions bordering on the cheek aesthetic unit that accumulate fat or fluid with age [1, 2]. Loose festoons of the orbicularis muscle are occasionally the cause of baggy eyelids, adding their bulk to that of sagging intraorbital fat [1, 2] . This is seen mostly in older patients who have lax supporting structures in the preseptal area, orbital area, and the jugal region of the lower lid . The striated muscle fibers of the orbicularis muscle are constantly active and could exacerbate the attenuation of the orbicularis muscle in the aging process . If the muscle contracts, the festoons are affected and reappear as the muscle relaxes. In rare cases a lateral-based transposition of the orbicularis muscle flap for orbicularis suspension in lower blepharoplasty is used for treating malar bags. With controlled amounts of traction to the lower lid, it is possible to correct the lowest part of the orbicularis oculi muscle due to its concentrating actions and its major vertical vector of traction. However, it is seldom effective in the treatment of festoons in the long run because it does not improve permeability characteristics of the malar septum.
The question is: Which technique is most acceptable at the time? Knowing that gravity seems to have little effect on the development of malar mounds, the progressive distribution of skin and muscle due to chronic malar edema, malar festoon may be the end stage of the process [1, 2]. This is because the facial network originates at the level of the orbital rim and the malar septum acts as an impermeable membrane from the orbital rim to the cheek skin . According to Pessa and Garza , the inferior border of the malar mound is created by dermal insertions of the inferior extent of the orbicularis muscle and that swelling in the malar mound region is primarily subdermal, forming festoons. Therefore, malar mounds tend to occur at a relatively constant location throughout life. Progressive distribution of skin results in the development of festoons because the facial fascia interdigitates with fibrous septa of the superior fascial cheek fat at the level of the orbicularis oculi as it crosses the muscles . The malar septum, as described by Pessa and Garza , divides the suborbicularis oculi fat into superior and inferior compartments. The inferior compartment is confluent with the lower cheek fat and the superior compartment contributes to the formation of malar mounds. The superior compartment contains the suborbicularis oculi fat, the orbicularis muscle, the superficial cheek fat, and the cheek skin. Thus, in some patients the malar mounds may be affected by fluctuating edema which can progress to festoons. Regarding the findings of Pessa and Garza , it seemed evident that malar mounds, edema, festoons, and periorbital ecchymosis all occur in the same anatomic area. That means that the cutaneous insertion point occurs roughly 3 cm inferior to the lateral canthus. Therefore, in agreement with Glasgold et al. , we do not believe that it is effective to use a subciliary incision alone to lift and redrape malar mounds or festoons; we believe that these are most effectively treated by direct excision of distributed skin . Concerning our findings, malar festoons seem to be correctable only if the malar septum is affected. This can be achieved by a vertical subperiosteal midface elevation, release and reset of the malar septum, and a controlled amount of traction of the orbicularis oculi muscle in conjunction with little lower-lid skin resection. By vertically elevating the soft tissue of the cheek and thus repositioning of the malar septum, tissue edema (malar festoons) above its cutaneous insertion will be resolved.
Subperiosteal vertical midface lift resuspends and redrapes the facial network that originates at the level of the orbital rim and seems to improve permeability characteristics of the malar septum, which is the membrane from the orbital rim to the cheek skin. It resolves the malar edema, the malar mounds, and the loose festoons by freeing the cheek tissue from underlying bone and repositioning the malar septum.
J. F. Hoenig, D. Knutti, and A. de la Fuente have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 10.Hamra ST (2004) The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 11:2124–2141Google Scholar
- 12.Hester TR, Gordner MA, McCord CD, Nahai F, Giannopoulos A (2000) Evolution of technique of the direct transblepharoplasty approach for the correction of lower lid and midfacial aging: maximizing results and minimizing complications in a 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:393–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Paul MP (1999) Transblepharoplasty subperiosteal forehead and midface lift. Springer, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.