Abstract
Background
Split earlobes can be classified into two groups: congenital and traumatic. The congenital group can be divided into three categories: anterior, posterior with doubled earlobe, and sagittal. The traumatic group can be divided into two categories: complete and incomplete. This report describes and compares two new techniques the authors have developed for split earlobe repair: L-specular plasty and double-curve-specular plasty. Both techniques are simple to perform and deliver a good aesthetic result.
Methods
A series of 30 patients with split earlobes underwent surgery from September 2007 to September 2009. All the patients enjoyed good health with no organic pathologies. All the patients had surgery under local anesthesia. The L-specular plasty technique was used to treat 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits). The remaining 15 patients (13 complete splits, 2 incomplete splits) were treated with the double-curve-specular plasty.
Results
Skin necrosis was not reported for any of the treated patients. Sutures are completely removed after 2 weeks. The sutures for three patients were removed after 20 days due to slow cicatrization. Repiercing of the ear may occur after 6 months. One patient (8%) experienced a wound infection, treated successfully with systemic antibiotic therapy. Two patients (16%) experienced hypertrophic scars. Only two patients (16%) had recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 13.4 months (range, 6–24 months: September 2007–2009).
Conclusion
Both double-curve-specular plasty and L-specular plasty are simple, reliable procedures. They both deliver very good aesthetic results thanks to the curve incisions that follow the natural shape of the earlobe. However, the patients treated with double-curve-specular plasty reported greater satisfaction in the outcome of their surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abenavoli FM (1996) Split earlobe: repair using a half Z-plasty technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:372–373
Apesos J, Kane M (1993) Treatment of traumatic earlobe clefts. Aesthet Plast Surg 17:253–255
Casson P (1976) How do you repair a split earlobe? J Dermatol Surg 2:21
Fayman MS (1994) Split earlobe repair. Br J Plast Surg 47:29
Gajiwala K (1998) Repair of the split earlobe using a half Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:855–856
Grenga TE (1988) Preserving the opening after repair of split earlobes. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:725–726
Hamilton R, LaRossa D (1975) Method for repair of cleft earlobes. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:99–101
Harahap M (1982) Repair of split earlobes: a review and a new technique. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 8:187–191
Maral T, Tuncali D, Ozgür F, Gürsu KG (1996) A technique for the repair of simple congenital earlobe clefts. Ann Plast Surg 37:326–331
Munro-Ashman D, MacDonald A, Feiwel M (1975) Split earlobe syndrome. Contact Dermat 1:393–394
Powell HR, Choa DI (2008) Maintaining the piercing hole in repair of the split earlobe. Clin Otolaryngol 33:74–75
Raveendran SS, Amarasinghe L (2004) The mystery of the split earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1903–1909
Scuderi N, Rubino C (2004) Chirurgia Plastica. Piccin Edizioni, Padova, Italy
Staiano JJ, Niranjan NS (2001) Split earlobe repair using a double-flap technique. Ann Plast Surg 47:89–91
Vujevich J, Goldberg LH, Obagi S (2007) Repair of partial and complete earlobe clefts: a review of 21 methods. J Drugs Dermatol 6(7):695–699
Zoltie N (1987) Split earlobes: a method of repair preserving the hole. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:619–621
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiummariello, S., Iera, M., Arleo, S. et al. L-Specular Plasty Versus Double-Round Plasty: Two New Techniques for Earlobe Split Repair. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 398–401 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9596-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9596-5